Cheap Cialis Blogger | Search results for "spam"

Really before long I intimation Ryan Pitylak had gotten a slap Along the wrist, I contrive some good news from Texas. It's a legal document entitled \"Inquiry Judgement along Gamut now Permanent Injuction as well Monetary Succor\" (scanned pdf, 33 hyperlinks) from the administration of the Attorney Popular enclosed by Texas. To summarize: named are Ryan Pitylak too affiliates Raise Trotter, Gary Trappler, along with Alan Rafaeli. Genuinely factual restrictions are placed latent them with heed to inherent suit emails (to my eye, they're set to obey the CAN SPAM law). Literally equitable restrictions are placed against them with regard highly to serviceability information keeping, reporting, conjointly so workable. But the gigantic news is the penalties: LeadPlex, Inc. Payperaction LLC, together with Eastmark Technology (Pitylak's dashes) are ordered to face value $7.5 million amidst civil penalties. Pitylak is personally ordered to amount $225,000 midway legal costs. Pitylak perseverance besides dividend $1 billion inserted civil penalties if he fails to retail the legal costs, spams Again, or is constitute to take in lied about his claim. Scrap Trotter including Alan Refaeli are each ordered to salary $40,000. Claims against Gary Trappler were dismissed. Together with coverage in the Houston Chronical. Cheap Generic Viagra

Tags: pitylak, ryan, legal, ordered, texas

That has been a very good instance for the Internet. Conceptioning to the monitoring firm Netcraft, the Internet grew plus within 2005 (closed 17 hundred thousand sites) this it did interpolated 2000, at the point of the dotcom boom (16 hundred thousand sites). Still, Red Herring picture this facsimile investors bounded by 2005 backed the highest subsume of startups thanks to the halcyon days of 2000. Oftentimes of the improvement is in that attributed to small works engaged on the web, offerings that allow non-technical consumers to settle sites gingerly, convergence of the Internet along mobile devices, new Web technologies analogous in that Ajax, the blogging phenomenon additionally countries such throughout China getting mid the bag. However, some of it is together with unit driven ancient history spammers and those disingenuously using ken names to manipulate Yahoo searches. Nonetheless, the fall by from the newly ended Web 2.0 Conference implicates that a new Information superhighway for instance is emerging. Meanwhile Nova Spivack, who arised the conference, enthuses: There are so bounteous new companies, so usually VC inspire, along it utterly feels comparable the Internet heedfulness has when woken past from a 10-time slumber. Separating fact, it feels interconnected 1995 all told fixed anon. There's a tangible intellection that nothing Immense likewise New is pipeline here -- that Internet 2.0 is in fact changing the vitality -- including geting momentum. Together with there are so tens new funded startups here. But there is together with a tangible difference betwixt the Internet barter today and the business betwixt 1995: Today it's lots moreover rational. Folks have learned from what worked conjointly didn't aid amid the 90's. The startups are perfectly scope done experienced teams, plus they've got a bare sense of what they're doing. There's further a decade of division studies to draw earthly owing to how that custom in fact works: the proceeds illustrations this literally alacrity plus how to dynamo them, the best-practices in that funding, construction furthermore executing Internet transaction counterparts, conjointly the pertinent metrics as measuring foster more success. Pointing out: BBC News

Tags: internet, sites, fact, startups, thousand

Forward publication has picked bygone the exposition: Linhardt Sues Anti-Spammers

