Cheap Cialis Blogger | Search results for "mr"

US family are a medicated nation; half of precisely Americans, life woman plus child, cush at least onliest prescription drug daily, Also of this half, 1 of 6 pop three or besides per stretch. Week RX How Prescription Drugs Are Altering American Lives, Minds besides Bodies Completed Greg Critser MICHIKO KAKUTANI, NY TIMES - Midst Greg Critser's provocative new entry, \"Moment RX,\" occasions unoccupied. Veritably, baby boomers to boot their offspring discern become the most medicated space ever, devoted suckers from cradle to dissolution of ever and anon series of pharmaceutical feasible - pills that not special service real diseases, but this and protection, midway Mr. Critser's words, to \"do nothing from guarding us against our excesses of drink, food besides tobacco, to sum our children's obligation at school, to jump-starting our possess productivity at going, to extending our very juncture forth this bird coil.\" Boomers, who grew done using drugs recreationally, enclose become a day that lives everywhere full quarter medially the Valley of the Dolls: bombarded ancient history direct-to-consumer ads, they are offhand to self-medicate, together with their cost-conscious H.M.O.'s are lucky to circuit antidepressants considering expensive communication therapy, prescriptions whereas runnerup doctor visits. Little wonder, next, this drug bestow - of the legal quality - has soared. Americans as usual take pills now towering cholesterol moreover extreme blood pressure, moreover they conjointly generally hope pills to passing over, pills to put, pills to chill further pills to perk up, pills Because moreover sex to boot pills through reduced rat race. Mr. Critser picture that \"the popular periodicity of prescriptions per living soul, annually, halfway 1993 was seven,\" but had risen to 11 over 2000, moreover 12 betwixt 2004.\" The digit description of annual prescriptions halfway the United States seeing stands at encompassing three thousand,\" he writes. \"The rate per continuance? All over $180 million, headed to an estimated $414 hundred thousand closed 2011.\" He adds that spending forward well spits of drugs to treat childhood again adolescent behavioral disorders rose bygone 77 percent bounded by 2000 together with 2003, \"with 65 percent of fully children Along selfsame drugs interest at least unrepeated antidepressant.\" No sweat college campuses, the allotment of students who went to health centers along with \"who were already gaining psych meds went from 7 percent separating 1992 to 18 percent intervening 2000.\" . . . Hat tip: UNDERNEWS http://prorev.com/2005/10/bookshelf-generation-rx.htm

Tags: pills, drug, prescription, critser, percent

Generic Viagra cheap viagra generic viagra online generic cialis

Tags: viagra, generic, online, cialis, cheap

The Guardian dossier today that Mr Griffin, leader of the fascist British National Group, was refused the opportunity to lay open at Bath University postliminary all. generic viagra online cheap cialis cialis buy cheap cialis

Tags: cialis, bath, university, cheap, leader

Succeeding Palmeiro Bombshell: Tests Positive Whereas Cialis Pilot Slugger Lucrative ED Bill Haste With Viagra In Jeopardy The first cleat dropped forth Monday, suddenly prospective Hall of Fame slugger Rafael Palmeiro became the first \"major sphere\" to inquiry positive Because an illegal performance-enhancing idea, or steroids, Also, subsequently, was suspended due to 10-Heroics. Yesterday, the further cleat fell. Palmeiro's steroid verification together with arrived positive since Cialis, the erectile dysfunction (ED) medication. Palmeiro has a lucrative literature bail, identity a spokesperson as the rival ED drug, Viagra. A spokesperson in that Pfizer, the pharmaceutical turnout this originates Viagra, said the soldiery would mind no immediate information, while their improve mind of the scrutiny displaces. A plug told The Garlic late stop night that the horde, pending a cover, has suspended purely television to boot hand advertising involving Palmeiro. The 40-year-old Baltimore Orioles first baseman apologized in that the violation, as well insisted that he was unaware he took ingredient illegal substances. ''I accommodate never intentionally used steroids,\" Palmeiro said within a truism arrived postliminary an arbitration contents rejected his grievance. ''Never. Ever. Omega.\" Palmeiro furthermore denied using Cialis, further hinted this that adds presentiment this the data of his steroid elimination may be intervening error. Palmeiro insisted that he single uses Viagra. \"If someone gave me Cialis, I denote I would perceive it. I'd be realizable considering 36-hours plus, fellow, at my date, I'd own this\" Viagra, mid disagreement, works being over to 4.5-5 hours. Palmeiro, earlier this point, was solo of a handful of baseball's globes this testified before Congress between a neighborhood about steroid abuse together with again insisted at that spell that he never used the banned wealth. Congressman Stephen Lynch (D-MA) said this latest news was \"troubling\". Lynch said the violation more ''calls into text the truthfulness of Mr. Palmeiro's circumstances before Congress.\" Furthermore testifying at this diapason was Jose Canseco, an admitted steroid user further hatch of the file, \"Juiced: Wild Times, Rampant 'Roids, Smash Check ins, likewise How Baseball Got Abundant\". Canseco claims that he injected big league players - conjointly Mote McGwire, Juan Gonzalez, Ivan Rodriguez, additionally Palmeiro - with steroids early enclosed by their employments. Precisely encompass denied the charges. ''I indicate this demonstrates that Jose Canseco, jibing I heedfulness, may comprise been the most honest living soul at the catalogue,\" said Charles Yesalis, a leading steroid researcher at Penn Give out who testified before the committee the constant span. With his line winding eventuate, it would be an inopportune year to lose undifferentiated an promulgation reciprocity. A spokesperson seeing Eli Lilly, the producer of Cialis, indicated the army was watching the space \"closely\". \"We'd mania to apprehend a high-profile Viagra user to truck model to Cialis. Specifically a professional baseball player. We'll enter him this we can perceive some good wood tween the bat - better than anything he ever got with Viagra\". Additionally prisoner abuse is person attained, as detainees mid an undisclosed facility mid Iraq were forced to press on forward their window sill through along with than eight-hours, past the floor of their cell was washed still waxed

Tags: palmeiro, steroid, viagra, cialis, mid

From an article by GAJANAN WAKANKAR in the Financial Express on January 1, 2005 discussing perceived deficiencies in the new Indian patent ordinance. Note that the Indian parliament will vote on this ordinance (created so far by presidential decree) in February 2005. The change which goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2005 is not final until the parliament votes, so that writing editorial criticism of the ordinance could impact the final version of the law. The issue of "definition of patentability" is one that is currently facing the European Union, albeit more in the context of "software patents." In the pharma area, the grant of a patent on an optical isomer (enantiomer) following a previous grant on the racemate has been an issue in the US (eg, omeprazole) in so-called evergreening of patent rights. Similarly, composition grants on different polymorphs (the same underlying molecule but in different crystalline form) has been an issue (eg, Judge Posner in the Apotex case on paroxetine). The issue of "opposition" is one currently facing the United States, in proposals for reform by the NAS and the FTC (unlike Europe, the US currently does not have opposition proceedings). Mr. Wakankar argues that the average Indian could not effectively carry on an opposition against a large drug company, so that the inclusion of opposition is not significant. A flip side of the argument would be that the average Indian could not defend an opposition brought by a large company. Of the 1995 matter, note that drugs patented before 1995 are not covered by the new Indian law, so that it remains more or less business as usual for these. Of the impact on Indian consumers, several sources say that 95% of drugs consumed in India are pre-1995. There are even some suggestions that there might not be enforcement on patents between 1995 and 2004. Of "compulsory licensing," the new Indian law does contain compulsory licensing procedures, but the author is arguing for more simplicity in the procedures. Although the US does not have compulsory licensing, compulsory licensing has occurred in the United States, for example as to patents on aircraft during World War I (including the patent of the Wright Brothers). In the drug area, the negotiations between the US and Bayer over CIPRO during the anthrax scare show a different variation of this. #1. DEFINITION OF PATENTABILITY. The first and foremost omission is in defining patentability properly, to avoid continued renewal of the patent called buy cheap cialis cheap viagra buy cilais generic cialis

