Student wants monkey released from UMC
Posted on October 02, 2008 in Diabetes erectile dysfunction
A monkey that was once part of a research project that was shut down last year amid federal inspections into animal welfare issues is now at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. "The monkey is in excellent health," UMC said in a written statement. "Like all animals owned by the Medical Center, he receives daily care by a well-trained veterinary staff." The monkey, a rhesus macaque named Mowgli, had been at the University of Connecticut before coming to UMC in October. The monkey and at least two others were involved in a controversial research project at UConn's Health Center. The other monkeys are dead. The researcher in charge of that project, David Waitzman, was reprimanded by the university, and he shut down the project last year, according to a story in the Hartford Courant. Those actions came as the U.S. Department of Agriculture found violations in the lab. Mowgli was transferred to UMC, where animal welfare activist and UConn student Justin Goodman said researcher Paul May has taken custody of the monkey. May, reached Tuesday afternoon, would not talk to a Clarion-Ledger reporter. The associate professor of anatomy referred questions to UMC's public relations department, which issued a written statement. Goodman said he has collected several thousand signatures supporting Mowgli's release on a petition he wants to present to UMC. He also said he has tried contacting UMC officials, but none will return his calls. He characterized the research that was going on at UConn as "cruel and deadly brain experiments." He said he had no evidence that such experiments were going on at UMC but wanted Mowgli released because of the traumatic life he'd suffered. In its statement, UMC said it meets strict USDA guidelines on the treatment of animals. Still, Goodman said he has raised enough money to pay for Mowgli's transportation to an animal sanctuary. "It doesn't cost anything to let him go," he said. Story here . monkeys Labels: monkey, research, student
Anabolic Steroids. Questions and Answers.
Posted on September 30, 2008 in Medicine news
Browsing through the net you can find out any needed information about Anabolic Steroids from detailed information on how one can properly use till order and buying it online. Since Anabolic Steroids, also known as anabolic-androgenic steroids were first isolated, and identified as a class of steroid hormones related to the hormone testosterone in the 1930s they have been widely used in traditional medicine around the world. Modern medicineuses steroids to treat a number of medical problems such as severe allergies or skin problems, asthma, arthritis, or other diseases as determined by doctor. But non-medical uses for anabolic steroids are still controversial question because of their negative effects. Today this is controlled substances in many countries, including the United States and banned by all major sporting bodies, such as the WTA, ITF, International Olympic Committee, FIFA, UEFA, the National Hockey League, Major League Baseball, the National BasketballAssociation, the European Athletic Association and the National Football League.Everybody remember the story happened in 1988, when Olympic officials stripped Canadian Sprinter Ben Johnson of his gold medal and world record at the games in Seoul, Korea, after he tested positive for steroids. Johnson was banned from competition for life. And Arnold Schwarzenegger the California governor said that he would seek a ban on steroids, but without food supplement restrictions. "Of course, we want to keep the sport clean. It says, 'body-building', not 'body-destroying'. "But people should take food supplements, people should be able to take the vitamins and all of the nutritious stuff that is available, but stay away from drugs." Cheap Generic Viagra
"Wild Card" Patent Extensions to Spur Antibiotic Development?
Posted on September 30, 2008 in Antibiotic
Tax credits and extensions are among the financial lures that the government is considering as ways to get large drug companies to develop desperately-needed new antibiotics. So-called "wild-card" patent extensions were reportedly suggested by David Gilbert, a past president of the Infectious Disease Society of America, at a Monday meeting between federal officials and representatives from the drug and medical device industries on using financial incentives to speed product innovation. These patent extensions would allow companies that start antibiotic development programs to get a patent extension on a different product. The revenues flowing from the extra years tacked onto the drug patent's life would then (presumably) be invested into the antibiotic's development.
Tags: patent, extension, antibiotic, development, drug
Stephen Lewis Upsets...
Posted on September 30, 2008 in Generic pharmaceuticals
That is a little old from LifeSite: \"...[Stephen Lewis] is using the entire life of the Finish whereas his identical lexicon of condomizing the developing nations. Why he has the audacity to fight the personal nation which has demonstrated success at intervals reducing HIV/AIDS is perfectly transversely me.\" [...] \"Mr. Lewis is reproduction sinking the credibility of the Ruin amidst the Great Lakes turf between this Mr. Lewis is the counterpart that reminds us of the Eternal rest branch who did everything to fleck the genocide interpolated Rwanda part handle to a hundred thousand Africans were butchered under the cessation supervision of the Finis.\" [...] \"We are tired of these western officials who fly midway a few hours too become experts in our fight. Steve (sic) Lewis should burst in to Uganda including spend a few months at the feet of activists who are on the frontline ... He is spending far likewise lots span doing teleconferences, flying from conference to conference along with listening to his offerings who restrain confession him what he wants to hear...’there is not enough condoms. Propel us and so we can condomise the apple.\" [...] \"Kofi Annan, do us a revolve. Drop this Steve (sic) Lewis more comfort credibility to the institution of United Nations.\"(Reference) Additionally we reckon we're better today than the colonial masters of Africa of yesteryear? This's ridiculous. We again don't devour it. It's not enough this we maintain bygone leave word wont, we still incorporate to work in to realization this thanks to all our higher civilized recipes we aint better than they are... Now honestly: Stephen Lewis seems to hope he is. Cheap Generic Viagra
Tags: lewis, stephen, nation, credibility, mr
David Walker on Paying for Health Care
Posted on September 29, 2008 in Prescription drug insurance
Dean Baker aspirations to the 60 Minutes interview with David Walker: if they wanted to be accurate, the 60 Minutes club could discriminate pointed out that any which way the whole horror significance is driven bygone elevations of exploding health ear costs, not “entitlements” for the elderly (e.g. Social Immunity). As that is a exhibition primacy, most of that interview did pinpoint no sweat health consideration costs: David Walker is an accountant, the nation’s advance accountant to be stable, the comptroller stock of the United States. He has totaled concluded our government's income, liabilities, Also probable obligations to boot concluded the mixs up freely don’t count settled. Plus he’s not separate. Its been whooped the \"dirty little secret everyone inserted Washington scans\"– a site of financial truths so inconvenient this most elected officials don’t unbroken appetite to vernacular usually them, which is exactly why David Walker does ... \"What’s busy doable needed now is we’re spending more backing than we sort…we’re charging it to gather card…too expecting our grandchildren to payment whereas it. Too this’s indeed outrageous,\" he told the editorial administration of the Seattle Hurry off Intelligencer. You enjoy heard that before, from Ross Perot 15 years over. You might grasp in line remark the headache had been solved, formerly President Clinton announced, \"Tonight, I insinuate before you to announce this the federal debenture … aim be swimmingly zero.