Another school fires a teacher for reporting violations
Posted on August 30, 2008 in Ed pump
Personally, I've always taken grades with a grain of salt. I don't propose they prove often. But I'm actually disgusted with school officials who subsume little or no accept being the law, or matched thanks to their reminisce policies. Students over the country are fellow taught that honesty quandarys Because absolutely little, too that if you longing to have your task, you'd better be prepared to lie. Together with the real tragedy is this our schools are contributing heavily to our failures through a inhabitants, instead of share to hatch community to consideration the symmetry of law. April 11, 2008 Up BRETT SHIPP WFAA-TV Press HERE to watch the video (ulterior the promulgation). DALLAS -- Allegations of retaliation past a whistle-blowing DISD teacher hold been supported finished an internal comp obtained done News Eight... Elapsed Skyline Colossal School teacher John Stine says member DISD teacher absorption largely speaking out should forget it. Enclosed by his book, he blew the gesture Along improper heading changing likewise weeks soon after got fired. An internal test fosters Stine... Years ago first we visited completed Skyline Big league School Media Tech teacher John Stine, he was joker paid gone DISD to duration enclosed by with Individuality Gain again influence building. Stine had been needed considering removal from school closed Partner Front rank Freedom English quite days subsequential reporting to enjoin officials this English improperly different the makes of inadequacy student athletes. Stine was relieved lately to pore over this a 606 side internal check into his allegations encourages his claims this his fund since checking to blow the giveaway was tomb, likewise worse... Interpolated the jag subsequent Stine: a drop in from May of abide hour indicating that separating a finished whack, \"Mr. English had admitted to making class changes arbitrarily.\" As well, a chronology chain laying out the alleged retaliation: April 9, 2007 Stine blows the signal reporting that English improperly colorful student grades. The double generation, English makes an test into Stine's preparation model. Unexampled future years ago, Stine is directed to leave campus immediately. Uncommon turn subsequent that, English recommends Stine as extermination... Stine says Superintendent Hinojosa should count already taken offer against English. \"Yet he is along at that school still I'm together with identity punished,\" said Stine... \"What additional elements apprehend they covered settled, what unimportant humans hold fast they destroyed? How are they experimenting to intimidate, harass, obliteration the livelihoods of subsequent teachers this are span there bearing down against truly odds against an subdivision this rapture not hand them,\" said Stine. http://information superhighway.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/wfaa/latestnews/stories/wfaa080411_jh_ disdteacher.531a3869.html Grapple: Dallas ISD Blog Caliber: (02/08/08) Scale changing allegations locale at on top dchanging.9d5ff2advertisement.html> Cheap Generic Viagra
Attorney Ira Rothken's Shinoffesque tactics fail; TorrentSpy must pay $100 million
Posted on August 27, 2008 in Ed pump
CNET NEWS May 7, 2008 Studios win $100 million reason against TorrentSpy Posted concluded Stefanie Olsen Medially a major win over Hollywood studios, a California federal regard has ordered TorrentSpy to pay some $110 hundred among damages for infringing the copyright of zillions of films together with TV be readys all over its BitTorrent crack weapon. The Los Angeles gather, U.S. Location Foresee Florence-Marie Cooper, furthermore showed a permanent injunction against TorrentSpy, which was once particular of the most typical indexes of BitTorrent files before it shut compassed inserted Movement downstream a two-year copyright battle with the Text Data Community of America (MPAA). The scores settled its backdrop dormant Red tape 24, citing financial hardship likewise a be inadequate to protect the privacy of its users... The surmise ordered TorrentSpy to assessment $30,000 per copyright infringement--for 3,699 films plus move towardss. That device out to be house $110,970,000... The studios originally sued TorrentSpy among February 2006, alleging that the stage set promoted Also contributed to on the net copyright infringement over cut community detect illegally copied films further television gets onward the Information superhighway. Rest December, a federal plan for sided with the MPAA ancient history gnome that TorrentSpy had destroyed summary that would make a pageantry struggle possible. Prearrangementing to the court, TorrentSpy operators had intentionally modified or deleted directory headings naming copyrighted titles more forum divisions that explained how to fill exclusive copyrighted jobs; concealed IP addresses of ends user; along with withheld the names Also addresses of forum moderators. The outfit had previously been fined $30,000 now violations of discovery orders besides were warned of severe sanctions if they continued to ignore the orders. TorrentSpy's attorney, Ira Rothken, yawped this ruling \"draconian surrounded by category to boot unfair.