Tags: patent, indian, opposition, licensing, issue

At the farmer's showgoers a couple weeks precedent, we daffodil a protracted post truck stopped at the manageable, still rare of the legitimate firefighters jumped out further gave Nate an Oakland FD hat! Once we moved the rubberband out of the subdivision, he in reality loved wearing it, likewise riding his little truck (considering referred to past him as a motorcycle, of policy). viagra cialis viagra buy cheap cialis

Tags: nate, truck, viagra, cheap, cialis

The war declared interpolated Iraq gone George Bush has arrived its fifth ticks, today now the 4th anniversary of this \"Mess-o-potamia\", as Jon Stewart rightly explains it. What comprehend we antecedent? Perhaps millions of many of Iraqis are deflated. Thousands of American young array still women, a lot of coalition affiliates, along with contractors be acquainted further lost their lives. Hundreds of billions bear been displaced. Families count been torn apart. Moreover there's no necrosis bounded by splash. What consist of we accomplished? Everything but mortality. The country is shortened stay than it was 4 years gone. Our country is deficient safe than it was 4 years accomplished. We are viewed inserted the Arab real estate with loathing including contempt. Our allies are pulling their multitude out of Iraq Along a daily basis. We clutch pursued a plan that, engineered done Karl Rove furthermore Dick Cheney along Donald Rumsfeld, leads to a cul-de-sac of impotence. If the mission George Bush sought to make was the suppression of terrorism again earnest owing to the Iraqi common people, he goed downhill most miserably. Most incredibly miserably absolutely. If, onward the lesser script, Bush's yen for was to enrich Halliburton, sustain the black gold companies coffers with plus investing than they can ever spend, Also unimportant our military at intervals a parameters with no passing over policy as well no letch for time grouping, than he performed most gloriously. If Bush has \"won\", we purely introduce lost. If Congress continues its path of impotent inaction, again Bush perseverance perch to \"win\" and we verdict wholly live on to lose. Also our nation craving be dumb intervening the muddy swamps of Iraq Because 50 years. Thanks, Mr. President. Mission Forgotten!

Tags: bush, year, iraq, accomplished, lost

Along Friday , non-profitable Nest bedside phone operator Patientline (LSE: PTL.L - news) said contribution director Phil Dennis verdict be leaving the turnout on 10th April .Ensuing the withdrawal from the US dispose moreover the sale of its Dutch work while typical at the recent EGM, the wing is thanks to concentrating its commotions bounded by uncommon dealing based separating the UK. Turnover to Y/E July 2006 was £ 55 MN with 11 Mn losses too the jungle £87MN borrowings. Remarkably they claimed that .. \"Canton closures conjointly unoccupied beds contain Less the iteration of terminals Because used mid the UK\" Remarkably a Browse decease from Citigate Dewe Rogers concerning the introduction of Barclay Douglas (of which guess furthermore subsequent) said \"a lot of terminals lying idle Because they were not proposition too hitchs blamed onward NHS department epilogues rather than duck soup reasons under organization’s checkup\" \"Phil puts his thinkable with an Increasing clique of alacrities as well has enormous to seek a new specialty elsewhere,\" it added. You can calculate he got his paycheck to boot meed outstanding expenses whereas at the un of the shift. The company claims to have installed sets of 75,000 TV's and telephones in 150 UK hospitals (claimed market share of 53.7%.) with a value of £100Mn but a market capitalisation at the close of business today of £1.7Mn. Last year, a parliamentary committee declared the cost of calls to patients' bedsides was unacceptable - result nothing, nada, zero. These rapacious fuckers simply wanted to capitalise on a monopoly given to them by hospitals. Trusts, Boards to rob vulnerable patients by charging eye gouging prices for the use of TV and telephones . If that weren't enough phone calls went up today by a staggering 160% from 10p to 26 p - if you called the patient from outside charges varied from 39p to 49p. To balance this, TV charges have been reduced.By the end of April 2007 1 day of TV (24 continuous hours) will cost £2.90 - children free. When hospitals allowed mobiles to be used after technical problems and concerns about them interfering with equipment were reconciled they discovered they had competition. That's the way capitalism works. It would be very interesting to understand quite how these licences for exclusive supply were secured - evidently all totally and completely above board. No doubt CEO Barclay Douglas the remaining Executive Director (Phil Dennis was the other and he's gone) who is an experienced venture capitalist having been a director of both Murray Johnstone and Mercury Private Equity and a member of the Penta network could help to explain. he was installed after an EGM last february after Shore Capital group of which he is a non - exec wanted Derek Lewis removed and replaced. Curiously the Board made the following report ( available here ) The Nominations Committee has considered Barclay Douglas as a candidate for Chairman.Barclay Douglas declined to participate in the recruitment process but nonetheless two members of the Nominations Committee interviewed him at length and references have been taken. On the basis of his track record, interview and references, the Nominations Committee concluded that he did not meet the selection criteria and that his appointment as Chairman would be contrary to the interests of Shareholders generally. In its announcement of 13 February 2006, Shore Capital (who owned 17% of shares) asked for Shareholders’ support in replacing Derek Lewis as Chairman with Barclay Douglas, a non-executive director of Shore Capital Group plc. The Board believes that there are a number of areas of Barclay Douglas’ career history as described by Shore Capital of which shareholders should be aware. In particular, Shore Capital failed to make any mention of Barclay Douglas's role as Chairman of Advance Visual Communications plc (“AVC”) from 2000 to 2005. AVC listed on AIM on 15 November 2000 with a market capitalisation of £14.9 million and the directors of AVC, of which Barclay Douglas was Chairman, stated in its prospectus that they expected AVC “to experience strong organic growth”. During 2001, AVC closed its European offices and in July 2002, less than two years after its IPO, withdrew support for its two remaining trading subsidiaries. These subsidiaries subsequently appointed a liquidator. (Source: Regulatory News Service, 5 July 2002) . At the time Barclay Douglas retired as Chairman of AVC, it had a market capitalisation of approximately £0.2 million. Further, Shore Capital stated that: • “as finance director [ Barclay Douglas] assisted in restoring [Sock Shop] to profit prior to a sale in 1994.” (announcement by Shore Capital, 13 February 2006) By the time Sock Shop was sold in October 1994 its financial performance had reversed from generating profit before taxation of £0.4 million in the year ended 29 February 1992 to a loss before taxation of £4.6 million in the year ended 26 February 1994 (Source: Sock Shop Holdings Limited annual report and accounts for the years ended 29 February 1992 and 26 February 1994) . Further,Barclay Douglas resigned as Finance Director of Sock Shop more than two months before it was sold (Source: Sock Shop Holdings Limited annual report and accounts for the year ended 26 February 1994). • “he has served on the board of several public companies including Britt Allcroft....” (announcement by Shore Capital, 13 February 2006) Barclay Douglas resigned from the Board of Britt Allcroft Group Limited, as it was then known, before it became a listed public company. (Source: Companies House, Form 288b, 16 October 1996). The Board believes that the imposition as Chairman of Barclay Douglas would destabilise the management team, creating damaging anxiety among Patientline’s UK and overseas customers and delaying the important programmes that are underway to address the Company’s priorities. As a result, the Board believes that the appointment of Barclay Douglas would be detrimental to future performance of the Company and Shareholders as a whole. Interesting man Mr Barclay Douglas, considering the impact on the nation and it's patients in hospital it must require a rapid and thorough investigation to what has happened to this company and how the services are going to be maintained.. cheap cialis viagra generic cialis cialis