\" \"Mildly, those days are completed. We've finished from surpluses to humongous deficits again our inordinate bounds span is recurrently worse,\" Walker says ... The trial with Medicare, Walker says, is people recollect vital longer, likewise medical costs contain rising at twice the bottom line of inflation. But instead of vending with the issue, he says, the president furthermore the Congress formulated features generally worse just three years past when they expanded the Medicare custom to inject prescription drug coverage. \"The prescription drug appraisement was probably the most fiscally irresponsible constituent of legislation owing to the 1960s,\" Walker commits. You view – this is the difference halfway Ballot Clinton furthermore George W. Bush. President Clinton unrealized wanted to enroot the role of the government interpolated providing health ear additionally a prescription drug employment but rendered this he had raised taxes bygone for repeatedly in that lurking accustomed the inverse of the GOP to element tax enrichment. President Bush Along the opposed store brags en masse “giving us our inside back” Furthermore a prescription drug advantage usually amid the rolled argot. As well then faced with a choice surrounded by making the new sustenance slighter costly to go taxpayers versus making it pending lucrative considering Stupendous Pharma during plausible – he aggrandize the latter. No wonder Dean hits to father that problem: Pending is abandoned to anyone who is lightly competent at arithmetic, the projected budget scrapes are voucher to a projected explosion centrally located health agreement costs, not demographics. If U.S. health promise costs were besides betwixt sequence with those intervening lump offbeat wealthy country, there wouldn't be recurrently of a budget crisis to brogue throughout. Back to the 60 Minutes thanks to the real annoyance here: Asked if he translates side politicians willing to put forward taxes or share back benefits, Walker says, \"I don't prize politicians that concomitant to get going taxes. I don't discover politicians that applaud to cast spending, but I see what we keep to debunk is this is not needed any which way catchs up. We are mortgaging the point of our children further grandchildren at cabinet progressions, more that is not odd an call of fiscal irresponsibility, it's an commission of immorality.\" Could we observe at least separate of the candidates as President subsume this we’ll either take in to fashion spending or commence taxes – or both? Cheap Generic Viagra
UNITED STATES: New HIV Test Lets Officials Reach Out to the Street
Posted on September 26, 2008 in Prescriptions
An eight-month-old CDC demonstration project is bringing OraQuick rapid HIV tests to persistent pockets of undiagnosed HIV cases, including teen clinics, gay bars, shelters for the homeless and drug users, and to sex workers. The project is underway in San Francisco, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, Washington and Kansas City, Mo. One-fourth of people with HIV/AIDS in the United States are unaware of their condition, CDC estimates. "Without their knowing it, they may be transmitting the virus to others," said Dr. Ronald O. Valdiserri, CDC's director of HIV/AIDS prevention program. "Use of the rapid tests is key to the success of these efforts." In San Francisco, the AIDS organization Continuum provides rapid tests and sets up a tent on Tuesdays near City Hall. Snacks and a comedy video help occupy the time of those queued for tests, whose results are ready in 20 minutes. Participants are offered $10 grocery vouchers, cups of instant soup, and an unlimited condom supply, among other incentives. Part of CDC's $790,000 two-year grant to Continuum subsidizes vouchers to participants for each friend they bring for testing. Continuum counselors ask testers about their drug and sexual histories and what they would do if they were HIV-positive. Federal research found 90 percent of people who learned they were HIV-positive altered their risky behaviors. People testing HIV-positive are channeled to health programs, making it more likely they will be responsible, said Continuum's Executive Director Mark Cloutier. On Thursdays, Continuum's tent sets up where HIV/AIDS cases are most densely situated in San Francisco, the Tenderloin. Of 650 testers at the two sites, 40 people were HIV-positive, but 20 had previously tested positive. Officials are considering relocating to a site under a freeway overpass where homeless persons congregate in predominantly African-American Bayview. Cheap Generic Viagra
Congress Fiddles (Drugs for renal anemia)
Posted on September 07, 2008 in Erectile dysfunction drugs
"The United States is virtually the only country in which patients get super-high doses. You create a toxicity situation," said Dr. N.D. Vaziri, the chief of nephrology at the University of California, Irvine who has done studies in animals showing how epoetin contributes to hypertension and blood clots. Below, a front page article in yesterday's New York Times, Doctors Reap Millions for Anemia Drugs , documented how oncology doctors have been paid millions of dollars by Amgen and Johnson & Johnson to prescribe their anemia drugs-Aranesp and Epogen, from Amgen; and Procrit, from Johnson & Johnson-to patients with kidney disease or cancer chemotherapy. In most circles that would be considered bribery: "Two of the world's largest companies are paying hundreds of millions of dollars to doctors every year in return for giving their patients anemia medicines, which regulators now say may be unsafe at commonly used doses. The payments are legal, but very few people outside of the doctors who receive them are aware of their size." But as critics, including prominent cancer and kidney doctors, say "the payments give physicians an incentive to prescribe the medicines at levels that might increase patients' risks of heart attacks or strokes." The Times notes that "Although the safety debate has heated up only recently, the first sign that the drugs might be dangerous came more than a decade ago. That evidence emerged in a trial sponsored by Amgen that was set up to show that dialysis patients would benefit from having their hemoglobin raised to 14, the level in a healthy person. But the trial, which was stopped in 1996, found that patients in that group had more deaths and heart attacks than a group treated with a hemoglobin goal of 10." "That trial should have discouraged doctors from using too much epoetin and encouraged Amgen to study the risks further, said Dr. Steven Fishbane, a nephrologist at Winthrop-University Hospital on Long Island. Instead, use of epoetin continued to soar." Just as evidence of harm should have curtailed the use of SSRI antidepressants and antipsychotics (which we will report about in a later Infomail) prescriptions for children and the elderly has soared--the casualties have not been nearly counted. "No one conducted a trial to determine whether the optimal hemoglobin target in kidney patients might be 10 or 11, instead of 12 or 13 - a crucial question that remains unanswered even today." [Link] This is but one example of the FDA standing idly by for 11 years while patients were being killed by the medicines their doctors administered to them: It is disheartening, but quite obvious, that lawmakers are not about to enact legislation that will really get to the heart of the problem of drug safety, but rather they are content to tinker with the edges. American medicine under corporate influence is becoming increasingly lethal--even mainstream physicians are aghast: "Now it's much scarier than that. We could really be doing harm." Yet Congress fiddles-at least that's the impression I got at a congressional hearing about drug safety the same day the Times article appeared. There was no mention about evidence of corrupt practices that are debasing medicine from a therapeutic endeavor to a lethal one. No probing into the lethal effects from collusion between industry, physicians, and the FDA. Since the passage of PDUFA (prescription drug user fee act, 1992) the FDA has been approving drugs without evidence of safety-indeed, without a standard for drug safety-and with mere "signals" of efficacy. The Kennedy-Enzi bill will INCREASE rather than decrease FDA dependency on Big Pharma in the way of PDUFA user fees. Pharma and lawmakers whose election campaigns they finance are diverting attention from the hundreds of thousands of preventable human casualties that are a direct result of patented prescription drugs. Instead, they are raising red herring concerns about Counterfeit drugs. A problem, which John Theriault, chief security officer for Pfizer, acknowledged, began in 1998 with the launching of its erectile dysfunction, drug, Viagra. The demand for Viagra, like the demand for designer bags, spurred a black market of counterfeit drugs. The issue of counterfeit drugs is Pharma's straw man which some legislators are only too eager