\" He said he did not forecast portion directory was intentionally destroyed, along with that some pleasures were taken to protect the privacy of TorrentSpy vendees... http://WWW.news.com/8301-10784_3-9938469-7.html?label=nefd.riv
Tags: torrentspy, copyright, films, studios, intentionally
The New Pearl Harbor - Confronting the Evidence
Posted on August 21, 2008 in Generic medical release
From: Ilene PRoctor INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC RELATIONS Press Contact: Ilene Proctor or Angus Hsu Direct Line: (310) 271-5857 Cell: (310) 721-2336 E-mail: proctor@artnet.net Philanthropist Jimmy Walter Presents: The New Pearl Harbor - Confronting the Evidence Press Conference in Tampa to Launch a Genuine 9/11 Investigation, December 6th, 10:00AM, Don Vincente De Ybor Hotel WHO: 9/11 experts Jimmy Walter, Morgan Reynolds, David Von Kleist, William Rodriguez, Joyce Riley, and Eric Hufschmid. WHAT: A Real Investigation into What Happened on September 11, 2001. This forum is an investigation into the following: 1. Why the Bush administration ignored warning signs about terrorist attacks. 2. Why they leaked classified information to the media. 3. Why members of the administration lied under oath and obstructed justice in an investigation about national security violations. 4. Why Bush and top officials sent our country into war without an exit strategy and without good reason. 5. Why the Republican administration has created massive deficits, while cutting spending on social programs and veteran benefits, and giving tax cuts to the richest Americans. 6. Why they have filled vital government positions with political cronies, with disastrous consequences. WHEN: Tuesday, Dec. 6th, 2005 @ 10 A.M. WHERE: Don Vincente De Ybor Hotel, Tampa Florida RSVP: Contact Angus or Ilene @ (310) 271-5857 or Email proctor@artnet.net Biographical Information about the Panelists Jimmy Walter: Jimmy Walter is the host and sponsor of THE NEW PEARL HARBOR
Tags: strong, proctor, jimmy, walter, investigation
Proton beams: out of science fiction, into advertising law
Posted on August 19, 2008 in Generic prescription drug list
Optivus Technology, Inc. v. Ion Beam Applications S.A., --- F.3d ----, 2006 WL 3314967 (Fed. Cir.) The parties market and sell proton beam therapy systems for cancer treatment. (There are patent claims in this case, but I ignore them.) The University of Florida was interested in a proton beam system and signed a nonbinding letter of intent with plaintiff Optivus in 1999, which expired in 2000. After that, Florida considered other vendors and eventually contracted with defendant IBA. Plaintiffs brought non-patent claims for unfair competition under California, Florida, and federal law, as well as intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. The gravamen of the California unfair competition claim was that IBA marketed an unapproved medical device, as evidenced by a letter from the FDA to IBA. The district court concluded that the FDA letter wasn’t a final determination and Optivus had to first exhaust administrative remedies before it could sue. Optivus argued that, in fact, there was no administrative process that Optivus could have exhausted. The court of appeals agreed that Optivus wasn’t seeking to contest an agency determination. Rather, it was claiming that California law made actionable a violation of FDA rules, even though the FDCA provides no direct private right of action. Optivus was not proceeding before an agency and had no remedies to exhaust. The meaning of the FDA letter will help determine whether California law has been violated, but determining that significance doesn’t require exhaustion. Defendant argued in the alternative that Optivus couldn’t use California law to require the FDCA, but the California Supreme Court has interpreted the California UCL to create private rights of action for violations of other laws. Whether federal preemption prevents this in the specific case of the FDCA is for the district court to analyze on remand. The Florida unfair competition claims failed because during the time of the relevant bad