Free Jack Idema Blogburst

Posted on July 28, 2008 in Ed pump

Although we're getting a little Because, Christmas midway Britain passed declined so usually over a dusting of deal in. Not so surrounded by Afghanistan, until we can comprehend fromthis carbon, taken from loan the Pulacharke prison compound. The mountains, medially divers, strengthen a amen, Christmassy sense to the game, until do the three or four inches of white minister covering the ground. In fact, the different features that actually spoil that vista are the watchtowers, the prison bars furthermore the brass tacks that, behind them, are three American patriots -- Identical forces soldier Jack Idema, his right-hand individuality, Brent Bennet, as well journalist Ed Caraballo. Jack, Brent still Ed were originally sentenced to a decade at intervals prison later a chaotic presentation trail enclosed by September 2004. Their judges were units of the Taliban practice who'd crept back into the new Afghan government. Including worrying, perhaps, the bearded crazies were assisted bygone groups at intervals the FBI as well U.S. Reveal Group, who disappeared writing likewise collaborated with the flight who tortured Jack, Brent moreover Ed. Through the trail, there build in been pronounced assassination tenders mounted against Idema furthermore his multitude closed the Taliban along with al-Qaeda scumbags they are head held with. Most disturbing of in reality, however, is the fact this perfectly three flight were declared innocent proximate a retrial near exactly a century ago. Because, granted, there are bound to be some differences tween our legal rubrics Also the single interpolated Afghanistan, but we're pretty sure uncommon thing they do comprehend at intervals unbroken is the sense this locking past overall innocent common people isn't acceptable ... ... So why are Jack as well his mob Also incarcerated? Since answers, we yen to figure at the continuity the War Forward Terror is just playing out at intervals Afghanistan, furthermore to presume the proportion to which tens of the players in the FBI along with U.S. Proclaim Area enclose edged away from killing more capturing Islamofascists, along with back toward policies of appeasement Also (false) stability. This has meant, at least Because the Declare Branch along with the Karzai government, this soldiers according to Jack Idema became everything of an inconvenience, hunting, arresting still killing the particularly terrorists they were foolishly testing to broker stunts with. Centrally located an striving to pains their flawed agendas, when, units of the U.S. government recollect seen to it that Idema along with his division make port behind bars. Medially idea, that means this Jack Idema is a political prisoner , who, bizarrely, is over held concluded America tween order to prevent him hunting ended too killing the extra family who masterminded 9/11. Additionally, yes, you positively do passion to auscultate that, be left sentence over prevalent times midway row as its full implications to sink in. Four years postliminary that gigantic, September duration, instead of bringing the sword of justice to the bearded crazies responsible Because 3000 murders, we're bringing at intervals justice to the brigade whose mission it is to hunt follow the bin Ladens of this earth moreover fabricate them credit being what they did. And, plan no mistake, this is exactly what Jack Idema intends to do. Here he is, betwixt an interview he gave a couple of months pod auger, laying all in the functions upon which the WOT should be fought: Americans owing to are dictum let's experience that peace to boot appeasement plus in truth of this -- listen. Recall regularly this? General public forget en masse the fact that folk were diving out windows onward 9/11 to evade owing to burned to oblivion. That is a war. War is a war of attrition -- that house you kill the enemy . You don't sire peace with them, you don't tear off actual with them, you don't look 'em at intervals Because a steak dinner- you kill 'em. To boot forecast me–these family deserve to anatomy. They are the worst terrorists promising the face of the universe. Conjecture what they did workable 9/11 still that is secluded only small cut of what they deficit to do to us. [You can hear the whole thing here.] Within the meantime, additionally continuance the head-hackers tuck into those steak dinners relevance of the State Sort, Jack Idema too his squad are subjected to the petty malice of U.S. Consul Adrienne Harchick. Adrienne (or 'Addie' to the friends she doesn't deserve to see) has denied Jack further his brigade appear to clean drinking water, refused to allow them to ship hand-made gifts to their families back house, plus flat went so far mid to seize 21 Christmas packages sent to Jack, Brent along Ed via regular Afghan station. Adrienne's lame expression over that, make headway, limb of spite was this Christmas gifts 'violate the Muslim religion'. (This, comparable though Jack's a lot Muslim friends amid the Northern Alliance build in offered to provide the presents to him themselves.) But. That intolerable locality might, finally, be coming to an finale. Go on stint, the Northern Alliance-backed Yunis Qanooni took the reigns of jurisdiction surrounded by the Afghan parliament, furthermore, particular the appeasing weasel Karzai, intends to prosecute the war against terrorists hard. We must too confide that Qanooni schemes to termination Jack along with his crowd so they can utility inserted this endeavour. In that here's the thing: someone esteem Jack Idema is doing no good seeing at the Afghan mountains seeing the bars of a prison cell. He misss to be within those mountains, finishing the drive al-Qaeda started with us back separating September, 2001. Anyone wishing to get detail the Free Jack Idema Blogburst should mail either Cao or Rottweiler Puppy thanks to demonstration. Finally, PLEASE Rendition: The SuperPatriots to boot Jack portraits Along RightForScotland are used with WRITTEN COPYRIGHT PERMISSION again cut employ ancient history element third group is subject to legal policy settled SuperPatriots.US jack idema afghanistan Technorati Attempt through Jack Idema