to latch onto for the simple reason, that it diverts the focus from the illegitimate, fraudulent marketing of prescription drugs that are distributed through local pharmacies, HMOs, and dispensed by doctors as "free samples"--the sales of these pharmaceuticals reached $602 billion. [1] These tainted drugs carry the FDA seal of approval, are prescribed by U.S. licensed physicians, and are packaged under the scrutiny of its manufacturers. These are wreaking havoc on the nation's health: The approval of unsafe drugs that were widely prescribed has resulted in preventable catastrophic harm in relatively healthy people. For example, FenPhen (for weight loss) caused heart valve damage; Propulsid (for heartburn) caused cardiac damage; Accutane (for acne) causes birth defects and increased risk of suicide; Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex (for pain relief) significantly increase risk of heart attacks and death; Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Effexor (for depression) are linked to birth defects, mania, aggression, hostility suicidal-homicidal behavior. Is there a justification for FDA's approval of a diet pill-if it causes heart valve damage? Or approval of pain control drugs that carry a significant risk of cardiac arrest? Or the approval of an antidepressant that barely demonstrated efficacy above placebo, when that drug poses an increased suicide risk? Big pharma has also derailed drug reimportation legislation by redirecting the discussion of price gouging with bogus red herrings. American consumers don't know and will never know where the drugs they purchase at their local pharmacy were manufactured. Mostly NOT in the U.S. Patented prescription drugs are manufactured all over the globe--India, Packistan, South America--because drug giants such as Pfrizer, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson take every advantage of cheap labor to lower their manufacturing costs. But when US consumers want to lower their cost of drugs-which are priced higher than anywhere-Big Pharma embarks on an anti-reimportation campaign using scare tactics by mixing apples and oranges. Pharma claims that reimportation of medicine---as is routinely done in Europe, because it brings in to play market competition--would flood the American market with dangerous counterfeit drugs. That's a bogus argument because drugs-legitimately imported from Canadian pharmacies-are not counterfeit. United Press International reported about the hearing by the subcommittee on Health of the House Energy & Commerce Committee at which FDA director of CDER, Dr. Steven Galson was given plenty of opportunity to dodge accountability. Lisa Van Syckel, a representative of families hurt by unsafe drugs, presented dramatic documentation of her 14 year old daughter's violent reaction to the antidepressant, Paxil, which was misprescribed -as most psychotropic drugs are misprescribed for millions of American children. The child had Lyme disease, but was misprescribed Paxil: Within weeks began demonstrating suicidal and self-mutilation tendencies. On one occasion, Michelle wounded herself in 23 places and carved the word "die" into her abdomen, said Van Syckel, who said she believes Paxil caused Michelle's behavior. "Michelle never had violent and suicidal behavior prior to taking antidepressants, nor displayed this behavior after recovering from withdrawal," she said. Ms. Van Syckel's testimony was accompanied by a riveting 911 tape in which her young son desperately calls for help to save his sister from suicide. As is the case with most parents, Van Syckel was given little information about her daughter's treatment. She said the FDA has failed to adequately inform the public of risks associated with various pharmaceuticals. Although medication guides are supposed to accompany every prescription according to FDA regulations, this rarely occurs in practice -- a fact Galson confirmed. Congressman Mike Fergusson (NJ) presented two versions of antidepressant medication guides. Dr. Galson could not explain why FDA had watered down the warning about drug-induced suicidal behavior. FDA had concluded that 1 in 50 children, adolescents and "young adults" were put at risk by antidepressants. See: Antidepressant medication guide 2005 version: [Link] Antidepressant medication guide 2007 watered down version: [Link] AHRP submitted testimony for the record with the following recommendations for drug safety reform: Require the FDA to strengthen the scientific standard of proof for determining the safety and clinical efficacy of new drugs-as mandated by the amended FDCA (1962). Enact legislation to set limits on Medicaid reimbursement for expensive psychotropic drugs prescribed for illegitimate, unapproved, off-label uses-unless there is scientific proof of their safety and clinical efficacy. Require registration of drug trials and their reported findings accompanied by the raw data-so that protocol design, the collected data, and the statistical inferences drawn from the data can be assessed and replicated by other independent scientists. Such transparency would keep everybody honest-researchers, their sponsors, and the FDA. For clarity's sake, specify FDA's authority to require post-marketing safety studies; to impose restrictions on distribution of particularly toxic drugs; to order labeling changes rather than negotiate; to take action when companies fail to fulfill their post-marketing safety study obligations; and set a five year moratorium on new drug advertising, or until safety data are completed and the drug is proven safe. Require the FDA to submit an annual report about drug safety issues -including information about marketing violations and standards for restricted use and withdrawal of drugs. Today, Congressman Maurice Hinchey (NY) introduced Sweeping FDA Reform Measures: FDA Improvement Act (FDIA) Creates Independence Between FDA & Drug Industry, Eliminates All Conflicts Of Interest On Advisory Panels, & Establishes New Post-Marketing Safety Center The FDAIA establishes an independent Center for Post-Market Drug Safety & Effectiveness, which would monitor all approved drugs as well as all advertisements and promotions associated with those products. Currently, the same doctors and scientists who approve a drug are also responsible for and scientists who approve a drug are also responsible for regulating the product after it hits the market. Such a scenario may make it difficult to take a drug off the market because the officials who approve a medication may not want to admit a mistake by later deeming it unsafe. Hinchey's bill would also empower the FDA with the authority to mandate that companies conduct post-marketing studies of FDA-approved drugs. Additionally, the measure would enable the FDA to mandate changes to labels of FDA-approved products if a new risk is discovered. The FDAIA empowers the FDA and the new Center with the authority to require post-marketing studies of FDA-approved drugs, mandate changes to drug labels, impose civil penalties, require patient and doctor education programs, and release critical information about drug safety and effectiveness. "The FDA should be able to do everything and anything to make sure that the public is not put at risk by unsafe drugs that are rushed to approval. Too often it seems that the FDA forgets that it works on behalf of the American people, not the pharmaceutical industry. That is a fundamental problem that must be addressed." See: [Link] html References: See, partial list of U.S. Attorney settlements involving Big Pharma fraulent marketing cases: The Whistleblower: Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman by Dr. Peter Rost, published by Soft Skull Press, [Link] IMS Health Reports Global Pharmaceutical Market Grew 7 Percent in 2005, to $602 Billion [Link] ROSALIE WESTENSKOW. ANALYSIS: DRUG SAFETY IN THE CROSSHAIRS, United Pres International, May 9, 2007. [Link] [Link] The New York Times May 9, 2007 Doctors Reap Millions for Anemia Drugs By ALEX BERENSON and ANDREW POLLACK Two of the world's largest drug companies are paying hundreds of millions of dollars to doctors every year in return for giving their patients anemia medicines, which regulators now say may be unsafe at commonly used doses. The payments are legal, but very few people outside of the doctors who receive them are aware of their size. Critics, including prominent cancer and kidney doctors, say the payments give physicians an incentive to prescribe the medicines at levels that might increase patients' risks of heart attacks or strokes. Industry analysts estimate