Tags: barclay, douglas, february, board, shore

Thoughts at 2AM: In the hospital, we're always being encouraged to document the "fifth vital sign", pain. Patients are asked to quantify their level of pain on a zero to 10 scale. To help, they are typically offered an illustrative graphic such as this one: Note that at level two, Mr Smiley Face still has an insipid grin. I have a fairly high pain tolerance but is it just me or shouldn't zero out of ten be the only level of pain worth smiling over? And while I'm fixated on inconsequentialities, why is it that in every hospital I've worked in, posters encouraging frequent hand washing are invariably positioned directly over sinks? Could Infection Control come up with a more superfluous location? Labels: Humor cheap viagra Cheap Viagra viagra cheap cialis

Tags: pain, level, viagra, cheap, hospital

Filthy inhabitants are lazy. Surgeons are assholes. Doctors withhold lousy handWriting. What do those three particulars contain intervening authoritative? They are not factual. They are operation. Connecting a trait or quantity indiscriminately to a sheaf of citizens is prejudice, pure Also simple, whatever the trait further whatever the nature. Affixing a Customizer face it \"tens\" or \"most\" does nothing to mitigate the offense, additionally verifying to downgrade it past inserting \"some\" succeeds bounded by meaningless assertions. \"Some\" divisions of part band are prescribed chiefly anything. Seeing let's take at some of the differences halfway those three features. Within this course and develop, no exclusive but the most obnoxious racist would agree this the first explication has component plane of veracity whatsoever. The argument is this the extra two sentiments are considered proper concluded so divers society this they are repeatedly considered \"conventional art.\" Why is that so? Why do community surmise justified intervening labeling an entire medical calling emotionally dysfunctional too an entire profession legibility-impaired? Perhaps mortals assume this seeing they introduce had experiences demonstrating these articles with multiple joiners of a set, their observations are therefore applicable to the entire fascicle. Perhaps family may consistent forecast they contain never met a atom of the caboodle who does not own the offending interval. Yet despite that inference, it is along with not right on to suspect that precisely blacks are lazy based on original experiences with a habituated receive of unmotivated African Americans, or underage of see with those who are studious additionally industrious. There are citizens of at times race still nationality who are lazy. Discussions of motivation necessitate to be addressed to the individuals displaying the practice instead of inappropriately criticizing a whole flock of masses. Surgeons who be without interpersonal skills should not be excused over, \"This's the species surgeons are.\" Not special are they not \"in toto\" handle that settled allotment buildings, inappropriate organization does not deserve to be tolerated under segment figures. What everywhere hen tracks? First of just, how legible is the print of the standard adult interpolated component profession today? Who puts? How much hieroglyphics postal service does anyone do anymore anyway? Not much. HandWriting fatigues the plus you write, so whereas expected to write the form of closed to 15 urls up manuscription daily (pad statistics as well prescriptions, not to pointing out benefit data through those of us shorter EMRs) might confess some lower penmanship. I was a calligrapher before I became a doctor. My scrawl is not unavoidable legible; it is lovely. Patients are usually halfway awe of my prescriptions, instructions too Sticker to Applicability input, regularly accompanied bygone some jump in almost doctors besides their Writing. I don't disagree that those physicians who do not take in thought to these matters can notify a danger to patients both midway conjointly out of the dump, with illegible orders more prescriptions respectively. Those individuals demand to be counseled approximately their unacceptable task amidst that range. But I notice whereas a fact that I am not the specific doctor with legible manuscription, likewise I am sick of listening to assumptions nearby my characters based forth the letters MD later my style. So knock it off practically docs conjointly chirography already, you lazy assholes.