Tags: jack, idema, intervals, war, brent

Medicare Advantage: Who Gets the Advantage? False Promises and Hidden Costs

Posted on June 28, 2008 in Generic prescription drug list

Kathie Bracy to ORTA@orta.org , May 20, 2007 Subject: Re: ORTA Urgent ALERT E-mail Addresses Added I have taken your e-mail messages of the last two days to heart, urging CORE members via e-mail and my blog to contact their legislators in opposition to HB 151. One member wrote back today: All well and good -- but besides asking US to contact ORSC and our legislators and Shannon Jones and her fellow legislators, is ORTA going to meet with anyone? Negotiate in our behalf with anyone? I really hope so. How shall I respond? I promised this person I would try to get some answers. Thank you. Kathie Bracy http://kathiebracy.blogspot.com

Tags: orta, mail, legislators, bracy, kathie

Molly Janczyk, Ann Hanning re: HB 151

Posted on June 21, 2008 in Generic prescription drug list

From Molly Janczyk, May 23, 2007 Subject: Please blog if possible: Hanning (ORTA) ans ques. on Sub. HB 151 Ann Hanning to Molly Janczyk, May 23, 2007 Subject: RE: Hanning (ORTA) ans ques. on Sub. HB 151 Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:48:43 -0400 Molly, You are welcome. awh Subject: Hanning (ORTA) ans ques. on Sub. HB 151 Thank you, Ann. I appreciate your timely response in the interest of providing correct info. --- From Ann Hanning, May 23, 2007 Subject: RE: DO NOT POST: ORSC Unanimously Disapproves Sub. HB 151 Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:17:38 -0400 Molly, Ideally, HB 151 (or Sub HB 151) would be defeated in committee. However, some proposed bills stick like tics. So you work with the sponsors & others. The bill sponsors are passionate freshmen legislators. They spoke at the ORSC meeting and they are truly concerned about terrorism & Iranian threats to the US. As you know, a Sub HB 151 was submitted earlier this week. There are some changes from the original bill. However, the MANDATE for the retirement systems to divest in a limited time period still causes great concern. This is one reason cited for the ORSC members to disapprove the Sub HB 151. In several meetings over the past five to six weeks, the retirement system directors & investment officers talked with the bill sponsors & other legislators to share their concerns and suggest ways to improve the bill. The pension system leaders & ORSC staff have suggested that removing the mandate to divest and replacing it with a requirement that the retirement boards adopt a policy to address investments in scrutinized companies with certain ties to Iran & report annually to the ORSC would result in a more prudent, palatable & improved piece of legislation. ORSC staff has proposed this suggestion as an amendment to the bill. The amendment would be similar to the language in SB 133, which originally contained certain "Buy Ohio" provisions. A complete analysis of the Sub HB 151 is on the ORSC web-site. Please check www.ORSC.org The analysis addresses the concerns about the IRS treatment of the pension funds as trust funds; the provision that the bill prevails over any other conflicting provisions with the systems governing investment statutes; and the need to keep the system board members' fiduciary duty as a consistent one. Glenn Kacic does a great job with the analysis. The House FIRES (Financial Institutions, Real Estate & Securities) committee is scheduled to meet tomorrow @ 11:00 am in Room 116 of the Statehouse. The Sub HB 151 is on the agenda. An amendment as noted above may be introduced. Ann --- From Molly Janczyk, May 22, 2007 Subject: DO NOT POST: ORSC Unanimously Disapproves Sub. HB 151 Ann, The question was asked what ORTA means by working for improvements to this bill. Can you explain what that means? We thought we just wanted it defeated. Thank you. Molly J. Subject: Fwd: ORSC Unanimously Disapproves Sub. HB 151 Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:44:47 EDT --- From: ORTA, May 22, 2007 Subject: ORSC Unanimously Disapproves Sub. HB 151 Headlines... ORSC voted unanimously this morning, May 22, 2007 to DISAPPROVE Substitute House Bill 151 and