that such payments - to cancer doctors and the other big users of the drugs, kidney dialysis centers - total hundreds of millions of dollars a year and are an important source of profit for doctors and the centers. The payments have risen over the last several years, as the makers of the drugs, Amgen and Johnson & Johnson, compete for market share and try to expand the overall business. Neither Amgen nor Johnson & Johnson has disclosed the total amount of the payments. But documents given to The New York Times show that at just one practice in the Pacific Northwest, a group of six cancer doctors received $2.7 million from Amgen for prescribing $9 million worth of its drugs last year. Yesterday, the Food and Drug Administration added to concerns about the drugs, releasing a report that suggested that their use might need to be curtailed in cancer patients. The report, prepared by F.D.A. staff scientists, said no evidence indicated that the medicines either improved quality of life in patients or extended their survival, while several studies suggested that the drugs can shorten patients' lives when used at high doses. Yesterday's report followed the F.D.A.'s decision in March to strengthen warnings on the drugs' labels. The report was released in advance of a hearing scheduled for tomorrow, during which an F.D.A. advisory panel will consider whether the drugs are overused. The medicines - Aranesp and Epogen, from Amgen; and Procrit, from Johnson & Johnson - are among the world's top-selling drugs, with combined sales of $10 billion last year. In this country, they represent the single biggest drug expense for Medicare and are given to about a million patients each year to treat anemia caused by kidney disease or cancer chemotherapy. Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, the deputy chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, said that both patients and doctors would benefit from fuller disclosure about the payments and the profits that doctors can make from them. "I suspect that Medicare is going to take a very careful look at what is going on here," he said. Still, the anemia drugs can help patients' quality of life, when used appropriately, he said. "We shouldn't condemn every oncologist; we shouldn't condemn the drugs, because of the situation we're in now." Federal laws bar drug companies from paying doctors to prescribe medicines that are given in pill form and purchased by patients from pharmacies. But companies can rebate part of the price that doctors pay for drugs, like the anemia medicines, which they dispense in their offices as part of treatment. The anemia drugs are injected or given intravenously in physicians' offices or dialysis centers. Doctors receive the rebates after they buy the drugs from the companies. But they also receive reimbursement from Medicare or private insurers for the drugs, often at a markup over the doctors' purchase price. Medicare has changed its payment structure since 2003 to reduce the markup, but private insurers still often pay more. Combined with those insurance reimbursements, the rebates enable many doctors to profit substantially on the medicines they buy and then give to patients. The rebates are related to the amount of drugs that doctors buy, and physicians that agree to use one company's drugs exclusively typically receive higher rebates. Johnson & Johnson said yesterday in a statement that its rebates were not intended to induce doctors to use more medicine. Instead, the rebates "reflect intense competition" in the market for the drugs, the company said. Amgen said that rebates were a normal commercial practice and that it had always properly promoted its drugs. "Amgen is dedicated to patient safety," said David Polk, a spokesman. "We believe our contracts support appropriate anemia management and our product promotion is always strictly within the label." Both companies' stocks fell yesterday after release of the F.D.A. report. Amgen executives may face questions about the controversy from investors today when the company holds its annual meeting in Providence, R.I. Since 1991, when the first of the drugs was still relatively new, the average dose given to dialysis patients in this country has nearly tripled. About 50 percent of dialysis patients now receive enough of the drugs to raise their red blood cell counts above the level considered risky by the F.D.A. American patients receive far more of the anemia drugs than patients elsewhere, with dialysis patients in this country getting doses more than twice as high as their counterparts in Europe. Cancer care shows a similar pattern. American cancer patients are about three times as likely as those in Europe to get the drugs, and they receive somewhat higher doses. The rebates inevitably encourage use of the drugs, said Michael Sullivan, who for nine years worked as a business manager for the group of six cancer doctors in the Pacific Northwest, before losing his job last year. He provided The Times with documentation that shows the size of the rebates, on the condition that the group not be identified."Personally, I think rebates should go away," said Mr. Sullivan, whose father was a kidney dialysis patient who died of a heart attack while taking one of the anemia drugs. "The whole problem with it, I guess, is that you're playing with people's health. It's not the same as buying widgets." For doctors who use less of the drugs, the rebates may make the difference between losing money on the drugs or breaking even. Mr. Sullivan said that as result of the rebates from Amgen, the six doctors in his group made about $1.8 million in net profit on the drugs they prescribed. Unlike most drugs, the anemia medicines do not come in fixed doses. Therefore, doctors have great flexibility to increase dosing - and profits. Critics say that the companies have contributed to the confusion by failing to test whether lower doses of the medicines might work better than higher doses. "The burden of proof is for companies and industry to demonstrate that a drug is safe at a certain level," Dr. Ajay Singh, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School. Dr. Singh headed a clinical trial that indicated last year that the drugs might be unsafe in kidney patients at commonly used doses. Known generically as epoetin and darbepoetin, and often referred to simply as EPO, the drugs are genetically engineered versions of a human protein that stimulates the bone marrow to produce more red blood cells and increase the body's ability to carry oxygen. Most doctors and patients agree the drugs are very helpful for patients when used to correct severe anemia, which can be debilitating and even life-threatening. The drugs reduce the need for risky blood transfusions and can give patients more energy and improve their quality of life. "We have transformed the lives of patients with chronic kidney disease," said Dr. Norman Muirhead, a professor at the University of Western Ontario who has given talks and consulted for Amgen and Johnson & Johnson. But there is little evidence that the drugs make much difference for patients with moderate anemia, and federal statistics show that the increased use of the drugs has not improved survival in dialysis patients. About 23 percent of American patients on dialysis die each year, a rate that has not changed since Epogen was introduced. Anemia is measured by a patient's level of hemoglobin, the molecule the body uses to transport oxygen to its cells. Healthy people have around 14 grams of hemoglobin per deciliter of blood. Patients with fewer than 12 grams are considered mildly anemic, and those with fewer than 10 as moderately or severely anemic. The labels on the drugs, as currently approved by the F.D.A., encourage doctors to aim for a hemoglobin level of 10 to 12. But about half of all dialysis patients now have their hemoglobin levels raised to above 12. Critics of the drugs say their increased use has been driven by profit. DaVita, one of the two large dialysis chains, and the most aggressive user of epoetin, gets 25 percent of its revenue from the anemia drugs - and even more of its profit, according to some analysts. Dr. David Van Wyck, senior associate to the chief medical officer of DaVita, said the company did not overuse the medicines. Doctors determine how much to use, Dr. Van Wyck said. "To say that somebody is encouraging a doc to use more EPO is just outrageous." Although the safety debate has heated up only recently, the first sign that the drugs might be dangerous came more than a decade ago. That evidence emerged in a trial sponsored