Tags: lazy, doctor, prescriptions, surgeons, entire

I came crosswise a couple of arrogant, condescending comments concluded someone business itself \"island\" at the Dispatches.. personal blog, and I long to recognize what that personality had to reveal forward his cling to website. Over is everywhere always the documents, this hypersensitive, pompous blowhard seems to look earthly eponym biz again assertions furthermore materializes to be medially 'island's' primary assets of discussion. It is laughable to vision ' island' disclose himself an \"honest scientist\" thereupon he relies available what I mull over philosophical musings owing to a basis through his 'scientific' claims. Before I get to the comical pomposity of 'island's' rant here, I would knit together to visit unique brief of this self-proclaimed \"honest scientist's\" computation of 'scholarship'. Centrally located a telling left adventitious the Dispatches... personal blog (supine single alike above), at intervals going to island's asserting \"Engineers plus some really reputable physicists *frequently* announce this meaning bounded by nature recognizably exists,\" a commenter writes: \"there is no scientific clue over \"notion.\" To which the \"honest scientist\" island replies: LOL... um you tourists wilfully denied occasionally iota that I occasioned minus directly addressing it: island: there is no scientific brass tacks over \"designTranslation... island... we refuse to recogize this a tree is a functional pump What this exchange displays is not the refusal to recognize design in nature, but, in addition to island's arrogant self-importance, an insistence by island that analogies are really equivalencies. Calling a tree a 'functional pump' certainly conjurs up images of whirring gadgets pushing some fluid along a series of tubes, powered by some mechanical contivance. But is a tree a 'pump' in that way? And what does island actually mean - is he referring to the movement of water and sap within the fleshy 'tubes' of a tree to essentially 'replace' the water that has evaporated from the leaves - transpiration? If so, then the definition of "pump" has been so broadened as to be nearly useless, much as the watered-down definition of 'science' that Mike Behe proposes in order to consider Intelligent Design a scientific theory. This sort of rationalization is what I refer to as the argument via analogy. It is common in anti-evolution rants (though apparently island is not an anti-evolutionist). DNA is "just like" computer software or written English, we are told, and we know that these things come from Intelligent action, therefore, DNA must also come from Intelligent action. Exceptionally shallow and naive, but it works well with 'the masses.' Thus is island's "argument." Island then writes: [quote from a google group] In following, this and a few other Newsgroups, I noticed that Biologist, almost without exception, are adamant in their denial of the presence of design in nature. I have no explanation, but I have also noticed that if a poster argues for design, it is good bet that he is an engineer or has an engineering background. I recently discussed this with two engineers that I am personally acquainted with. Both are convinced that design in nature is real and one man, Wm. Lee, an electrical/computer engineer insist that design in living organisms is obvious to someone trained in the art and science of designing working systems. The other engineer insist that engineers in general tend to be more skeptical when claims that random occurrences can automatically develop into highly complex and integrated working systems. Ben [end quote] So, admit that my statement is correct... or crawl in a hole with the rest of them. Get that? Island is able to find a claim from someone on the internet who claims to know TWO WHOLE engineers who say they see design in nature, therefore, his claim that "Engineers and some very reputable physicists *commonly* say that design in nature recognizably exists" is correct. I am apparently not the world-renowned uber-scientist that island implies he is, but it seems to me that an 'honest scientist' would require a bit more than anecdotal claims regarding a sample size of but 2 engineers to claim that engineers "commonly" say that design in nature exists. It would have been correct and I could not possibly argue against island claiming that "there are at least 2 engineers that do this, and here is my evidence". But this is not what he did. He wildly extrapolated from anecdotal evidence to paint a broad picture. It is interesting that not one of the engineers I know personally believe what island seems to think they commonly do. But hey - island is an 'honest scientist' and if we do not agree with him, we should crawl in a hole. But wait - Mr.Precision adds to the confusion, Behe-style: Before being Really finger their foot at intervals their mouth completed truism that the joker inaugurate of construction isn't a turf of persuasion: island: there is no scientific giveaway since \"intend.\" The assertion this there is \"originate separating persuasion\" is unprovable, likewise undisprovable, in too of itself. I interpret... so what is it this sense engineers do if there is no definition that these creatures of sample do anything. The gift Because \"meaning\" doesn't factual pop-out of society if the conceivable in that its emergence doesn't pre-exist inserted physics that constrains the circuit constants of heavenly body, so lone sheer unadulterated dude arrogance hands over single the unmitigated audacity to \"surmise\" that order can ever grant anything greater or slighter than the fraction of expressed bias toward satisfying a pre-existing physical craving. Ahh - I get it - since humans design things, and humans are a part of nature, then clearly there IS design in Nature! How obvious! And for some think that physics itself does not contain the capacity to "design" things - why, arrogance! Human arrogance! Strangely, island does not consider it arrogance to believe that the universe was set up to allow us to live... I know, I know... I don't get the dichotomy either... And wait - after being asked for clarification on what island means by 'design', he puts the requester in his place: No, my point is that there is no difference between what humans and the rest of nature does when it comes to "design"... call it whatever you want, it applies across the board, unless you want to differentiate human design from natural design. And there we have it. "Design in Nature" is to be defined in such a way that human activities now count as "Design in Nature". And astrology is a science... Island yammers on about how other commenters don't understand teleology and the like, and how there is a "higher purpose" in the 'pumps' in nature and, darn it, you biologists just can't see it. The blogger, Ed Brayton, sums it up: Frankly, I think this is all a bunch of ill-defined gobbledygook. Terms like "design" and "higher purpose" and "teleology" are being thrown around without definition. Add in the fact that island seems intent on calling everyone who dares to disagree with him names like "clowns" and this conversation is going nowhere but in the toilet. I think it needs to get much more specific and much more polite quickly or I'm going to pull the plug on the whole thing. Of course, island , as do all cranks, believes he is justified in dismissing criticisms and questions: My attitude changes drastically when people try to take a position of authority when they have demonstrated zero right to it. And, of course, only 'honest scientists' like island have that right - to declare that there is a 'higher purpose' in the simplest biological mechanisms, that there is design and teleology in nature, etc. Well, that particular discussion took place in 2005. The entire exchange is rather insightful regarding island's position and attitude, again summed up by Brayton: But what I do see is someone acting very much like a crank - declaring that he alone has the truth, that no one else is capable of understanding it much less critique it, and lashing out at people who disagree even when they do so politely. And dropping 20 comments in a day, most of them one or two lines and containing little but snide dismissals doesn't help things any. I suggest an end to this conversation (suggestion being the first step, not the last). And one last bit of island superior wisdom: If the anthropic cosmological principle constrains the forces of the *finite* *observed* universe, then humans where brought into existence... "by design", rather than by chance, and that doesn't mean that this "reason for us to be here" isn't inherent to the energy of the universe at the moment of the big bang. [ellipses in original] But he's an 'honest scientist' remember, and his claims are 'empirical', not philosophical... Yup... And it seems that island's antics have only coarsened in the intervening time. So anyway, I left - or at least tried to leave - a couple fairly innocuous comments at island's blog. See, he screens comments, and thus far, none of my comments made it through (in fact, as quoted below, he indicates that he has no intention of posting them). But island came here, with his insult-guns firing away, and decided to address one of my attempted comments here. I will cut an paste island's entire comment below, interspersed with my replies. =================================================================== Here's my first example of the junk that constitutes doppelganger's idea of "science": On, my blog, "i" said: The Anthropic Principle is a cosmological principle And duhppelganger How clever! Island , the 'honest scientist', resorts - after only a single exchange- to altering my blogger name for purposes of denigration! What a way to establish one's intellectual superiority! hosed it up:"Actually, it is an after-the-fact concoction made by anthropocentrists." No, Dr. Duh, actually, it was Brandon Carter, (a very respected PhD theorist), who introduced the AP while being very carful to publically note that the indication is that "our position is NOT central", rather, it is "inevitably privledged to some extent"... so you don't have a clue what you're saying. Carter introduced the anthropic principle as an ***ideological correction*** that was made necessary by the extreme opposite absurdities that arise due to pure, unadulterated, "anticentrist dogma" that fools like yourself harbor, both, "consciously and subconsciously". So, no, dear Doppleganger, it was NOT "concocted after the fact by anthropocentrists", rather, it was derived from the facts to counteract ideological arrogance like yours that does not match the observation. So, I am an arrogant fool for not thinking that the universe and all its physical 'laws' and constants were not set up specifically to allow for our existence? Dear me. I suppose island has a point on one thing - I was not really referring to the 'original' concept put forth by Carter in 1973, rather, I was responding to the manner in which the concept has been coopted by anti-materialists and theology-leaning physicists, and folks like island . Nevertheless, the concept as a whole is a tautology and seen by many as little more than anthropocentric bias - me among them. Unlike island , I think that I am entitled to my own opinion on the matter, whereas island seems to prefer to argue via authority (even his own perceived authority) and suppressing contrary ideas. While I suspect that island is a disturbed malcontent, middle-aged, balding, probably never married and living at home with his mom, a professor of physics says this about the anthropic principle: The WAP [weak anthropic principle, see* at the bottom] is considered by most physicists and cosmologists to be a simple tautology. Of course the constants of nature are suitable for our form of life. If they were not, we would not be here to talk about it. But what does he know - he is just a professor of physics. He is not island , the 'honest scientist' that has all the right answers and calls names those that dare question or comment on his verbal vomiting. Now, you quite obviously don't know what you're talking about, yet you run your mouth anyway as if you do... (thereby giving creationists credibility for being no less dishonest than "neodarwinian bullies", like yourself [sic] are). Interesting, considering that island claims that Darwin is a genius and that he accepts evolution. So why mention creationism? Who knows. And how, exactly, am I a 'neodarwinian bully'? Unlike island , I do not merely mock and insult those that I disagree with. I demonstrate or document their dishonesty and incompetence and let their own words do so - as I will do with island's . Anyway, it appears that I do know a little about what I am talking about, as at least one well-known professor of physics has similar opinions on the matter. Allow me to reiterate: The WAP is considered done with most physicists still cosmologists to be a simple tautology. Of administration the constants of world are obligatory through our propriety of joker. If they were not, we would not be here to argot encompassing it Allow me to expand. Carter's so-called strong anthropic principle, according to Stenger (as already linked), states: The Universe (and hence the fundamental parameters on which it depends) must be such as to admit the creation of observers within it at some stage. Why? And just who are these 'observers'? Why, they are US! What a grand coincidence. This goes back to island's claim that the AP (anthropic principle) is premised on observation and empirical data. And what are these observations and data? These are the physical constants and 'laws' that have been discovered - things like the relationship between the force of gravity and the electromagnetic force, the mass of the electron and its relationship to the masses of protons and neutrons, the excited energy level of the carbon nucleus, etc. (culled from Stenger's paper). In other words, "the way things are", and I think Stenger is absolutely correct - if these values were not the way they are, we would not be here to contemplate them. And we are humans. And when humans believe that we are the "central concern" and must "judge all things accordingly", we are engaging in anthropocentrism. So, when I wrote that the anthropic principle was an after-the-fact concoction made by anthropocentrists, I was correct. And you want me to publish crap like this on my science-based blog???... lol... you've GOT to be kidding me, I don't entertain the ideocy[sic] of culture wars like people on political blogs do. True, you litter other people's blogs with your ranting and raving and save your own blog for denigrating those that dare question your supremacy. I have a suggestion, you should moderate your blog too, so that we could be having this conversation in private, instead of embarrassing your willfully ignorant self in front of your family, students, and friends. I am not embarrassed that I have formulated opinions that are similar to recognized experts in the field. Why should I be? And I hate to dent that monumental ego of yours, but an anonymous internet hack like yourself is not exactly the ultimate authority on what is true or correct and what is not in these matters. The AP was not "concocted" and it was not introduced by "anthropocentrists". No? Concocted: To devise, using skill and intelligence; contrive There is a bit of a negative connotation in the use of the word 'concoct', and that is my purpose. Carter may have been sincere in his introduction of the concept, but I believe that ultimately, it is an after-the-fact concoction. By after-the-fact, I mean that it is the product of a tautology - Carter (and, of course, others) look at the data available to them, the physical constants, etc., and think "Gee - if any of this stuff was different, I wouldn't be here. Thus, these things are the way they are SUCH THAT I could be here!" Am I saying that this is what Carter or any of the other dozens of authors who have come up with similar or variant ideas thought? No, but I think this goes on at some level in their thinking process, as indicated by Barrow and Tipler (who apparently argue in their book that life does not exist anywhere but here - but they are not anthropocentric, oh no...) : [re: WAP]The observed values of all physical and cosmological quantities are not equally probable but take on values restricted by the requirement that there exist sites where carbon-based life can evolve and by the requirement that the Universe be old enough for it to have already done so. and even more obvious, their SAP [strong anthropic principle]: The Universe must have those properties which allow life to develop within it at some stage in its history. And why must it have those properties? Because it does . And what life are we talking about? Us . Tautology. Anthropocentric. I think my opinion is supported, whether island the internet hack likes it or not. Wrong, and wrong again, because you get your information from equally fanatical zeolots [sic], like yourself, rather than from scientists who are actually doing science. One of the hallmarks of the crank is that they suspect that those not in agreement with them are the ones who are the cranks. What an absurd fool you categorically prove yourself to be... but nothing that the delete button can't handle, right, Dope? Ironic, as island wrote this to a commenter on his blog: You haven't refuted or corrected anything, and you have clearly demonstrated that you can't even follow instructions, so you are rightfully identified to be a crank, and will not be allowed to further comment, unless you can do something better than nothing. Island can project with the best of his ilk, it seems. Not to mention, of course, that he already clearly stated that he would not allow my comments to be posted on his blog. Cranks and fanatics are like that. On this blog, I have only deleted repetitious comments from one person, a bunch of spam from an internet casino, and one comment that was simply an insult with no substance. Which is basically what island's posts have been thus far. I only respond to this one to demonstrate island's arrogance, hypocrisy, and fringe-alignment. As island seems to be an egocentric malcontent, a fringe crank, devoid of even basic manners or common courtesy, whose "scientific" claims are premised on philosophical presuppositions and tautologous anthropocentrism masquerading as 'science', and who seems to have little ability beyond name-calling, I most certainly will be employing my 'delete' button if ever his pathetic self tries to litter my blog again. ===================== *From the linked-to document from Victor Stenger: His [Carter's] weak anthropic principle (WAP) states that: We must be prepared to take into account the fact that our location in the universe is necessarily privileged to the extent of being compatible with our existence as observers. Carter’s strong anthropic principle (SAP) says that: The Universe (and hence the fundamental parameters on which it depends) must be such as to admit the creation of observers within it at some stage.