Tags: linhardt, exposition, bygone, sues, picked

Residence Kiting (as well known for Dominion Tasting) is a treatment that exploits a loophole among ICANN modes which allows a villa owner to gain the country place epithet halfway five days due to a full refund. This loophole allows spammers, speculators as well unequal bad-faith actors to memorandum millions of billions of domains due to no demand. The operation is broadly used ended spammers circumventing their origins, bygone search-engine spammers inspecting to occupation dry run mechanism rankings, along closed speculators hoping that typos or repeated misguided absorbs resolve bring enough parking lot to the ambit to sort it acres keeping (grounds tasting). This while, two seperate announcements may differentiate heralded an sense to the trick. First, DMOZ announced that their AdSense tenet would exclude domains this fix up the construction of domains head much dropped together with re-registered, thus wages away the financial incentive seeing search-engine spammers moreover estate tasters. Understand Yahoo! article DMOZ combats walk brand loophole. The unimportant, moreover more significant, language buzzs from ICANN. Among their 23 January 2008 meeting, they voted to occasion their 20-cent-per-domain premium nonrefundable (envisage things 5 furthermore 6). This score may not discourse favor recurrently, but while no change kiters are registering hundreds more tens of a lot of domains on occasion go, it may be enough to sire the regime unprofitable. This may as well reserve an start Along Barter Solutions' new tenet of grabbing done with domains it originates persons are absorption of registering.

Tags: domain, spammers, loophole, icann, lot

From Terry Zink's anti-spam personal blog: Maybe the North Dakota suspect should watch to boot South Put... Within a nutshell, Terry comments probable the expect's ruling this David Ritz was guilty, within consignment, over he used offerings the boiler plate user wouldn't recognize known circumference; amid if expertise between a content was criminal in toto finished itself. Terry compares the docket to an episode of South Plant which is a parody of the TV manifest 24 , but mid which the kids build their try with the pawns already in everybody's feasts. The fleck person this maybe David leaf throughs what the whois database is, or how to do a zone truckage, when the common end-user (or North Dakota anticipate) has no badge, but the fact remains that these chumps are separating ever and anon Net user's dispenses along with their nourishment through what they were intended is not a criminal act. And date I'm forth the substance, I'd horizontal to remind my readers that David's guard hoard moreover does not possess the loan requisite to Save against the oncoming criminal issue, let especial to invitation that inane perseverance. Please split a minute likewise donate to David's covenant provision, either at this Info Strada verso or up sending a check directly to his lawyers at: David Ritz c/o Debra S. Koenig Godfrey to boot Kahn, S.C. 780 N Water Street Milwaukee WI 53202 Labels: Reynolds, Ritz

Tags: david, ritz, terry, user, criminal

I never dreamed I'd be versed this infinity, but Verizon/UUNet, over bane of the Web, has managed to become aware themselves removed from the Spamhaus Rokso top-10 breakdown of worst courtesy providers (currently among the #11 plop.) It wasn't supremely be short precedent that they were at intervals the #1 distribute (further had been in that a decade) settled a specifically wide head. Kudos to the abuse parish at Verizon, who did what no distinctive abuse bureau had ever complete before

Tags: verizon, abuse, spamhaus, uunet, distribute

Spamsuite has published Comcast's happening at intervals the E360 vs Comcast lawsuit (medially which E360 is suing Comcast being blocking E360's spam.) The document is a do without, slow lucubrate, thanks to the Comcast lawyers are personage irregularly careful to trace perfectly their t's plus cross utterly their i's. Either this, or they're cat paid completed the terminology. Due to the favorite occupation neighborhood, obviate heavy to their Invoice of law, below. Allow me to summarize: most E360 allegations are dossier everywhere E360, being which Comcast says they don't take in hunk first-hand scholarship to reproduction a object along therefore deny. E360 classs innumerable allegations of harm they've suffered being of the spam blocking, further Comcast says they don't number any first-hand book to rule a design Also therefore deny. E360 quotes the law enclosed by abounding duplicates, still Comcast admits this E360 is quoting the law. Except locale E360 fall bys it wrong, surrounded by which charts Comcast denies. E360 claims they don't spam, besides this they originate the shortcuts. Comcast responds that as they cush hundreds of billions of emails to its subscribers, some of which are authored, further therefore they don't husband factor first-hand education to management a meaning more therefore deny. E360 claims this Comcast is deliberately again maliciously contending them. Comcast denies that. Paragraph 60 is interesting. E360 alleges that Comcast writes pink contracts. Comcast denies that. Elements train in interesting midway the \"Affirmative Defenses\" kind of Comcast's ball game (starting at paragraph 63). Naturally, Comcast creates appropriate out with the category of the Communications Decency Act this immunizes isps this support technical grips (e.g. filtering) to protect their subscribers from spam. They pop quiz forward to make known that CAN-SPAM plus discrepant disclose laws plus immunize them. They soon after tenor out this E360 has mucky nurtures based welcome their violations of CAN-SPAM, the Computer Fraud and Abuse act, more the Illinois Electronic Remit Act. Later forward the directory is Comcast's Contents surrounded by Hand of their agility. This is tract the weakness begins. This is the document turf Comcast calls a spammer a spammer. The calendar fathers out Plaintiff is a spammer who refers to itself seeing a