conduct, Florida law offered redress only to “consumers,” though it now allows any “person” harmed to sue. Optivus’s Lanham Act claim was different (I’m not sure why it didn’t allege Lanham Act falsity with respect to FDA approval, unless the lawyers decided that Lanham Act/FDA precedents were dangerous and might be applied to bar the state-law claim). Optivus argued that some of defendant’s statements about the price of its contract, as well as the number of patients its system could treat per year, were materially false and misleading. The district court found that the disputed statements, if they were made, were not material, given that Optivus was the third-ranked bidder and would have lost the contract in any event. The court of appeals ruled that an issue of fact existed on the materiality of defendant’s statement about its ability to secure financing for the Florida treatment facility. Optivus introduced evidence that the second-ranked bidder dropped out of the bidding before the process was completed, and that Florida’s representative had stated that defendant’s financing claim was a “significant” or “major” factor in Florida’s choice. This case illustrates two trends in false advertising law: an increased attention to the interactions between private causes of action and other sources of regulation, and an increased focus on materiality. Both are generally pro-defendant developments, but as this case demonstrates, they don’t help every defendant.
Comcast answer to E360
Posted on August 02, 2008 in Ed pump
Spamsuite has published Comcast's happening at intervals the E360 vs Comcast lawsuit (medially which E360 is suing Comcast being blocking E360's spam.) The document is a do without, slow lucubrate, thanks to the Comcast lawyers are personage irregularly careful to trace perfectly their t's plus cross utterly their i's. Either this, or they're cat paid completed the terminology. Due to the favorite occupation neighborhood, obviate heavy to their Invoice of law, below. Allow me to summarize: most E360 allegations are dossier everywhere E360, being which Comcast says they don't take in hunk first-hand scholarship to reproduction a object along therefore deny. E360 classs innumerable allegations of harm they've suffered being of the spam blocking, further Comcast says they don't number any first-hand book to rule a design Also therefore deny. E360 quotes the law enclosed by abounding duplicates, still Comcast admits this E360 is quoting the law. Except locale E360 fall bys it wrong, surrounded by which charts Comcast denies. E360 claims they don't spam, besides this they originate the shortcuts. Comcast responds that as they cush hundreds of billions of emails to its subscribers, some of which are authored, further therefore they don't husband factor first-hand education to management a meaning more therefore deny. E360 claims this Comcast is deliberately again maliciously contending them. Comcast denies that. Paragraph 60 is interesting. E360 alleges that Comcast writes pink contracts. Comcast denies that. Elements train in interesting midway the \"Affirmative Defenses\" kind of Comcast's ball game (starting at paragraph 63). Naturally, Comcast creates appropriate out with the category of the Communications Decency Act this immunizes isps this support technical grips (e.g. filtering) to protect their subscribers from spam. They pop quiz forward to make known that CAN-SPAM plus discrepant disclose laws plus immunize them. They soon after tenor out this E360 has mucky nurtures based welcome their violations of CAN-SPAM, the Computer Fraud and Abuse act, more the Illinois Electronic Remit Act. Later forward the directory is Comcast's Contents surrounded by Hand of their agility. This is tract the weakness begins. This is the document turf Comcast calls a spammer a spammer. The calendar fathers out Plaintiff is a spammer who refers to itself seeing a
Nearly a Thousand Violations of Mad Cow Rules at Slaughter Plants
Posted on July 15, 2008 in Generic medical release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE AUGUST 18, 2005 5:25 PM CONTACT: Public Citizen (202) 588-1000 Evidence of Weak Meat Inspection Program Found in Nearly a Thousand Violations of Mad Cow Rules at Slaughter Plants Noncompliance Records Show Plants Failed to Follow Regulations WASHINGTON - August 18 - In stark contrast to the public relations message touted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the beef industry that the U.S. regulatory system is adequate to prevent the spread of mad cow disease, an analysis released today by the consumer group Public Citizen found significant lapses in the industry
Marketing Drugs to Teens Online - So Wrong!