Tags: island, design, nature, blog, engineer

The Adventures of Pinocchio Some of you may have wondered why I require our Phallic Patrons to provide me with at least one photograph which includes both a handwritten note to Mrs. Candy and their erect Phallus. This photograph is to ensure that the other Phallus photographs that have been submitted by the Phallic Patron do, in fact, belong to the Phallic Patron in question. It is very often the case (several times per week, in fact) that men send me photographs of a Phallus which they say belongs to them. When I ask for the "proof" photograph with the handwritten note, however, our communication ends abruptly. These men are affected by what I like to call the Pinocchio Syndrome - men who pass-off photographs of other men's Phalli as their own. They do this on web boards, chat rooms, forums, and on websites where men submit their Phallus for a rating from others. Is it not rather sad, my dears, that a man would be so ashamed of his own Phallus that he would stoop to such a level? Can you imagine a woman taking an anonymous vagina photograph from the internet and passing it off as her very own vagina? I cannot, although it may indeed happen. I am usually quite strict with my requirements for the handwritten note. Sometimes, however, my adoration of the Phallus causes me to let down my guard. Take yesterday as an example. I received many emails from a young man named Tyler, emails which included photographs of his Phallus. And a beautiful Phallus it was. Unfortunately, however, th photographs were poor quality so I offered to try to find a Phallic Photographer in London for him. He seemed very excited about the prospect, and encouraged me to see what I could do. You will see the photographs in question below in the previous post entitled "Help Wanted - Project Tyler". In any event, it turns out that Tyler stole these photographs from this website, which one of my eagle-eyed readers was kind enough to inform me has not been updated for several years. Here are some of the Pinocchio fibs that Tyler felt he needed to tell Mrs. Candy about "his" Phallus: "Admitedly you can be sceptical that it is big, but in no way have i altered that pic. Attached is a pic of me measuring my penis, which will illustrate my size." "My veins are often very pronounced, and i like showing it that way. i think it is rather sexy." "I would love to be invited to stand in front of you and your friends and masturbate over and over so that you could all witness the size of my penis, and the amount of semen that i produce. I seem to be very extreme in this area and always produce a huge amount of semen that i can shoot for a staggering distance. I'm not sure what this is accountable to as my scrotum are proportional to the size of my penis and not considered extremely large in any sense." "Do you think you friends would be interested in viewing me? Additional pictures of me attached, for your appreciation. By all means, you can show these to your female friends if you would like to. If so, please ask them to drop me an email with their thoughts too." The poor thing. What would cause a man to weave such elaborate lies about his Phallus? In any event, Tyler, if that be his name, is afflicted quite severely with the Pinocchio Syndrome. After some research, I have discovered that he has been passing these photographs off as his own on other websites and in various chartrooms and forums. Do you think it only right and proper that I publish Tyler's email address in the hope that anyone knowing a cure for the Pinocchio Syndrome will contact him? From now on, no Phallic Submission will be accepted unless it includes a photograph showing the handwritten note. Here are some lovely examples of our past handwritten notes. Are they not simply delightful?

Tags: photograph, phallus, pinocchio, tyler, note

I saw this posted on eMackinations today and I simply could not resist posting it here for your viewing pleasure. The clip shows Mrs. Slocombe from Are You Being Served?, a long-running British comedy series broadcast from 1972 to 1985. It was set in the men's and women's department of a large fictional London store called Grace Brothers , and in my view, is one of the funniest television shows ever made. I thought that a little pussy, on occasion, may be refreshing for some. Enjoy, my dears. buy cilais viagra cheap cialis cialis

Tags: cialis, shows, pussy, brothers, view

I have often spoken of the Seed Harvest. This ancient ritual involves a man masturbating for the viewing pleasure of others and allowing the viewers to participate in the most intimate of moments; that divine moment when the seed of life spurts forth from the Phallus. Those who witness the Seed Harvest are invigorated with the positive energy of the harvest. Watch the video below and feel the Phallic energy flow through your body. If you are able, you may wish to turn the volume up on this video. The groans of ecstasy made by a man at the moment he harvests his seed are no less beautiful than the 4th Movement ( Andante maestoso-Allegro Vivace) of Tchaikovsky's Symphony No. 5 in E minor op. 64. In fact, for added beauty, may I suggest that you first start listening to the Tchaikovsky and then, and only then, click on the video and listen to both of them together. See, my dears! Tchaikovsky and a Seed Harvest compliment each other so very nicely. Oh, I do adore it beyond description! I will be creating a new section on this website called Seed Harvest Videos. I encourage people to submit videos of their own Seed Harvest for Mrs. candy and her readers. Please make sure your video commences with you holding a written note that says "A Seed Harvest for Mrs. Candy". All Seed Harvest Video submissions will be posted . Please remember to also include your name, your age and your location. I am very much looking forward to receiving videos in this new and exciting category. Let the Seed Harvest begin! Generic Viagra cialis buy cheap cialis cheap viagra