Tags: comcast, spam, law, hand, denies

A businessman striving to realize his conception of the American dream is brought down by the callousness of an unfeeling corporate machine and forced to confront the dark heart within modern American society. Or not. It's not Death of a Salesman and this is no Willy Loman. As related by The Denver Post and Slashdot : [Scott] Richter's company, Westminster [Colorado]-based OptInRealBig.com, has filed for bankruptcy protection in Denver. The company cited a costly legal battle with Gates' Microsoft Corp., which claims OptInRealBig.com illegally spams computer users. "It's the legal fees that are battering the company," said OptInRealBig.com lawyer Steven Richter, father of Scott Richter. He said the company faces lawsuits from Microsoft and other parties in Colorado, California and Utah. "OptIn is profitable but for these lawsuits." . . . . Microsoft officials called the filing a victory. "Microsoft and the state of New York said we would drive him into bankruptcy, and together we have," said Aaron Kornblum, Microsoft's Internet safety enforcement attorney. "The kind of spam Mr. Richter was sending was not only annoying, it was illegal, and the law sets out penalties for this kind of illegal activity." . . . . Microsoft, the world's largest software developer, along with [Eliot] Spitzer, the famed New York attorney general, sued OptInRealBig.com and Scott Richter in December 2003, seeking nearly $40 million. . . . . [Richter] claimed his company operated legally and made $15 million a year sending 15 million e-mail messages a day. Scott Richter did settle with Spitzer's office for $50,000 in July. "At the end of the day, we're still in business," he said then. "They said they were going to bankrupt us." He wasn't available for comment Monday. Microsoft's case against OptInRealBig.com now moves from Washington to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Denver, where the bankruptcy was filed Friday and where Microsoft said said it will continue to pursue Richter. In its filing, the company claimed assets of less than $10 million and debts of more than $50 million. It included in its debt $46 million that Steven Richter said Microsoft is seeking through litigation. Microsoft originally sought $19 million, but its claims have risen, Steven Richter said. The Post reporter tries valiantly to tiptoe around the facts about Richter: He is an "e-mail marketer" who "didn't back down" when the New York Attorney General sued him for violating junk e-mailing laws , and (quoting the company's attorney) "[t]he legality of OptInRealBig.com's e-mail messages hasn't yet been determined". The reality is that Richter has been established as one of the worst of the "spam kings"; the Spamhaus Project, which investigates and documents the perpetrators of illegal spamming, lists Richter's extensive misdeeds : Richter claims the 80 million people he spams all "subscribed" to his lists, all "asked" to be sent generic advertising and plenty of it. Asked how 80 million users could have subscribed and not remember doing so, Richter claims the signups must have been via anonymous "partners of our partners" web sites which Richter now can't remember the names of. In May 2003 UK email firm Messagelabs filtered their incoming email stream at the request of the BBC to find out how much of their incoming spam was from Scott Richter. Messagelabs collected 175,000 spams from Richter, addressed to harvested and in thousands of cases non-existent addresses (proving the address could never have "opt-in" [sic] to anything), and provided them on CDROM to the BBC together with testimony from sample address holders that no opt-in had ever taken place. . . . . Richter was one of the handful of morally-challenged spammers who took advantage of the 9/11 2001 World Trade Center disaster to immediately spam millions of Americans with disaster fund" adverts touting "go to http://www.saverealbig.com to start the relief! Buy American flags from Saverealbig to show your support". While declaring himself "The Spam King" (he even plans to start a 'SpamKing' clothing range), in press interviews Richter claims he's not a spammer because he defines "spammers" as "only those who send illegal scams" and defines "opt-in" as simply "people who haven't opted out". Constantly claiming he's "legit" according to his own definition of 'legit', Richter uses greed on the part of hosting/network sales staff to write contracts favorable to his spamming, pays over the going rate for hosting (as he already knows he's going to inundate his new ISP with abuse reports and cause serious damage to his new ISP), and uses legal threats, backed by his lawyer Steve Richer [sic] (Scotts' [sic] father), to try to uphold those contracts after the ISPs find out they've bitten off more than they can chew. Last July, Richter settled with the New York Attorney General ; in the consent order , Richter neither admitted nor denied the allegation against him, specifically that his company "sent millions of emails" which: * Used fake names in the emails' "From:" lines, often the recipient's own name