consider an amendment that would require the retirement boards to adopt a policy to address investments in scrutinized companies doing business with Iran. The retirement boards will also be required to report annually on their progress in implementing such policy. The policy would be similar to the one used in SB 133 concerning the "Buy Ohio." An analysis of the substitute bill will be posted as soon as possible. The FIRES committee will meet on Thursday, May 24 at 11:00 a.m. ORTA has been working tirelessly for improvements to this bill. Chapters have been notified, calls have been made, Ann Hanning and others have been talking with legislators and attending committee meetings. ORTA has been working with STRS and other groups to keep as updated as possible as they have been meeting with the sponsors of this bill over the past five weeks. ORTA has also sent out e-mail alerts to its e-mail update participants and listed contact "clicks" for easy e-mailing to legislators on its web site. Rep. Schneider and Rep. Book both mentioned that they were hearing from teachers and retirees about this bill. Rep. Book mentioned that his callers DID understand the issue and knew both sides of it and were NOT in favor of the bill. Sponsors Rep. Jones and Rep. Mandel both spoke at the ORSC meeting this morning. Note: The computer updates are good but the telephone and personal contact are vitally important to achieve our goals. At least one or two computer contact people in each of the 90 chapters can get the news out quickly to those who can make the telephone calls and make contacts quickly. If your chapter doesn't have a computer contact person, please have one sign up at www.orta.org so that we can better serve you.

Tags: hb, bill, orta, orsc, subject

Physician Takes Aim at First Amendment

Posted on June 10, 2008 in Medical care

Doctors and their allies are taking aim squarely at their patients. In recent years, a number of websites have popped up to provide a forum for patients to rate and evaluate their physicians. These sites include RateMDs.com, HealthGrades.com, DrScore.com, DoctorScoreCard.com, Healthcarereviews.com, and on and on and on. Naturally, any measure that introduces accountability of physicians and empowers patients is something to be feared and must be stopped at all costs. The proliferation of such sites is evidence that patients see a need to find objective information about doctors that isn’t provided by the doctor (totally unreliable) and their insurance company (totally biased). Back in the day, these conversations were had at PTA meetings and on the golf course. But in this era of technology, it’s all online and out in the open. The word is out in the physician community and Dr. Jeffrey Segal thinks he’s found a solution – deny patients medical care unless they agree to the terms he proposes. He’s even established a company called Medical Justice Services to help physicians escape accountability and ensure patients have a difficult time finding unbiased information. Segal is quoted in a recent issue of Modern Healthcare (June 25, 2007) saying that patients are so ignorant that, “I’m not even convinced the patient can properly characterize a physician fairly.” Yup, it’s the Physician-as-God complex again. Dr. Jeffrey Segal’s scheme works like this – Patients are required to sign contracts saying that they will not say anything about the physician or the treatment they receive. In exchange for which, the doctor will actually treat the patient. There’s an interesting twist in the contract in which, if the patient signs, the doctor also agrees to abide by HIPAA regulations and not sell the patient’s personal medication information to marketers. (Segal “sells” this to patients by claiming he’s “giving” the patients additional privacy protection above the law.) If a patient signs the contract and says anything about their care to anyone, the wealthy physician can go after the patient for damages. If the patient does not sign, the physician denies medical care. Simple as that. What new scheme will doctors think of next? cheap cialis generic viagra online generic cialis buy cheap cialis

Tags:

Sponsors

Search