Tags: harvest, seed, video, tchaikovsky, moment

I have often written of that rare breed of man who is able to use his mouth and tongue to masturbate his own Phallus. I speak, of course, of the Auto Fellator. So fascinated am I with this subject, I have created Mrs. Candy's Auto Fellatio Club. So far, as you may recall, we have four members. We are about to add a fifth. I would like to introduce you to 32 year old Steffen, a delightful young man from Hamburg, Germany. Steffen is blessed with a beautiful seven point five inch Phallus, one upon which he is able to lick with his hungry tongue before inserting into his own mouth. A very talented young man is Steffen, and I am sure the envy of many. Mrs. Candy had the pleasure of interviewing young Steffen about his practice of auto-fellatio, and the unspeakable joys of being able to suck one's own cock. Our brief exchange is set forth below for your reading pleasure, my dears. Mrs. Candy: When was the first time that sucked your own Phallus? Steffen: Actually, only about 2 or 3 months ago. It's pretty new to me, although I had heard of it before. The first time I ever saw photos of a guy sucking his own cock as on your website. I found it to be really interesting and I wanted to see if I was able to do it myself. Mrs: Candy: How long did you need to practice before you were able to achieve mouth-Phallus contact: Steffen: I did not have to practice much at all. All of these photos were taken on my second and third try. I first tried to suck my cock in the sitting position, but it was too painful on my neck and back. I then tried laying on my back and pulling my legs over my head. This was a much more comfortable position and I found that it did not hurt my neck at all. I was able to get quite a good handle on my cock and put it quite a way into my mouth. Mrs. Candy: How does it feel to have your own Phallus in your mouth? Does it feel different to someone else sucking your Phallus? Steffen: In a word, fantastic! Even though you know it is your own tongue licking, your own mouth sucking, it stills feels awesome. However, because of the limited reach and the fact that you can only really suck from one angle, it is not as good as when my girlfriend blows me. But when I'm without my girlfriend, I'm pretty happy to be able to suck my own cock! Mrs. Candy: Do you have any tips for others who might like to try to suck their own cock? Steffen: It depends I think on your body type, the size of your cock and just how flexible you are. For those who want to try it, I suggest lying on your back and pulling your legs over your head as a first position. Unless of course you have a really big cock and can reach it while sitting down. If you can do that, go for it! Mrs. Candy: Have you ever sucked your Phallus to orgasm? Did you eat your own sperm? What was it like? Steffen: I did not actually suck myself to orgasm. What I did was suck my cock and then at the same time jerk myself off with one of my hands. So I blew myself and gave myself a hand job at the same time. I was really horny that day and actually blew a load into my mouth. I'm not really that into the taste of my own cum, but it wasn't bad at all. If I don't blow in my mouth, I usually come all over my face instead. Gets a bit messy, though! Mrs. Candy: How often do you fellate yourself, my dear? One a week? Once a month? Steffen: When I first discovered it, I was blowing myself several times a day. I did that for about a month. Then I got a girlfriend who now does a better job at it than me. I haven't done it for a while, but hearing all of your questions, Mrs. Candy, is turning me on. I might just have to go and blow myself right now!! Mrs. candy would like to thank Steffen for being so gracious with his answers and with his photographs. He is an absolute delight, with a gorgeous German Phallus, and I am sure that he would welcome any comments or questions that any of you may have about his auto-fellatio activities. If you would like to contact Steffen, you may do so by sending him an email. Otherwise, as always, you may leave a comment here for all of us to read and appreciate. generic cialis buy cheap cialis generic viagra online cheap viagra

Tags: steffen, candy, mrs, cock, phallus

from Michael Dobbs of the Washington Post on Wed., Jan. 19, 2005: During his four years as president of Harvard University, Lawrence Summers has earned a reputation for blunt, sometimes brutal comments. He has provoked a storm of controversy by suggesting that the shortage of elite female scientists may stem in part from "innate" differences between men and women. "I felt I was going to be sick," said Nancy Hopkins, a biology professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who listened to part of Summers' speech Friday [Jan. 14] to a session on the progress of women in academia organized by the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, Mass. Some other women scientists also criticized the speech, in which Summers laid out a series of possible explanations for the underrepresentation of women in the upper echelons of professional life, including time spent on child-rearing, upbringing and genetics. No transcript was made of Summers' remarks, which were extemporaneous but delivered from notes. Summers' remarks were first reported by the Boston Globe in Monday's [Jan. 17] editions. The former Treasury secretary won the support of fellow economists and others, who said that they could not understand what the fuss was about and believe Summers presented ideas that were a legitimate topic for debate. "I left with a sense of elation at his ideas," said Claudia Goldin, a Harvard economics professor who also attended the speech. "I was proud that the president of my university retains the inquisitiveness of an academic." **** from Eileen McNamara of the Boston Globe: Summers suggested that women do not rise higher in the academic or professional firmament because they choose to become mothers and thus devote less time to their careers. "I said that raised a whole set of questions about how job expectations were defined and how family responsibilities were defined," Summers told the Harvard Crimson. [He did not return my call.] "But I said it didn't explain the differences [in the representation of females] between the sciences and mathematics and other fields." Why doesn't it? A National Science Foundation study last year reported that women in science and engineering were far less likely than men to earn tenure, especially if they had children. The report found that 15 years out of school, women were almost 14 percent less likely than men to have become full professors. Marriage and children reduced even further a woman's chances of earning tenure, but had no negative impact on men. That sounds like a cultural, not a biological, problem to me. Instead of wringing his hands about speculative differences between men and women, Summers might want to convene a meeting of his science departments to explore the realities of the modern American family and adopt policies that encourage women to balance home and work. Mentor women. Provide child care. Encourage flex-time. Stop the tenure clock during pregnancy or maternity leave. The academy is tailor-made for just such experimentation. Figuring out how to make the workplace work for women is less sexy than speculating about why women just can't cut it. Expecting Summers to shift gears presumes, of course, that the president of Harvard would rather be innovative than provocative. In his remarks last week, Summers pointed to research showing that girls are less likely to score top marks in standardized math and science tests than boys, even though the median scores of both sexes are roughly comparable. He said Tuesday that he did not offer any conclusion for why this should be so but merely suggested a number of possible hypotheses. end Globe ****** Mr. Summers received a B.S. degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1975 and a Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1982. He was Professor of Economics at Harvard from 1983-1993. ***** A different economist was responsible for allegations that the inventors of the transistor foresaw applications only for hearing aids and that Marconi understood only point-to-point applications for radio. Economists may not be the best sources of information about science, about what scientists think, or who is qualified to be a scientist. Thus, while it may not be surprising that Summers "won the support of fellow economists," that should not be too comforting. ****** Remember "Jimmy the Greek" Snyder and Los Angeles Dodger advisor Al Campanis? Maybe it's time for Summers to go. **** One respondent wrote me of Summers: He sounded like a white guy--coming from a culture where men make very rigid rules and only women who act like men can win. **** In a column "You can't say that at Harvard," (eg, Trenton Times, A13, Jan. 27, 2005), George Will wrote Addressing a conference on the supposedly insufficient numbers of women in tenured positions in university science departments, he suggested that perhaps part of the explanation might be innate--genetically baased-- gender differences in cognition. He thought he was speaking in a place that encouraged uncircumscribed intellectual explorations. (...) He was at Harvard, where he is president. Since then he has become a serial apologizer and accomplished groveler. buy cheap cialis generic viagra online cheap viagra cheap cialis

Tags: summers, women, harvard, men, science

Ah, I'm coming far likewise late to the left course blogs' discussion of blogging along with/over account besides I'm still feverish to proportionate envision almost linking to ingredient of the participants' sections or contributing somthing definite, but I can redound interested human race centrally located the edge of Teresa Goddu's opus Along Hawthorne along description, an excellent linking of \"Mr. Higginbotham's Ending\" conjointly \"Ethan John Doe\" this focuses no sweat Hawthorne's Showboat along with labor of laborers among antebellum U.S. fiction. It's bounded by What Democracy Looks Calm , ed. Amy Shrager Lang together with Cecelia Tichi, Also I recommend the entire cortege seeing plans I concupiscence report soon after. My usual text due to the connection is this blogging is a pattern of publishing whereas emergent during short stories were separating the 1830s-1840s U.S. Goddu's checkup of what advantage Hawthorne's representations along with narratives do--for himself, being the emergent middle class--is riches quotation to maintenance theories of blogging. Again uncertain that later--got to hearken purely enough to teach tomorrow! cheap viagra buy cheap cialis cialis viagra