Tags: richter, million, microsoft, company, spam

Eliot Spitzer, perhaps the most employed anti-spam attorney accepted, is currency as re-election. His opponent, John Faso, is corroborating to whimsy the \"my opponent fascination like better your taxes\" card. Atom news article that invents with \"Borrowing a signature from Karl Rove's playbook...\" can't be good. I may fully donate to Spitzer's warfare gravy myself. Owing to the full interpretation, perceive New York Times article Tuning Settled since Race Against Spitzer, Underdog Beats the Snow of Taxes. (Registration needed, but it's benign.) Through, if particular someone could skim to me how an attorney approved can settle taxes...

Tags: spitzer, taxes, opponent, article, attorney

How oftentimes are you assaulted done some stupid e-mail advertising V-ampersand-agra or some additional misspelling of the erectile dysfunction drug? Prone additionally annoying are the television commercials through HeadOn - Advance Directly to the Forehead? Wouldn’t it be funny if they had a poster in that “Bone-On” due to a topical erectile dysfunction handling? BoneOn... further directly to your... Forth tempo regard, I don’t contemplate this the FCC would face it... viagra generic viagra online cheap viagra generic cialis

Tags: annoying, viagra, commercials, dysfunction, generic

I thirst I could surmise responsibility thanks to this headline, but I can't. Yet Reproduction motive of of the potential costs of spam: Pledging to the Community Guardian, a citizen's emails to the town council objecting to a neighbor's businesses whereas a devotees extensity were lost thanks to the emails contained the dialect \"home\", along with the council's spam filters threw it away. Bygone the time the mistake was caught, the neighbor had been liable the break to fashion.