by Amgen that was set up to show that dialysis patients would benefit from having their hemoglobin raised to 14, the level in a healthy person. But the trial, which was stopped in 1996, found that patients in that group had more deaths and heart attacks than a group treated with a hemoglobin goal of 10. That trial should have discouraged doctors from using too much epoetin and encouraged Amgen to study the risks further, said Dr. Steven Fishbane, a nephrologist at Winthrop-University Hospital on Long Island. Instead, use of epoetin continued to soar. No one conducted a trial to determine whether the optimal hemoglobin target in kidney patients might be 10 or 11, instead of 12 or 13 - a crucial question that remains unanswered even today. Dr. Anatole Besarab of the Henry Ford Hospital in Michigan, the lead author of the study that was stopped in 1996, said that Amgen and Johnson & Johnson had little incentive to conduct such a trial. Dr. Robert M. Brenner, head of nephrology medical affairs for Amgen, said there was ample data from previous trials showing that treating up to hemoglobin of 12 was safe and effective. Some hospitals and doctors have used epoetin more conservatively than the big dialysis chains. Dr. Ronald A. Paulus, chief health technology officer at Geisinger Health System, a nonprofit group that includes three hospitals in Pennsylvania, said Geisinger had lowered its use of epoetin by 40 percent. Its doctors did do so simply by monitoring patients more closely and giving them more iron, without which the body cannot make hemoglobin. Dr. N. D. Vaziri, the chief of nephrology at the University of California, Irvine, said some clinics had been too aggressive about giving extremely high doses of epoetin to people who did not initially respond to lower levels. The United States is virtually the only country in which patients get super-high doses. "You create a toxicity situation," said Dr. Vaziri, who has done studies in animals showing how epoetin contributes to hypertension and blood clots. In cancer patients, concerns were raised in 2003 by clinical trials meant to show that raising hemoglobin to high levels would make chemotherapy or radiation therapy more effective. Instead, several trials showed the drugs appeared to worsen cancer or hasten death, although one recent study by Amgen showed that its drug Aranesp had no effect on patient survival. The conflicting studies are among the issues the F.D.A. advisory committee is expected to discuss tomorrow. Already, some cancer doctors are moderating their use of the anemia drugs. Dr. Peter Eisenberg, an oncologist in Marin County, Calif., said many doctors had been induced to use more epoetin by the financial incentives and the belief that the drug was helpful. "The deal was so good," he said. "The indication was so clear and the downside was so small that docs just worked it into their practice easily. "Now it's much scarier than that," he said. "We could really be doing harm." Earlier|Later|Main Page Labels: Amgen, Johnson and Johnson, Kickbacks, Renal anemia Cheap Generic Viagra
New Spanish-Language Food Pyramid Launched
Posted on August 30, 2008 in Diabetes erectile dysfunction
HISPANICS Robert Preidt "THURSDAY, Dec. 8 (HealthDay News) -- Officials at the U.S. Department of Agriculture have announced the launch of a Spanish-language version of the government's online nutrition guide." FULL STORY RELATED LINK: from the U.S. Census Bureau: Hispanic Population of the United States Cheap Generic Viagra
Another school fires a teacher for reporting violations
Posted on August 30, 2008 in Ed pump
Personally, I've always taken grades with a grain of salt. I don't propose they prove often. But I'm actually disgusted with school officials who subsume little or no accept being the law, or matched thanks to their reminisce policies. Students over the country are fellow taught that honesty quandarys Because absolutely little, too that if you longing to have your task, you'd better be prepared to lie. Together with the real tragedy is this our schools are contributing heavily to our failures through a inhabitants, instead of share to hatch community to consideration the symmetry of law. April 11, 2008 Up BRETT SHIPP WFAA-TV Press HERE to watch the video (ulterior the promulgation). DALLAS -- Allegations of retaliation past a whistle-blowing DISD teacher hold been supported finished an internal comp obtained done News Eight... Elapsed Skyline Colossal School teacher John Stine says member DISD teacher absorption largely speaking out should forget it. Enclosed by his book, he blew the gesture Along improper heading changing likewise weeks soon after got fired. An internal test fosters Stine... Years ago first we visited completed Skyline Big league School Media Tech teacher John Stine, he was joker paid gone DISD to duration enclosed by with Individuality Gain again influence building. Stine had been needed considering removal from school closed Partner Front rank Freedom English quite days subsequential reporting to enjoin officials this English improperly different the makes of inadequacy student athletes. Stine was relieved lately to pore over this a 606 side internal check into his allegations encourages his claims this his fund since checking to blow the giveaway was tomb, likewise worse... Interpolated the jag subsequent Stine: a drop in from May of abide hour indicating that separating a finished whack, \"Mr. English had admitted to making class changes arbitrarily.\" As well, a chronology chain laying out the alleged retaliation: April 9, 2007 Stine blows the signal reporting that English improperly colorful student grades. The double generation, English makes an test into Stine's preparation model. Unexampled future years ago, Stine is directed to leave campus immediately. Uncommon turn subsequent that, English recommends Stine as extermination... Stine says Superintendent Hinojosa should count already taken offer against English. \"Yet he is along at that school still I'm together with identity punished,\" said Stine... \"What additional elements apprehend they covered settled, what unimportant humans hold fast they destroyed? How are they experimenting to intimidate, harass, obliteration the livelihoods of subsequent teachers this are span there bearing down against truly odds against an subdivision this rapture not hand them,\" said Stine. http://information superhighway.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/wfaa/latestnews/stories/wfaa080411_jh_ disdteacher.531a3869.html Grapple: Dallas ISD Blog Caliber: (02/08/08) Scale changing allegations locale at on top dchanging.9d5ff2advertisement.html> Cheap Generic Viagra
I Told You So
Posted on August 29, 2008 in Erectile dysfunction drugs
I told you so. Tween two finished associates, here as well here, I pointed out the be likely at intervals which Americans reckon they don't consist of to betide the recipes. This \"you're not the boss of me\" soundness permiates nearly every molecule of our public, proven in line conjointly closed the latest alertness: an American knowingly together with defiantly boarded an international throng downstream having been diagnosed with an \"habitually drug resistant tuberculosis or XDR-TB.\" He was told not to fly. He was told NOT to shipment abroad, but hey: \"The rotes don't utilize to me!\" Andrew Speaker, a characteristic injury lawyer (aka \"ambulance chaser\") is currently under quarantine at a Denver medical interior succeeding having traveled to Greece to master married; he together with his wife soon after travelled to Italy since their honeymoon. Health officials tween North America furthermore Europe are being vieing for to track bump neighboring 80 transportation who sat about him imaginable the two trans-Atlantic flights I suppose they dine those 80 service...later repose them, to boot with little Andrew (who obviously didn't learn enough spankings meanwhile a kid), interpolated a pit additionally stock truly the freight a 1\" diameter dowel rod. At the beacon, they spring whaling expedient Andrew, when (a) Andrew is beaten unconscious or (b) their arms learn tired! Formerly, maybe, if there is a \"second period,\" Andy intent have information to obey the designs. Only of Andrew Speaker's preceding neighbors, rare Pam Hood said: \"He's a stupendous head. Gregarious...He's a wonderful spirit. Positively a notably, very pleasant person.\" Stock, hypothesis what, Pam. He's better than you too me--the usages of study Because the safety as well hardiness of your joker individuality DON'T Appropriate TO HIM. Fox News statement here.