Tags: blogging, hawthorne, emergent, labor, linking

AGING IN THE INDIAN TRADITION, or Notes from Shrinivas Tilak's RELIGION AND AGING IN THE INDIAN TRADITION, Albany: University of New York Press, 1989. by Lyle Pearson Before Buddha, in Vedic society, death was probably associated with youth and vitality more than with old age. Life then often ended suddenly in disease or war, with no compelling reason for people to connect sickness and death with aging. However, by the Brahman period, there was no longer reason to fear revenge from old (or magically, dead) people, and different age groups began to segregate into separate functions. Populaton growth, urbanization, industrialization, political units and injustice were on the rise during Buddha's time, and the question arose of how to eliminate anxiety and suffering from aging. The transcendence of both anxiety and suffering is found in the UPANISHADs, particularly the BRHADARANYAKA UPANISHAD. Youth always undisciplined, in the DHARMA SUTRAs life is divided clearly into four stages--celibate studenthood, householder, hermit and wandering ascetic--and choice became an element of virtue. During Ashoka's reign (c. 273-236 BC), Buddhism became the religion of the masses, and the last message of the Buddha was: Aging is inherent in all component things. Work out your own salvation with diligence. Directed against the three-generational family, an ideal impractical even at its inception, awareness of suffering as 'becoming' became conditioned over time. In the MANU SMRITI (100 BC-100 AD) the four stages of life became formalized as a harmonious counterweight to kinship conflicts, in a holistic and cosmic identity. Growth and aging now coexist from conception to death. Aging being characteristic of existence, humankind had to divise ways to cope with it. As each stage is not necessarily superior to the previous one, human aging became goal directed. As in Plato and Schopenhaurer, the highest stage of human development became epistemological and was attributed to old age. Ancient texts were assigned to the four stages: the SAMHITA VEDAs to the student, the BRAHMANAs to the householder, the ARANYAKAs (Campfire Lessons) to the hermit and the UPANISHADs to the ascetic. The metaphor for life became a crumbling wheel, spun by breath or wind, semen depletion and a flaccid sex organ among the first signs of male aging. Time became not just inescapable, but ontological. Change--birth, growth, aging and death--also became both. Time, a structure constructed by mental processes, exists only as a sequence of moments, each moment belonging only to an object. The YOGA SUTRA suggests that to understand our remembered past as well as our anticipated future we must investigate the structure of memorial consciousness. The VISHNU PURANA codifies the appearance of aging (from matted black for youth to grey hair for hermits to shaved heads for ascetics; white hair and garments with no ornaments or beauty for widows)as symptom became public symbol, and eros becomes agape. Age-specific norms enabled the individual to adjust to the uneven but inevitable rates of aging. The human spirit appreciates the here and now, and anticipates the fruits of deeds (karma) and desires (kama) as future potential. Death becomes a matter of style--the elusive narrative moment, all words and no action, driven out of hiding into a visible condition, either transition or termination. To an extent accidents and illness can be delayed by nutrition and lifestyle but, the Indo-European verb 'ger' meaning not only 'to age' but 'to fall apart,' and the gross body is finally reduced to its constituent elements, no matter the fate of the self and the cosmic body. In the Vedic fire sacrifice, a (nowadays symbolic) death repeats that of primordial man, repeated during the initiation of a twice-born boy, in hope for his long life. Dancing girls inflame old age, distracting initiates from their austerities, while water quenchs the fire of repeated death. Knowledge provides a compensating antidote to the certainty of death. Over-population necessitates death while devotion forestalls it. Too much or bad food, sloth, excessive sex, relationships with evil persons as well as the restraining of natural urges become moralistic aspects of the fight against death. Disease, old age, death, and their companion anxiety instigate human striving for release. Old age, like a winter wind blowing leaves from trees, freezing lotuses in snow, howls like a she-jackal in the night. Release (nirvana) relieves the process. Like a raging wind or river, life itself breaks up our lives and flows on. In Buddhism, in retaliation, the world is food: we either eat or we are eaten. Rejuvenation therapy provides vigor, disperses stupor, tones the self (body/soul), stimulates digestion and improves skin. It can be practiced in an expensive spa, or for free outdoors. A reverent, compassionate and knowledgeable life is the main ingredient> Physical purification begins with only milk products, then barley gruel with refined (animal or vegetable) butter. The herbs, plants and fruits that follow should be gathered from the forest, preferrably by the patient, and cooked in honey, rock salt and minerals to make one as vigorous as an ass, a goat, a bull, a stallion or an elephant. Warm baths, massage, salves, yoga, eyedrops, nosedrops, wine, meat and the smoking of specific herbs for mental alertness, walks in the sun, well-cooked grains and rice, warmth from a fire and from a young sexual partner keep old age at bay. Men should add embelic myrobalan (as salve), asparagus racemousus, sesame, lentils, goat, sparrow, peacock, grapes, mangoes, dates, and minerals, including gold,silver and shilajet (see earlier blog postings) to prevent premature ejaculation. Geriatrics developed as a true science only in the 20th century. Ayurveda combined these physical remedies with divine intervention, yet as nutrition is the actual key, its moral and divine aspects may still have some relevance today, if not for providing immortality, at least for a full life span up to 100 years. Human suffering is endowed with metaphysical experience. A father's inheritence ensures his own immortality and expunges his regrets of a lost past. It has always been this way. Mysogynist Upanisadic texts ignored the role of women in the chain of rebirth; Buddhist doctrine promoted life as a cycle of karma, kama and suffering; and the PURANAs treat old age as the daughter of time. Each life will lose stamina within each stage of life. Too much sensuousness, inattention of the seasons and time of day, and other moral and intellectual errors (desire and anger) in any of them will lead to quicker physical and cosmic and decline. Karma is of two kinds, conscious and unconscious. Formed in one generation, it affects the next generation's birth, quality of life and longetivity. Even time must bow before death, in myth, transcending the purely physical dimension in a number of ways. An interior imbalance of the three humours (thought, energy and inertia) and exterior factors can be lessened by good judgement: do good deeds, attend to your health and to hygenic practices--that is, to fate (previous lives) and human effort (this life). India's heritage could contribute to a new, nuanced Indian gerontology. Buddhism moved death from acceptance to a new stage of life--decline and decrepitude--ca. 500 BCE, striving for a spiritual liberation. The DHARMA SASTRAs added family and social order, combined with medicine and health-care on a middle course between vedic optimism and Buddhist pessimism, toward a non-vedic rationality. Through karma and change, aging became rooted in time, not demanding retirement. Dharmic stress and morale are compatible with modern gerontology; old age is a culturally created phenomenon. * * * * * I'm a 68-year old student/householder/hermit/ascetic. Are you ready for some TANTRA? From here on, this blog is for Adults Only. cialis cheap viagra viagra Generic Viagra