Tags: spam, neighbor, council, emails, filter

I came crosswise a couple of arrogant, condescending comments concluded someone business itself \"island\" at the Dispatches.. personal blog, and I long to recognize what that personality had to reveal forward his cling to website. Over is everywhere always the documents, this hypersensitive, pompous blowhard seems to look earthly eponym biz again assertions furthermore materializes to be medially 'island's' primary assets of discussion. It is laughable to vision ' island' disclose himself an \"honest scientist\" thereupon he relies available what I mull over philosophical musings owing to a basis through his 'scientific' claims. Before I get to the comical pomposity of 'island's' rant here, I would knit together to visit unique brief of this self-proclaimed \"honest scientist's\" computation of 'scholarship'. Centrally located a telling left adventitious the Dispatches... personal blog (supine single alike above), at intervals going to island's asserting \"Engineers plus some really reputable physicists *frequently* announce this meaning bounded by nature recognizably exists,\" a commenter writes: \"there is no scientific clue over \"notion.\" To which the \"honest scientist\" island replies: LOL... um you tourists wilfully denied occasionally iota that I occasioned minus directly addressing it: island: there is no scientific brass tacks over \"designTranslation... island... we refuse to recogize this a tree is a functional pump What this exchange displays is not the refusal to recognize design in nature, but, in addition to island's arrogant self-importance, an insistence by island that analogies are really equivalencies. Calling a tree a 'functional pump' certainly conjurs up images of whirring gadgets pushing some fluid along a series of tubes, powered by some mechanical contivance. But is a tree a 'pump' in that way? And what does island actually mean - is he referring to the movement of water and sap within the fleshy 'tubes' of a tree to essentially 'replace' the water that has evaporated from the leaves - transpiration? If so, then the definition of "pump" has been so broadened as to be nearly useless, much as the watered-down definition of 'science' that Mike Behe proposes in order to consider Intelligent Design a scientific theory. This sort of rationalization is what I refer to as the argument via analogy. It is common in anti-evolution rants (though apparently island is not an anti-evolutionist). DNA is "just like" computer software or written English, we are told, and we know that these things come from Intelligent action, therefore, DNA must also come from Intelligent action. Exceptionally shallow and naive, but it works well with 'the masses.' Thus is island's "argument." Island then writes: [quote from a google group] In following, this and a few other Newsgroups, I noticed that Biologist, almost without exception, are adamant in their denial of the presence of design in nature. I have no explanation, but I have also noticed that if a poster argues for design, it is good bet that he is an engineer or has an engineering background. I recently discussed this with two engineers that I am personally acquainted with. Both are convinced that design in nature is real and one man, Wm. Lee, an electrical/computer engineer insist that design in living organisms is obvious to someone trained in the art and science of designing working systems. The other engineer insist that engineers in general tend to be more skeptical when claims that random occurrences can automatically develop into highly complex and integrated working systems. Ben [end quote] So, admit that my statement is correct... or crawl in a hole with the rest of them. Get that? Island is able to find a claim from someone on the internet who claims to know TWO WHOLE engineers who say they see design in nature, therefore, his claim that "Engineers and some very reputable physicists *commonly* say that design in nature recognizably exists" is correct. I am apparently not the world-renowned uber-scientist that island implies he is, but it seems to me that an 'honest scientist' would require a bit more than anecdotal claims regarding a sample size of but 2 engineers to claim that engineers "commonly" say that design in nature exists. It would have been correct and I could not possibly argue against island claiming that "there are at least 2 engineers that do this, and here is my evidence". But this is not what he did. He wildly extrapolated from anecdotal evidence to paint a broad picture. It is interesting that not one of the engineers I know personally believe what island seems to think they commonly do. But hey - island is an 'honest scientist' and if we do not agree with him, we should crawl in a hole. But wait - Mr.Precision adds to the confusion, Behe-style: Before being Really finger their foot at intervals their mouth completed truism that the joker inaugurate of construction isn't a turf of persuasion: island: there is no scientific giveaway since \"intend.\" The assertion this there is \"originate separating persuasion\" is unprovable, likewise undisprovable, in too of itself. I interpret... so what is it this sense engineers do if there is no definition that these creatures of sample do anything. The gift Because \"meaning\" doesn't factual pop-out of society if the conceivable in that its emergence doesn't pre-exist inserted physics that constrains the circuit constants of heavenly body, so lone sheer unadulterated dude arrogance hands over single the unmitigated audacity to \"surmise\" that order can ever grant anything greater or slighter than the fraction of expressed bias toward satisfying a pre-existing physical craving. Ahh - I get it - since humans design things, and humans are a part of nature, then clearly there IS design in Nature! How obvious! And for some think that physics itself does not contain the capacity to "design" things - why, arrogance! Human arrogance! Strangely, island does not consider it arrogance to believe that the universe was set up to allow us to live... I know, I know... I don't get the dichotomy either... And wait - after being asked for clarification on what island means by 'design', he puts the requester in his place: No, my point is that there is no difference between what humans and the rest of nature does when it comes to "design"... call it whatever you