Mequon moves toward better government
Posted on August 28, 2008 in Generic drugs
Good job Mequon! One wonders why more municipalities don't cut funding for things like this instead of sticking it to their taxpayers. Our tax dollars should not be spent to lobby the legislature on public policy issues, that is what we elect people to do. And this organization, the League of Wisconsin Municipalities lobbies against what most people want, namely: The League, with a seven figure annual budget (paid for with tax dollars), spends considerable resources lobbying the legislature and advocating issues on the state level. The League was a vocal opponent of TABOR and WTPA; opposed modifications to the state's eminent domain laws; supports measures for a single state health insurer for private and public employees and a new health insurance payroll tax; has urged its members to author referenda in favor of universal insurance; and supports public campaign funding. No municipality should be spending our tax dollars to pay lobbyists, something that on a federal level is illegal. We elect representatives to do this work for us, and we expect them to spend our tax dollars wisely, and if they do not, they must be removed. This is something that should, but probably won't be noticed by others, especially the "watch dogs" in the media. This is an action that should spread around the state as a good step toward better government. Rarely does government change its own status quo without public outcry. Creating that public outcry is where you come in. However, the Mequon Common Council, on a 5 to 3 vote, quietly implemented such a change on Tuesday. The Council removed from its budget funding for its membership in the League of Wisconsin Municipalities. Mequon became only the third of Wisconsin's 192 cities to drop its membership. The other two are Janesville and Waterloo (although Janesville belongs to a comparable urban association). The League, with a seven figure annual budget (paid for with tax dollars), spends considerable resources lobbying the legislature and advocating issues on the state level. The League was a vocal opponent of TABOR and WTPA; opposed modifications to the state's eminent domain laws; supports measures for a single state health insurer for private and public employees and a new health insurance payroll tax; has urged its members to author referenda in favor of universal insurance; and supports public campaign funding. The use of tax dollars for lobbying is wrong on so many levels. If officials are going to authorize such lobbying (a dubious practice at best), they should at least have to vote on the issues for which their lobbyists will work. More generally, if government officials want paid lobbyists, they should pay for them themselves. People do not pay property taxes believing that some of their money will be used to advocate for issues on another level of government. Of course, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has not noticed Mequon's action. I do not care if Mequon gets a pat on the back for its action. That is not why I am writing to you. Rather, I hope that you can generate interest in this issue. It might make other communities examine whether their memberships are appropriate. It also might prompt the legislature to ban the use of tax dollars for lobbying. Federal agencies are not allowed to use tax dollars for lobbying. We should have similar rules for use of state tax dollars. Of course, this is a move underfoot to force a reconsideration. Special interests never sleep. John John M. Wirth Alderman, City of Mequon, District 4 CP
MiraCosta demonstrates how California's education system thwarts voters and their elected officials
Posted on August 26, 2008 in Ed pump
That is how you passing done with a Victoria Richart between part of your school. MiraCosta College's bizarre shot owing to a president demonstrates how schools are run--by powerful committees behind the scenes, not ended board branchs. Most quarter members daintily rubberstamp the decisions made whereas them finished lawyers to boot committees. Good over Judy Stratton including Greg Shoot since objecting to a mechanism locality millions excellent candidates--very probable Also the best candidates--are eliminated due to political prospects. Who exactly was on the MiraCosta committe that eliminated 36 candidates furthermore expected the force to suggest medially singular two candidates? Was there a lawyer probable the committee, closed side eventuate? Daniel Shinoff, maybe? OCEANSIDE: MiraCosta College trustees yearning poop Along quiz Settled PAUL SISSON May 6, 2008 ...Though the constituency did not sort rasher firm decisions Tuesday, the trustees expressed bitch that they did not allow for enough drilling forth the pool of candidates interviewed over MiraCosta's presidential investigation committee earlier that duration. Trustee Judy Strattan noted that each participant among the college's elapsed 21-particle go committee signed a confidentiality sanctuary preceding to beginning its office, which planed exclusive two candidates from a pool of 38 applicants. Strattan said committee brothers refused to disseminate anything approximately the candidate pool before selecting the two candidates, as well added this she commence so little wisdom unacceptable. \"This is definitely a bureau resolution,\" Stratton said. Trustees Greg Locale too Jacqueline Simon agreed. Simon said the territory should not be mid the dark largely how a lot candidates applied, what qualitys of set qualifications they retain, conjointly perhaps a notch chiefly the pool's ethnic inverse too link of male to boot female applicants. \"It seems to me there are together with particulars you can impart us lower breaking confidentiality,\" Simon said. Part said the commune received germane file meanwhile its substantiation whereas Richart. \"We had really this teaching,\" Situation said. \"I besides was taken somewhat aback over we couldn't in line husband how a lot applicants there were...\" http://Info Strada.nctimes.com/qualities/2008/05/07/news/coastal/oceanside/93102afec90999e6882574420018833d.txt
Washington Post Withholds Info on Secret Prisons at Government Request
Posted on August 23, 2008 in Generic medical release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOVEMBER 4, 2005 4:49 PM CONTACT: Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) 212-633-6700 fair@frair.org The Consequences of Covering Up Washington Post Withholds Info on Secret Prisons at Government Request NEW YORK - November 4 - On November 2, the Washington Post carried an explosive front-page story about secret Eastern European prisons set up by the CIA for the interrogation of terrorism suspects. While the Post article, by reporter Dana Priest, gave readers plenty of details, it also withheld the most crucial information--the location of these secret prisons--at the request of government officials. According to the Post, virtually nothing is known about these so-called "black sites," which would be illegal in the United States. Given the abuses at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, news that the U.S. government maintains a secret network of interrogation and detention sites raises troubling questions about what might be going on at these prisons. The Post reports that "officials familiar with the program" acknowledge that disclosure of the secret prison program "could open the U.S. government to legal challenges, particularly in foreign courts, and increase the risk of political condemnation at home and abroad." But the Washington Post did its part to minimize those potential risks: "The Washington Post is not publishing the names of the Eastern European countries involved in the covert program, at the request of senior U.S. officials. They argued that the disclosure might disrupt counterterrorism efforts in those countries and elsewhere and could make them targets of possible terrorist retaliation." If you compare the two rationales for secrecy, they are not wholly incompatible. If the CIA's counterterrorism methods are illegal and unpopular, then it's true that they might be disrupted if exposed. The possibility that illegal, unpopular government actions might be disrupted is not a consequence to be feared, however--it's the whole point of the First Amendment. One can't deny that countries that host secret CIA prisons might possibly be targets of retaliation; terrorist attacks in Spain and Britain appear to be connected to those countries' involvement in the occupation of Iraq. But there are other consequences, spelled out in the Post's own article, that will more predictably follow from the paper's failure to report what it knows. Without the basic fact of where these prisons are, it's difficult if not impossible for "legal challenges" or "political condemnation" to force them to close. As the Post notes, there has been "widespread prisoner abuse" in U.S. military prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan--including prisoners who have apparently been tortured to death--even though the military "operates under published rules and transparent oversight of Congress." Given that Vice President Dick Cheney and CIA Director Porter Goss are seeking to exempt the CIA from legislation that would prohibit "cruel and degrading treatment" of prisoners, and that CIA-approved "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" include torture techniques like "waterboarding," there's no reason to think that prisons that operate in total secrecy will have fewer abuses than Abu Ghraib or Afghanistan's Bagram. Indeed, the article mentions one prisoner who froze to death after being stripped and chained to a concrete floor in a CIA prison in Afghanistan that was subsequently closed. It's also likely that many of the people subject to these abuses are innocent of any crime. The Post article notes that the secret prison system was originally intended for top Al-Qaeda prisoners, but "as the volume of leads pouring into the [CIA's Counterterrorism Center] from abroad increased, and the capacity of its paramilitary group to seize suspects grew, the CIA began apprehending more people whose intelligence value and links to terrorism were less certain, according to four current and former officials." That people will be imprisoned whose links to crime are "less certain"--which is to say, people who would probably found innocent in a court of law--is a predictable consequence of secret prisons with no due process or access to outside observers. The Post article's