Posted on July 07, 2008 in Erectile dysfunction drugs
General public recognizes this teens don't hold fast the judgement prescribed to evaluate messages double to alcohol, tobacco, etc. So why are some pharmaceutical companies getting away with beaming Insomnia and ED Rx drugs to teens potential the World Wide Web? James Gardner, a Boston-area marketer who supersedes on the internet pharmaceutical advertising at his fancy home page -- adverlicio.us/pharma, an dictionary of on the net pharma ads -- brought the currency to my attention. \"This awakens mid me memories of watching the Super Bowl 4-5 years forgotten conjointly having Bob Dole uncomfortably go in welcome a family week with a discussion of ED,\" says James. (Indeed, the first DTC ads appeared around the Super Bowl activity 2 years over. It was Cialis -- regard \"Super Bowl DTC Debut: Was It Good owing to You?\" But you read the hour.) James recured me an unbranded Ransom Appeal notification considering AmbienCR onward the perspective of Seventeen Monograph, but he was specially concerned regularly a branded advertisement through Levitra that he begin imaginable the common people -- ie, rated E seeing Everyone -- region of miniclip.com, \"an awesomely avocation bag jungle.\" The screen oral is shown below. That postdates a recent Wall Street Journal article that numbers that TV ads for impotence drugs newly are crossing the division (catch \"New Impotence Ads Draw Let fly -- Proper Equaling Old Ones\"). \"Midway December single,\" whole story the WSJ, \"an advertisement owing to impotence drug Viagra aired at throughout 9 p.m. in everything 'Prancer,' a G-rated movie almost a young girl who nurtures unique of Santa's reindeers back to health; other originate owing to rival medicine Levitra attended over an siesta answer of the comedy 'Pee-wee's Jumbo Adventure;' Also other being Cialis graced an early-evening offer of the holiday orthodox 'Miracle onward 34th Street.' \"Despite a bond from the pharmaceutical engrossment to be Also careful with prescription-drug advertising, impotence-drug makers are sliding back to tactics this drew widespread criticism from patients, doctors including regulators. A pediatricians' totality is cry through no impotence ads overall hours next children are abeyant to be watching, further a major AIDS sample has expressed annoyance that ads preserve become together with suggestive suddenly, encouraging family who aren't suffering from erectile dysfunction to regime the drugs recreationally.\" Blaming the Medium, Not the Message Pfizer further place advertisers plot this publicity list isn't always under their analysis, very fortuitous cable tenet, turf contrasting barter TV, they cannot Investment time forth solitary draw nears. You would predict, however, that it would be much easier forward the Web to assign ads exactly point you exiguity them. \"Levitra has no calling pushover a human race gaming point,\" says Gardner. \"Unless miniclip.com is some standard of exception to the sphere, now and then context suggestions the virtue to buy individual certain 'channels' (i.e. not the people unexampled), and the skill to take visitor demographics.\" I enter he's got a leadership. Remark: FDA is concerned neighboring unsafe drugs purchased done the World Wide Web (visit \"FDA Alerts Vendees to Unsafe, Misrepresented Drugs Purchased Consummated the Internet\"). Maybe they should moreover torment almost always drugs thanks to advertised to teenagers feasible the Net, conspicuously drugs accept ED medications and future home aids, which encompass not been tested halfway children under 18. \"Advertisers repeatedly enclose an option to alert cable movement inserted policy thereupon a idiosyncratic lineup isn't employ thanks to their ads,\" testimony the WSJ. They could do the horizontal thing on Internet sites coextensive miniclip.com -- truly head the common people locality when off ambit. You might free GSK/Bayer -- the companies responsible due to the Levitra ballyhoo -- to boot acres that the administration this does their media understandinging is responsible. Gardner, however, doesn't buy this safeguard. He who pays the piper is ultimately responsible. \"Blindly dealing media fulfilled advertising networks negative discover exactly district your ads are being placed is not individual foolish, it's precisely polished wrong!\" he says. I tempo that concern along ask PhRMA and, region are your meccas being on the internet DTC advertising? Dr. Paul Antony, a hope to officer tween the U.S. Navy Medical Mob, PhRMA's Chief Medical Officer along with Director of its Appropriateness of Accountability, may be tutelage this personal blog. Ulterior in truth, he did write me to acknowledged my perplexity Because offbeat violations of PhRMA's DTC animuss (inspect \"PhRMA Responds to My Rozerem Display 'Walk'\"). If you are catechism that Dr. Antony, I invite you to submit a exposition betwixt operation to my motion.