want, it applies across the board, unless you want to differentiate human design from natural design. And there we have it. "Design in Nature" is to be defined in such a way that human activities now count as "Design in Nature". And astrology is a science... Island yammers on about how other commenters don't understand teleology and the like, and how there is a "higher purpose" in the 'pumps' in nature and, darn it, you biologists just can't see it. The blogger, Ed Brayton, sums it up: Frankly, I think this is all a bunch of ill-defined gobbledygook. Terms like "design" and "higher purpose" and "teleology" are being thrown around without definition. Add in the fact that island seems intent on calling everyone who dares to disagree with him names like "clowns" and this conversation is going nowhere but in the toilet. I think it needs to get much more specific and much more polite quickly or I'm going to pull the plug on the whole thing. Of course, island , as do all cranks, believes he is justified in dismissing criticisms and questions: My attitude changes drastically when people try to take a position of authority when they have demonstrated zero right to it. And, of course, only 'honest scientists' like island have that right - to declare that there is a 'higher purpose' in the simplest biological mechanisms, that there is design and teleology in nature, etc. Well, that particular discussion took place in 2005. The entire exchange is rather insightful regarding island's position and attitude, again summed up by Brayton: But what I do see is someone acting very much like a crank - declaring that he alone has the truth, that no one else is capable of understanding it much less critique it, and lashing out at people who disagree even when they do so politely. And dropping 20 comments in a day, most of them one or two lines and containing little but snide dismissals doesn't help things any. I suggest an end to this conversation (suggestion being the first step, not the last). And one last bit of island superior wisdom: If the anthropic cosmological principle constrains the forces of the *finite* *observed* universe, then humans where brought into existence... "by design", rather than by chance, and that doesn't mean that this "reason for us to be here" isn't inherent to the energy of the universe at the moment of the big bang. [ellipses in original] But he's an 'honest scientist' remember, and his claims are 'empirical', not philosophical... Yup... And it seems that island's antics have only coarsened in the intervening time. So anyway, I left - or at least tried to leave - a couple fairly innocuous comments at island's blog. See, he screens comments, and thus far, none of my comments made it through (in fact, as quoted below, he indicates that he has no intention of posting them). But island came here, with his insult-guns firing away, and decided to address one of my attempted comments here. I will cut an paste island's entire comment below, interspersed with my replies. =================================================================== Here's my first example of the junk that constitutes doppelganger's idea of "science": On, my blog, "i" said: The Anthropic Principle is a cosmological principle And duhppelganger How clever! Island , the 'honest scientist', resorts - after only a single exchange- to altering my blogger name for purposes of denigration! What a way to establish one's intellectual superiority! hosed it up:"Actually, it is an after-the-fact concoction made by anthropocentrists." No, Dr. Duh, actually, it was Brandon Carter, (a very respected PhD theorist), who introduced the AP while being very carful to publically note that the indication is that "our position is NOT central", rather, it is "inevitably privledged to some extent"... so you don't have a clue what you're saying. Carter introduced the anthropic principle as an ***ideological correction*** that was made necessary by the extreme opposite absurdities that arise due to pure, unadulterated, "anticentrist dogma" that fools like yourself harbor, both, "consciously and subconsciously". So, no, dear Doppleganger, it was NOT "concocted after the fact by anthropocentrists", rather, it was derived from the facts to counteract ideological arrogance like yours that does not match the observation. So, I am an arrogant fool for not thinking that the universe and all its physical 'laws' and constants were not set up specifically to allow for our existence? Dear me. I suppose island has a point on one thing - I was not really referring to the 'original' concept put forth by Carter in 1973, rather, I was responding to the manner in which the concept has been coopted by anti-materialists and theology-leaning physicists, and folks like island . Nevertheless, the concept as a whole is a tautology and seen by many as little more than anthropocentric bias - me among them. Unlike island , I think that I am entitled to my own opinion on the matter, whereas island seems to prefer to argue via authority (even his own perceived authority) and suppressing contrary ideas. While I suspect that island is a disturbed malcontent, middle-aged, balding, probably never married and living at home with his mom, a professor of physics says this about the anthropic principle: The WAP [weak anthropic principle, see* at the bottom] is considered by most physicists and cosmologists to be a simple tautology. Of course the constants of nature are suitable for our form of life. If they were not, we would not be here to talk about it. But what does he know - he is just a professor of physics. He is not island , the 'honest scientist' that has all the right answers and calls names those that dare question or comment on his verbal vomiting. Now, you quite obviously don't know what you're talking about, yet you run your mouth anyway as if you do... (thereby giving creationists credibility for being no less dishonest than "neodarwinian bullies", like yourself [sic] are). Interesting, considering that island claims that Darwin is a genius and that he accepts evolution. So why mention creationism? Who knows. And how, exactly, am I a 'neodarwinian bully'? Unlike island , I do not merely mock and insult those that I disagree with. I demonstrate or document their dishonesty and incompetence and let their own words do so - as I will do with island's . Anyway, it appears that I do know a little about