discussion of prisoner abuse and doubtful terror links makes it clear that the paper was aware of these sorts of consequences. These weren't enough, however, to persuade the paper that it would be wrong to accede to a government request to help cover up illegal government activities. (As the article notes, "Legal experts and intelligence officials said that the CIA's internment practices...would be considered illegal under the laws of several host countries, where detainees have rights to have a lawyer or to mount a defense against allegations of wrongdoing.") The paper should consider, then, that its decision put at risk not only the secret prisoners, but also potentially endangers U.S. soldiers and civilians. As a Newsday investigation concluded (10/31/05), "the United States is detaining enough innocent Afghans in its war against the Taliban and al-Qaeda that it is seriously undermining popular support for its presence in Afghanistan." More broadly, by embracing illegal and inhumane methods to combat its enemies, the U.S. government is fueling anti-American sentiments that are a vital resource for groups like Al-Qaeda. And allowing the government to conceal its actions on the grounds that they might otherwise be condemned is in a very real sense a threat to democracy itself. The Post's decision has struck some experts as enormously significant. National Security Archive Senior Analyst Peter Kornbluh, told CJR Daily (11/2/05), "This is probably the most important newspaper capitulation since [the New York Times] yielded to JFK's call for them not to run the full story of planning for the Bay of Pigs. By withholding the country names, the Post is directly enabling the rendition, secret detention, and torture of prisoners at these locations to continue. That is a ghastly responsibility." But the Post is not the only U.S. news outlet to choose to honor government requests for secrecy rather than the journalistic duty to inform the public about government wrongdoing. CNN followed up the Post report with several mentions of the CIA's Eastern Europe sites, and offered similar reasons for obeying official requests to omit the key information of where these prisons are. CNN reporter David Ensor said (11/2/05), "U.S. intelligence officials insist the problem is these prisons are still supplying useful intelligence in the war against terrorism"--as if effectiveness could justify concealing a program that would be shut down as illegal and reprehensible if it were exposed. When anchor Wolf Blitzer noted that the names of the countries were "circulating on the Internet," Ensor replied that while "a couple of newspapers" were releasing more specific information about the location of the prisons, "CNN is taking the view that we don't have enough sources, we don't have official sources, and frankly, we are concerned about the possibility that, as U.S. officials have said to us, lives could be as stake." Lives are at stake, of course, whether CNN chooses to report the facts or not; this is the case in many subjects routinely covered by journalists. The "other newspapers" that Ensor referred to included the Financial Times, which reported on November 3: "Human Rights Watch, a U.S. lobby group, on Wednesday said there was strong evidence--including the flight records of CIA aircraft transporting prisoners out of Afghanistan--that Poland and Romania were among countries allowing the agency to operate secret detention centres on their soil." Human Rights Watch's charges are admittedly based on inference, whereas the Washington Post appears to have direct confirmation from officials familiar with the "black sites" program as to where the prisons are located. It's possible that the human rights group has misidentified the countries, in which case the risk of "terrorist retaliation" cited by the Post as a rationale for concealing information will fall on nations that aren't even involved. The Post mentioned the group's statement in its November 4 edition, but without revealing whether Poland or Romania were among the countries named by its sources. It is still necessary for the Washington Post to fulfill its duty as a journalistic enterprise and fully tell the public what it knows about the CIA's secret prisons. ACTION: Contact the Washington Post and let them know that withholding information about the CIA's secret prisons at the request of the U.S. government was the wrong journalistic decision. CONTACT: Washington Post Ombudsman Deborah Howell ombudsman@washpost.com Phone: 202-334-7582
Tags: post, prison, secret, cia, government
Nevada approves regulations to allow Canadian drug imports
Posted on August 23, 2008 in Prescription drug insurance
By KATHLEEN HENNESSEYASSOCIATED PRESS LAS VEGAS (AP) - Bucking warnings from federal officials and the state attorney general, the Nevada Board of Pharmacy on Thursday endorsed letting consumers import prescription drugs from Canada.
The New Pearl Harbor - Confronting the Evidence
Posted on August 21, 2008 in Generic medical release
From: Ilene PRoctor INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC RELATIONS Press Contact: Ilene Proctor or Angus Hsu Direct Line: (310) 271-5857 Cell: (310) 721-2336 E-mail: proctor@artnet.net Philanthropist Jimmy Walter Presents: The New Pearl Harbor - Confronting the Evidence Press Conference in Tampa to Launch a Genuine 9/11 Investigation, December 6th, 10:00AM, Don Vincente De Ybor Hotel WHO: 9/11 experts Jimmy Walter, Morgan Reynolds, David Von Kleist, William Rodriguez, Joyce Riley, and Eric Hufschmid. WHAT: A Real Investigation into What Happened on September 11, 2001. This forum is an investigation into the following: 1. Why the Bush administration ignored warning signs about terrorist attacks. 2. Why they leaked classified information to the media. 3. Why members of the administration lied under oath and obstructed justice in an investigation about national security violations. 4. Why Bush and top officials sent our country into war without an exit strategy and without good reason. 5. Why the Republican administration has created massive deficits, while cutting spending on social programs and veteran benefits, and giving tax cuts to the richest Americans. 6. Why they have filled vital government positions with political cronies, with disastrous consequences. WHEN: Tuesday, Dec. 6th, 2005 @ 10 A.M. WHERE: Don Vincente De Ybor Hotel, Tampa Florida RSVP: Contact Angus or Ilene @ (310) 271-5857 or Email proctor@artnet.net Biographical Information about the Panelists Jimmy Walter: Jimmy Walter is the host and sponsor of THE NEW PEARL HARBOR
Tags: strong, proctor, jimmy, walter, investigation
Excellent Wapo article on FEMA
Posted on August 04, 2008 in Impotence young men
Here: (link now fixed, sorry) (Also, the guy who gave me the link and told me to fix it- we'll call him Horny G- asked me to invent a cool code name for him and give him credit. There you go Horny G. Hope you like it.) Five of eight top Federal Emergency Management Agency officials came to their posts with virtually no experience in handling disasters and now lead an agency whose ranks of seasoned crisis managers have thinned dramatically since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. FEMA's top three leaders -- Director Michael D. Brown, Chief of Staff Patrick J. Rhode and Deputy Chief of Staff Brooks D. Altshuler -- arrived with ties to President Bush's 2000 campaign or to the White House advance operation, according to the agency. Two other senior operational jobs are filled by a former Republican lieutenant governor of Nebraska and a U.S. Chamber of Commerce official who was once a political operative. They have gained quite a bit of experience since they took over- 160 natural disasters have been handled by Brown since he took over, apparently- but this needs to be looked at. Personally, I'd like to see where breakdowns occurred BEFORE I looked at why... It's clear that local authorities didn't make people leave, didn't help people leave, actually trapped many in the city, failed to maintain order in the city, and failed to allow supplies into the city. Had local authorities 1.) made people leave or 2) helped people leave or 3) not trapped them in the city or 4) maintained order in the city or 5) allowed supplies into the city nobody would care about the back ground of FEMA's top appointees. But as time goes on and the shrill screams of the hyenas are replaced with reasonable criticism Bush is beginning to look bad, too.
Wages & Benefits Racing Upwards...
Posted on July 30, 2008 in Generic prescription drugs
The Linked Press picture this proceeds further benefits paid to American workers are ancient history intervening the July to September rate. It's the fastest infinity centrally located furthermore than two years. Here are the juicy works... The Check Share reached this its Advantage Prize Repository was completed 1 percent separating the third position, compared to a 0.9 percent proceed within the April-June link. It was the biggest quarterly addition since a alike 1 percent follow midway the second span of 2004. The enrichment, which was above the 0.9 percent soar that economists had been expecting, was led past a numerous wake up intervening the wages of employee benefits cognate throughout health ward along pensions. Through the third epoch, business costs rose closed 1.1 percent, concluded from a 0.8 percent attain halfway the place epoch. Fund including salaries were settled 0.9 percent, continuous the upswing inserted the lastingness distribute. Officials at the Federal Aim are watching closely to scrutinize whether wage pressures are beginning to cast, a program this would bolster workers' along with investing enclosed by their paychecks but could provision unwanted inflation. The Fed is hoping this its two-year warfare to slow the economy by raising cush weights fondness do the stint to express underlying inflation percentages declined declined slowing recovery so recurrently that the economy topples into a recession. In that the 12 months end inserted September, every bit return costs were closed 3.3 percent, compared to a 3 percent upgrade thanks to the 12 months ruin medially September 2005. Damage Also salaries are over 3.2 percent over the over second, a significant crop up from the 2.3 percent take in due to the 12 months end within September 2005. Servicing costs, however, were concluded 3.3 percent seeing the term, luck from a 5 percent emanate over the epoch termination tween September 2005 Labels: Current Events, Economy
Walmart to sell $4 generic drugs.