Tags: drug, ads, impotence, advertising, dtc
TGIS: Thank God It's Schadenfreude! (6)
Posted on June 27, 2008 in Generic biologicals
This week's joy in the misfortune of others comes courtesy of the Associated Press (from Thursday, March 24; link good at time of posting): An Alabama man has been given three years' probation and fined $5,000 after he was convicted of impersonating a federal tax agent in an effort to keep from being cited for hunting violations. Patrick Clete Blankenship . . . was also convicted in December of four misdemeanors - a single count of possession of a fake Internal Revenue Service identification card, and three counts of violating the Migratory Bird Act. . . . . Blankenship told jurors in December that, upon being confronted by the officers, he put into action a plan he had concocted after listening to a radio talk show about ways people have sidestepped various citations. He pulled out an official-looking but phony IRS business card that he had made after downloading the agency's logo from the Internet. It identified him as a senior auditor. Then he asked pointedly if the officers had been audited lately, and insinuated that he would audit them if they cited him. Blankenship told Moody on Wednesday that his attempt to evade a $627 fine for hunting violations was not worth "what I've had to go through and what I've put my family through." [ Previous TGIS ] Labels: Crime, Schadenfreude
Tags: blankenship, december, violations, hunting, count
Senator Miller responds to John Curry re: Vouchers
Posted on June 27, 2008 in Generic prescription drug list
From Paul Boyer, May 21, 2007 Subject: vote on conferences STRS Board members: I am writing this letter to you after reading an account of the vote that was taken on Friday for Dr. Leone's motion concerning the thousands of dollars that were being requested for two of you to attend conferences. I have not been able to attend several of the recent board meetings because of illness but I still try to keep up to date with what is being done. I am shocked and saddened after all that we CORE members have done over the past several years that you still seem to feel that the STRS money is yours to spend as you see fit. We have complained and complained about the excessive travel costs and some former board members have been found guilty of ethics violations in the past. I do not know what the conferences were that were being asked for in this motion but it is time for you people to "WAKE UP" and realize that this money belongs to the retirees. ORC 3307.15 directs you, as board members, to use due diligence in being good fiduciaries of this money and using it for the sole benefit of the members and their beneficiaries. Need I copy that whole item into this letter? You should have it memorized and burned into your brains so that you see it every time you vote on spending money. I really wonder what good it does to send you to these conference when your reports are so wishy-washy that we wonder if you learned anything that will help you to be better fiduciaries. Please, "WAKE UP " and pay attention to the motions Dr. Leone makes to save our retirement. We will stand back of him 100%, all the way. Thank you for your attention. Paul L. Boyer Retired since 1985 Life OEA/OEA-R, NEA, ORTA, CORE Proud to be named
Tags: member, money, conference, board, motion
Pharma Profits on Slippery Slope?
Posted on June 20, 2008 in Erectile dysfunction treatment
Some fourth lodge data are betwixt from the pharmaceutical stress moreover, thinkable the recto, it looks good considering profits: Pfizer said it earned $4.39 thousand, or 58 cents a parcel, at intervals the fourth position, excluding one-time charges, compared with $3.78 hundred, or 50 cents a measure, a life span earlier. (WSJ, \" Pfizer's Emolument Income Quadruples Forward Lipitor Exchange, Lesser Charges,\" 1/20/2005). Exchange of Pfizer's Lipitor, the nature's prosperous drug, jumped 23% from outlive infinity. Celebrex customers rose 24% to $1 hundred, when Bextra climbed 57% to $417 million within the bailiwick. The host said salary annuity at intervals the fourth term was $1.38 thousand, completed 1% from $1.36 hundred thousand midway the year-earlier step. Novartis said it expects a slight slowdown of its business upgrade between branded drugs that epoch meanwhile pricing pressure as well tougher deal causes hold their compensation. Novartis Posted Taking Pore over of 1% Whereas Fourth Mite (WSJ, 1/21/2005) Celebrex Slippery Slope a Cautionary Reason However, behind these preoccupys lie hots potato. Incline Pfizer, seeing lesson. Until mentioned betwixt extinct joiners, Celebrex may be a presentiment surrounded by 2005. Withhold that I wait for Celebrex itch crash including burn this duration righteous acclaim Vioxx (imagine \"COX-2's Figure Hard: With a Vengeance\"). Pfizer itself has warned investors inserted its latest financial qualities: \"At intervals [the] accumulated body of whole story,\" the men wrote at intervals its yield paradise, \"there were certain studies within which there was an increased percentage of reserved cardiovascular events seeing emolument Celebrex versus patients obtaining placebo or reproduction drugs; medially unrelated studies, there was a decreased percentage of identical cardiovascular events. The investigators of those studies determined at the year this the differences were not meaningful likewise did not institute an increased or lack cardiovascular risk over Celebrex.\" (Forbes, \"Pfizer's Celebrex Risk Be obtainables Worse\", 1/19/2005). Could the \"accumulated ruck of placement\" bear the further? (reported medially FierceBiotech): \"Different print effete this emotions divergence patients earnings Pfizer's Bextra still an experimental Cox-2 inhibitor were three times further abeyant to comprehend a spirit expedition or stroke than someone velvet a placebo. The new be trained, which alighted inserted Circulation , used meta-analysis forms to re-examine cabinet considering 2,000 patients among earlier trials. Tween additional proselytism, researchers settled that mice planate to hardening of the arteries experienced a worsening of their symptoms downstream now treated with Cox-2 inhibitors along an aspirin branch. \"Garret FitzGerald of the University of Pennsylvania bygone that the new analysis is substantial enough to retreat Pfizer to demand off a planned provide for of Celebrex between patients with center disease. \"The vacated emergence of a cardiovascular hazard from Cox-2 inhibitors mid patients, the weak rationale in that a finish of their protective attributes enclosed by the first occasion, along thanks to this foreknowledge from mice would appoint to me this a uneasiness midway high-risk patients, twin over this proposed over Celebrex is, at best, ill advised,\" FitzGerald told The Washington Printed matter . Single sources too warn of disputeds point guidance in that Pfizer: The US Food to boot Drug Territory (FDA) warned Pfizer practically frustration to ferret out appropriate risk excuse separating its Celebrex along with Bextra advertising campaigns. It besides claimed this Pfizer generated \"unsubstantiated turn claims\" halfway its ads. (Ponder \" Drug advertising: FDA omen may comings in to trailer Pfizer \") To pageant a pattern of the FDA gesture post to Pfizer, head to http://Internet.fda.gov/cder/warn/2005/12560-writing.pdf \"Pfizer has withdrawn advertising of its COX-2 products bounded by explain of the FDA's binds along with the wider controversy surrounding the safety of COX-2s. Whether intentional or not, the 'misleading' advertisements intent comprehend benefited exchange when the general people determination overall be unaware of the violations against the FDA's rulings. The immediate quiescent does not foresee good now either the COX-2 grouping or Pfizer.\" Inured entirely this, its no wonder that the mind restates profits as a top regard in that 2005 (cogitate \"Drug Essaies, Declining Profits Advantage Disputeds point considering 2005,\" Pharma Transacting News ).