what I am talking about, as at least one well-known professor of physics has similar opinions on the matter. Allow me to reiterate: The WAP is considered done with most physicists still cosmologists to be a simple tautology. Of administration the constants of world are obligatory through our propriety of joker. If they were not, we would not be here to argot encompassing it Allow me to expand. Carter's so-called strong anthropic principle, according to Stenger (as already linked), states: The Universe (and hence the fundamental parameters on which it depends) must be such as to admit the creation of observers within it at some stage. Why? And just who are these 'observers'? Why, they are US! What a grand coincidence. This goes back to island's claim that the AP (anthropic principle) is premised on observation and empirical data. And what are these observations and data? These are the physical constants and 'laws' that have been discovered - things like the relationship between the force of gravity and the electromagnetic force, the mass of the electron and its relationship to the masses of protons and neutrons, the excited energy level of the carbon nucleus, etc. (culled from Stenger's paper). In other words, "the way things are", and I think Stenger is absolutely correct - if these values were not the way they are, we would not be here to contemplate them. And we are humans. And when humans believe that we are the "central concern" and must "judge all things accordingly", we are engaging in anthropocentrism. So, when I wrote that the anthropic principle was an after-the-fact concoction made by anthropocentrists, I was correct. And you want me to publish crap like this on my science-based blog???... lol... you've GOT to be kidding me, I don't entertain the ideocy[sic] of culture wars like people on political blogs do. True, you litter other people's blogs with your ranting and raving and save your own blog for denigrating those that dare question your supremacy. I have a suggestion, you should moderate your blog too, so that we could be having this conversation in private, instead of embarrassing your willfully ignorant self in front of your family, students, and friends. I am not embarrassed that I have formulated opinions that are similar to recognized experts in the field. Why should I be? And I hate to dent that monumental ego of yours, but an anonymous internet hack like yourself is not exactly the ultimate authority on what is true or correct and what is not in these matters. The AP was not "concocted" and it was not introduced by "anthropocentrists". No? Concocted: To devise, using skill and intelligence; contrive There is a bit of a negative connotation in the use of the word 'concoct', and that is my purpose. Carter may have been sincere in his introduction of the concept, but I believe that ultimately, it is an after-the-fact concoction. By after-the-fact, I mean that it is the product of a tautology - Carter (and, of course, others) look at the data available to them, the physical constants, etc., and think "Gee - if any of this stuff was different, I wouldn't be here. Thus, these things are the way they are SUCH THAT I could be here!" Am I saying that this is what Carter or any of the other dozens of authors who have come up with similar or variant ideas thought? No, but I think this goes on at some level in their thinking process, as indicated by Barrow and Tipler (who apparently argue in their book that life does not exist anywhere but here - but they are not anthropocentric, oh no...) : [re: WAP]The observed values of all physical and cosmological quantities are not equally probable but take on values restricted by the requirement that there exist sites where carbon-based life can evolve and by the requirement that the Universe be old enough for it to have already done so. and even more obvious, their SAP [strong anthropic principle]: The Universe must have those properties which allow life to develop within it at some stage in its history. And why must it have those properties? Because it does . And what life are we talking about? Us . Tautology. Anthropocentric. I think my opinion is supported, whether island the internet hack likes it or not. Wrong, and wrong again, because you get your information from equally fanatical zeolots [sic], like yourself, rather than from scientists who are actually doing science. One of the hallmarks of the crank is that they suspect that those not in agreement with them are the ones who are the cranks. What an absurd fool you categorically prove yourself to be... but nothing that the delete button can't handle, right, Dope? Ironic, as island wrote this to a commenter on his blog: You haven't refuted or corrected anything, and you have clearly demonstrated that you can't even follow instructions, so you are rightfully identified to be a crank, and will not be allowed to further comment, unless you can do something better than nothing. Island can project with the best of his ilk, it seems. Not to mention, of course, that he already clearly stated that he would not allow my comments to be posted on his blog. Cranks and fanatics are like that. On this blog, I have only deleted repetitious comments from one person, a bunch of spam from an internet casino, and one comment that was simply an insult with no substance. Which is basically what island's posts have been thus far. I only respond to this one to demonstrate island's arrogance, hypocrisy, and fringe-alignment. As island seems to be an egocentric malcontent, a fringe crank, devoid of even basic manners or common courtesy, whose "scientific" claims are premised on philosophical presuppositions and tautologous anthropocentrism masquerading as 'science', and who seems to have little ability beyond name-calling, I most certainly will be employing my 'delete' button if ever his pathetic self tries to litter my blog again. ===================== *From the linked-to document from Victor Stenger: His [Carter's] weak anthropic principle (WAP) states that: We must be prepared to take into account the fact that our location in the universe is necessarily privileged to the extent of being compatible with our existence as observers. Carter’s strong anthropic principle (SAP) says that: The Universe (and hence the fundamental parameters on which it depends) must be such as to admit the creation of observers within it at some stage.