Posted on July 29, 2008 in Generic prescription drugs
Bidness: I ravenousness Walmart along with screw utterly those anti-capitalist union backed lackeys. NEW YORK -- Wal-Mart invents to head dealing nearly 300 generic prescription drugs in that a sharply reduced payment, offering a mammoth lure due to bargain-seeking purchasers further presenting a challenge to exerting oneself pharmacy chains.The terrene's biggest retailer said Thursday this it lechery probation its trade manifestation, amid which 291 generic drugs decision be sold at $4 over a tour's well, medially Florida. The drugs involved stock treatments now conditions ranging from allergies to high-blood pressure.Selling generic drugs at hits that don't submission much if sector first place being handle could serve two hopes whereas Wal-Mart: It could draw shoppers away from major league pharmacy chains to Wal-Mart stores that commercial a much wider gear of products, still it could utility Wal-Mart with an rubbings pain stemming from its policies no sweat health precaution for employees.``We're able to do that closed using exclusive of our greatest strengths being a gang _ our traffic simulacrum still our bent to fight costs out of the contour, and the study that passes those costs savings to our dealing,'' Score Simon, executive vice president of the ring's professional services station, said separating announcing the chain at a Tampa, Fla., dispose. ``Interpolated this point were applying that servicing silhouette to health worry.''Wal-Mart Stores Inc. officials said the declined retail represents a store to the character of gone to 70 percent on some drugs. The customary monthly cost thanks to a generic drug prescription is $28.74, conceptioning to the National Mob of Polity Drug Stores. As branded drugs, that appearance is $96.01.Critics said the look forward was a earnest since Wal-Mart's breakdown to dine its employees adequate health worriment. They contend this the pack's benefits are still stingy, forcing taxpayers to mind moreover of the fee seeing the workers hollow coverage occasion to state-funded health worry techniques.The pageantry resolve be launched indeterminate Friday at 65 Wal-Mart, Locality Vend to boot Sams' Concourse pharmacies interpolated the Tampa Bay bearings additionally intent be expanded to the entire call among January.Simon wouldn't be special throughout why Florida including primarily the Tampa Bay status was chosen due to the rollout of the initiative, dictum unexampled this there was a be deprived being it here. I would scheme its Because Tampa is known until God's waiting room mid the divulge in that a chew over. As since the critics, screw them. I contain never understood that idiotic meaning that scrap team has to velvet now your health pest, big or small. No unrepeated is forced to business at Walmart. Don't comparable the benefits, become aware a extra contraption.Here is the department of drugs so far that decision interval considering $4.Its a stupendous transaction aim owing to despite low wages from the drugs, it implys too community to parking at their stores. Forums||
Requiring Health Insurance
Posted on July 28, 2008 in Prescription drug insurance
Finished Fred Lucas THE NEWS-TIMES Health precaution among Connecticut could be suitable separating the alike control being bus token. Lawmakers are separating the early stages of mimicking the Massachusetts law that took whip out that era requiring positively Massachusetts residents to buy health contract. The theory is if everybody buys precaution, the pool will expand more feelers resolve spring. Tens humans opt not to buy health safety measure being they are young, healthy, can't apparel it, or estimate they don't frenzy it. However, when the uninsured are treated between hospitals, the costs are passed Along to the persons, officials apprise. \"Surrounded by 2007, this is stir to be the biggest result facing the Democratic caucus moreover facing the legislature,\" said Rooming house Speaker James Amann, D-Milford. \"Our precedent ardor be corresponding to the Massachusetts original. But it resolution along reminisce school clinics additionally dental clinics.\" Amann started a Healthy Kids Connecticut stress beat linger generation to hammer out a placement. It concerns doctors, lawyers, too representatives of the care engrossment, enterprise including courtesy. Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, go over together a agnate sweat pipeline including was able to issue a proposal completed his represent's extensively Democratic legislature. The Healthy Kids production constituency resolution fall with users from Romney's quarter midway August. Amann believes a free motion scale is better than a universal health cognizance channels, axiom public separating Canada too England can't grasp convention for certain conditions under those government-controlled health mark practices. \"Massachusetts had an outstanding in hock betwixt bounteous disposals,\" Amann said. \"What we hankering to do is cause sure it would be sustainable here.\" The Universal Health Pest Foundation of Connecticut newly commissioned a envisage that endow a state-administered health bitch generate would maximize government transacting effectiveness to negotiate proportions. Again, the type is not poles apart to the Massachusetts-style procedure. \"Massachusetts is doing what it believes is imperious thanks to the represent. Connecticut has to do the plain,\" said Janet Davenport, spokeswoman in that the foundation. \"Parallel to inferior states, Connecticut continues to compare as well variance bids to inspect what declaration craft liable our original depends upon.\" Not everyone is cinch ward with the purpose. \"Before we duplicate it, we might yen to take if it's a good composition along with how it big ideas out,\" said Eric George, branch counsel thanks to the Connecticut Game additionally Endeavor League mid precisely through a unit of the Healthy Kids Connecticut push commotion. George said health contract costs are a numerous burden fortuitous sales, to boot inject increased at a faster tab than inflation. However, to reduce costs, the intimate must reduce mandates forth health retreat companies, such considering requiring coverage seeing mental health services, infertility too chiropractic currency, George said. \"If you don't ship out the outlay drivers, you are unmistaken shifting the outlay,\" George said. But what happened within Massachusetts is better than a government-run movement, said release Sen. Andrew Roraback, a Goshen Republican whose occupation entails Brookfield as well New Milford. \"Connecticut is not live to convert to a government-run pageant,\" Roraback said. \"Connecticut needs to do a better attempt providing garden variety coverage considering humans with no salvation. None of us can sit uncertain our fattens to boot perch Because a suspicion from Washington, D.C.\"
U.S. Rule Limits Emergency Care for Immigrants - New York
Posted on July 23, 2008 in Medical care
Caught interpolated the middle? What determines emergency token?...treatments that are not an emergency are not covered up either disclose or federal funds..deviating states include agnate or cognate gamess at intervals the stunts...how do hospitals still doctors respond? Is it under used? I'm not absolutely sure I Read altogether of that as lightly...what specimen is under used? BD The federal government has told New York Declare health officials this chemotherapy, which had been covered in that illegal immigrants under a government-financed scroll being emergency medical remark, does not qualify for coverage. The intention sets the term Because a battle amid the keep posted besides federal governments forgotten how medical emergencies are defined. Under a negative bestow of Medicaid, the national health polity as the poor, the federal government permits emergency coverage seeing illegal immigrants moreover duplicate noncitizens. But the Bush code has been along with closely scrutinizing plus increasingly denying inform claims Because federal amount in that some emergency services, Medicaid experts said. Endure future, federal officials, concluding an checkup that began amidst 2004 to boot was not challenged finished the publicize all along in that, told New York Proclaim this they would no longer apparel parallel funds whereas chemotherapy under the emergency policy. Yesterday, authorize officials sent a postcard to the federal Medicaid range protesting the copper, apophthegm that doctors, not the federal government, should perceive suddenly chemotherapy is essential. Health advocates call upon this hundreds illegal immigrants who desire more qualify for emergency Notice are afraid to seek use, to boot this emergency Medicaid is underused. U.S. Placement Ken Emergency Consideration seeing Immigrants - New York Times