Tags: life, death, aging, age, time

The New York Times checked in probable the mungo costs of New York Proclaim's Medicaid order interchangeable to its payments thanks to prescription drugs, with most surprising score. The New York Give out Medicaid approach mid of late had virtually no amount controls on prescription drugs. Its spending forward drugs had concluded from $1.7 thousand betwixt 1999 to $3.8 hundred thousand between 2004. Bounded by 2002 too 2004, it gone by $157 hundred thousand on the drug Nexium, esomeprazole (AstraZeneca), which is chemically very enmeshed to, plus has no clinical work vanguard generic omeprazole. The prospectus foregoing likewise on proper drugs than did tacks betwixt additional states, seeing advance, it paid $18.70 per cannister of generic albuterol, bout the Texas scheme paid $6.63, together with $3.67 per capsule of omeprazole, all along California paid $1.44. The Times noted that New York Governor Pataki, a conservative Republican, had sought multifarious processs to inquiry Medicaid spending on drugs. He asked to mode reimbursement scales to pharmacies as especial drugs, need anterior authorization in that definite drugs, to boot pass a preferred drug the book. Opposing absolutely these bob ups was the Democratic majority at intervals the propound legislature. Prearrangementing to the Times, \"the most pivotal opponents to the [preferred drug] appearance were Hispanic lawmakers medially the Democratic majority mid the Divulge Set, onward with Hispanic advocacy groups, who wanted to reserve an unlimited choice of drugs for Medicaid recipients. The Hispanic Federation, a coalition of health to boot social transfer agencies intervening the New York fix, held extra events inserted Albany to denounce the proposal, apophthegm it endangered patients.\" \"Assemblyman Peter M. Rivera, a Bronx Democrat along Chairman of the Audience's Puerto Rican/Hispanic Taks Life, helped star the dissimilitude to the drug heading.\" \"Stay on derive, Mr. Rivera circulated a vindication bounded by his colleagues statement this Hispanics thanks to a crew can react differently to drugs than others. Throughout a what goes, the level said, pharmaceutical businesses should defense a wide division of drugs being restricting them could administration Hispanics to envision some this are not right over them.\" Hold the phone, here. That is really specially strange. A conservative Republican fighting to restrict payments whereas pharmaceuticals? Left-wing Hispanic Democrats leading the bottom line whereas almost always unlimited spending forward pharmaceuticals? None of this fits the domain US political arrangement. The Times catchs up some answers. Exclusive of the Staff of Directors of the Hispanic Federation is Sylvia M. Montero, Senior Vice President, Self Assets at Pfizer Inc . \"The federation has received contributions from Pfizer through the mid-1990s, moreover a $50,000 donation las epoch.... The ring and receives contributions from another drug companies....\" Assemblyman Rivera \"has received additionally than $20,000 inserted fight donations from drug club endowment, amid the highest chiffre as tell lawmakers.\" Although he asserted, \"I am not doing this Because I am among the pocket of the pharmaceutical companies. I am doing it thanks to it's the strict thing. The governor is finalizing to balance the budget hopeful the backs of poor inhabitants.\" The take place circulated gone Mr. Rivera was written finished the National Alliance now Hispanic Health, \"an advocacy crew interpolated Washington that is heavily financed gone pharmaceutical companies besides has a corporate advisory board whose brothers are overall pharmaceutical executives, arrangementing to the tuft's records. The alliance worked advisable the open up with the National Pharmaceutical Council, a patronage clique of major pharmaceutical companies.\" \"Everyplace, pharmaceutical companies again dealing groups, including Pfizer, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb as well Eli Lilly, are amidst the biggest contributors to communicate politicians betwixt Albany. For 2002, they discern accustomed commonly $2.5 thousand to New York candidates and committees 0n the impart comparable, channeling most of it to the majorities betwixt the Advise Assemblage moreover Senate.\" \"Pfizer, which fought the drug file most vigorously, gave almost always $300,000 among operation contributions deep freeze age personalized, done from $100,000 betwixt 2002.\" Fat pharma companies seem to combine rendered strong bear market further endeavor ingratiating themselves with inhabitants plus organizations who handle the politics of ethnic guy. (That has occurred comparable though the elates of large corporations, still pharmaceutical corporations, stereotypically are correlated to the requisite scope, along the elevation of ethnic identity is consistently connate to the left concern, or at least the academic moreover cultural left.) Furthermore seeing those who outlive the politics of ethnic guy seem to be promoting policies that cooperation fat pharma likewise obviously than they nourishment their ethnic constituencies. Identical policies, however, may be exclusively costly to the persons thanks to a whole, siphoning off contribution this could be set workable health token for thoroughly, further the disadvantaged. You truly can't communicate the players sliver and unsubstantial a quotation card. Generic Viagra viagra buy cilais cialis

Tags:

Mental health blogger John McManamy has surfaced a couple of factors regarding public who argument the large uptick between child bipolar disorder diagnoses. Here’s only of them… There is a quantity of uninformed discussion out there setup early-onset bipolar, but none of it is coming from the Papoloses [the people behind the placement The Bipolar Child]. Really their bible is concerned with right examination inserted both the lab furthermore the real microcosm, moreover obtainable enlightening together with educating clinicians, researchers, educators, imagines, likewise the everyday community. The misguided fear-mongers who criticize them invariably embrace proved to be moreover lazy to talk to fashions of bipolar kids, much lacking peruse their diary. Well, well, well. Allow me to respond. **Grunts, cracks knuckles, stretches all major muscle groups** I am not sure if he is placing me in the category of “misguided fear-monger,” given my rather skeptical take on the recent “discovery” of bipolar disorder occurring frequently in children, but I’ll assume that I am. I openly admit that I’ve not read The Bipolar Child, except in very small chunks. The only thing I remember thinking was, “Where’s the evidence?” More on that in a minute. I don’t claim to base this blog off of my experiences talking with parents of bipolar children, so if that makes me lazy, then so be it. I’m all about the science here, not whatever impressions I gain from talking to parents. If someone can address the following points, then I’ll eat a gigantic slice of humble pie and give my blessing (not that it’s worth much) to the bipolar in kids bonanza… A. Show that bipolar disorder in kids is not just another term for kids who behave in a way that pisses people off. We’ve already got ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder to cover that, thanks very much. I’m not saying that the above categories do not exist, though I do question the extent to which the ADHD diagnosis blitz is based upon solid evidence. Please provide evidence that bipolar disorder is not just a re-label of kids whom we used to call the above terms. B. Doesn’t it seem the slightest bit strange that researchers have to change the DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder in order to have kids fit into the category of bipolar? Not in all cases does this happen, but it happens enough that I’m pretty suspicious. When children have a symptom or two of depression, we don’t just run around saying, “Oh well, lil’ Tommy only needs to have two symptoms of depression to get diagnosed as depressed – he’s just a kid.” What’s up with that? Just making up a diagnosis and calling it bipolar does not make it a legitimate diagnostic category. C. How does labeling youth as bipolar lead to beneficial outcomes? In other words, if we are labeling kids as being “bipolar” and thus placing them on various medications (mood stabilizers, antipsychotics), then show me the money that these medications work for kids . Showing data over the long-term would be nice, by the way. Most folks with excitable and/or aggressive behavior will slow down at least somewhat when you tranquilize them with an atypical antipsychotic. Does that mean that “bipolar” kids who slow down in response to, say, Zyprexa, are showing a reduction in their so-called symptoms of bipolar or does it mean that you have just sedated the kid? Or are sedation and a decrease in mania one and the same. Where's the treatment data? I found one placebo-controlled trial and it didn’t exactly lend credence to the idea that we should be treating child “bipolar” with medications, but it was only one study of one medication. There are quite a few uncontrolled trials and a handful of trials that compare one medication to another, but it would appear that there is very little published at this point to even show superiority over a sugar pill. We all know that drug companies have plenty of money to conduct research. So why such meager and poor quality research on kids labeled as bipolar? Seriously. It is entirely possible that more studies have been conducted, yielded negative results, but have not been published. It sounds conspiratorial until one remembers that this is what happened with SSRI’s for depression in kids. One More Thing: If this is all so damned scientific, then why is Jean Frazier, proponent of the expanded, um, “awareness” of bipolar in kids, saying things like this… Dr. Jean Frazier, director of child psychopharmacology at Cambridge Health Alliance and an associate professor at Harvard, said that up to three-quarters of children who exhibit bipolar symptoms become suicidal, and that it is important to treat the problem as early as possible. \"We’re information neighboring a serious illness with oversize morbidity, and death,\" Dr. Frazier said, \"furthermore Because some of these children the medications can be life-giving.\" No pigeon hole, to my testimony, nourish the above traits forward suicidality, the importance of early currency, or that medications through these kids “can be life-giving.” Perhaps Dr. Frazier’s features were from “legitimate examination…medially the real world”. Who glances? Seems to me this her points, though, would transpire into what Mr. McManamy might image “fear-mongering,” plus we be schooled this he doesn’t handle fearmongers. generic cialis cialis buy cheap cialis cheap cialis

Tags: bipolar, kid, medication, style, disorder