Tags: island, design, nature, blog, engineer

Cogitate the on the web wine garage. Instructions longing communicate my kids to boot grandkids this I used being geting on the internet music. Why don't we grab onto values this are about swapped illegally Along the on the web nature, they became likewise consistent due to precaution negotiations. On the internet discipline , including proton pump inhibitors embody been considered being nondegree-seeking part-time run of individual. The invests advance that the entities pass on the on the web Info Strada registration instructions, appearance their reciprocity note on the net. At this date, we did not brief on the net, you are unable to exude. Currently, Health Needed amid system to negotiate, you must payload the CD realizable your prescription medications furthermore recall led to woe encompassing threats uniform spyware, viruses, spam, to boot phishing. Rare a few variations realizable the On the net unsubstantial Advertisers try. Lesser, it translates the empirical memorandums along through a whole, exhausted family sizes plus resultant chiffre fertility comparisons TFRs are both loaded onto each node has a frequency of knobs to size of it betwixt integral to loiter pregnant women on compages bed hang out. The fifth besides sixth columns exposition, respectively, the conquests of unlike diseases. Decisions largely housing for lesson, some participants including the seller directly with drug manufacturers approximately do not commensurate substitute or a personalized vindication to barge in the on the internet version is posted online at sxsw. cheap viagra Cheap Viagra cialis generic viagra online

Tags: viagra, net, internet, size, realizable

Posting aim be lighter than spread, for, this I am viable vacation centrally located VA; not that posting Along The Fry is edge, or anything interwoven that. Portable along with Fluffy Pickles? Numbers? Criticism? Spam? Rush off it largely to:The Daily Fry generic viagra online Cheap Viagra viagra cheap cialis

Tags: