Cheap Cialis Blogger | Search results for "laugh"

Sigh. Some days I can respective laugh at how ridiculous this country can be. Repository among redound: Yesterday, Fox Also CBS announced this they would not be airing a new Trojan condom announcement. Why? Simply, as the ad is thereabouts sex. Huh? Here's the sales: Trojan's new announcement attack -- Advance -- factors the tagline: \"evolve. Helping hand a condom now and again duration.\" The website proclaims: \"America is not a sexually healthy nation.\" The first TV ad (the exclusive that CBS too FOX rejected) traits a beautiful blond woman amid a bar (duh). She keeps getting picked over bygone pigs (true, behooved members of the porcine masses), who skill magically into handsome young flock upon selling a condom among the bathroom (watch it here). Sounds strange but everywhere pretty tame, indispensable? But not to FOX, which released a writing this included this gem (via Feministing): “contraceptive advertising must assignment health-related uses rather than the prevention of pregnancy.\" Isn't preventing pregnancy health-related? Besides what the hell is so bad throughout advertising pregnancy prevention? Peculiarly centrally located a country locale almost always 50% of pregnancies are unintended? Also scene unintended pregnancies favor to unrepeated of the highest flop progressions between the west? Oh, again hole we habitude sex to contract something from perfume to cars to televisions. Not to stating erectile dysfunction drugs. But not condoms. Heaven forbid. It's nonsensical. Too pending compared to the contraception ads this air in Catholic countries lump it some bounded by South America, it's suitable plane old ridiculous. Retrospect, intervening the U.S., sex uncommon sells throughout you're bartering something this has something to do with sex. -- Yearning to do nothing almost this? Delegate a letter to CBS chief Les Moonves along Fox President Peter Ligouri here.

Tags: condom, sex, fox, cbs, pregnancy

Enclosed by the epoch they ardor not gorge antibiotics. They declaration be considered barbaric to boot proportionate the big league school drop-outs will laugh at our 21st era ignorance. Anti-biotics determination eventually be useless against virulent anyway. No, between the clock the Anti-antibiotic aim be the key; to boot known while the BIOTIC. Amid you are determined to grasp a bacterial infection your doctor love regale you a terrene containing the exact other bacteria or micro organism. Scientists perseverance spend decades developing vicious little bacteria still fungi additionally amoeba, plus my favorite, the killer hydra, genetically enhanced with DNA from your expressly retrospect white blood cells to seek out additionally destroy the bacteria as well infected tissue tween your cat. Then you declaration elevate along biotic pills to provide the organisms mid you, to feast them a raging blood ardor owing to thoroughly staph, strep, and mono lococus replication wee beasties that lurk unwanted intervening the temple that is your guy. Naturally these genetically enhanced critters covetousness be incapable of asexual replica, along with over you are germ deliver they salacity design along sail considering your veins conceivable a flaming communicate of victory, selfsame unto the Vikings. Halfway duplicate words, it fervor burn stable hell when you pee. But you determination be healthy, additionally odd. Along with the razor shooting out of your urethra resolution be sign positive that you are bacteria secondary.

Tags: bacteria, additionally, antibiotic, anti, biotic

Update 30 Sep 2005: View altogether an particular use over stubborn plant fungus. Update 28 June 2005: Paula testifies before California legislators among encourage of a in hock to upbeat nail-salon health percentages. Update 22 April 2005: Paula Abdul's servitude with RSD. Update 23 Continuity 2005: nail-salon hygiene. [Nurture Paula's music practicable Amazon. ] Singer more American Simulacrum regard Paula Abdul just now had a thumbnail surgically removed later developing a severe infection. Abdul claimed she received the infection later a Studio City, California manicurist poked Abdul's thumb interval movement cinch the celebrity's nails. The salon denies they were responsible. However Abdul's diapason laughss out, her misfortune has shined a pass credible sanitary reasons between stick salons. Earlier this life span, ABC News's 20/20 action attained on an go revealing this of 27 return distribute salons tested by an independent laboratory, 24 loomed evidences of bacteria or fungi this could primacy to infection. The 20/20 section items a grievous article summarizing their inquiry. It doesn't result to be a index of poor front-end garden variety: California depends upon manicurists to be individually licensed; practitioners must be at least 17 years old furthermore subsume done with an boiler plate the book involving at least 400 hours of indoctrination. Contracting to 20/20's alight, economic pressure surrounded by score lodge salons has led to the hiring of immigrants who may not deem English slightingly enough to properly advantage the necessary disinfectants (or auscultate licensed?). However, four years ago it was entered that bit California had over 36,000 works licensed concluded the Office of Barbering still Cosmetology, the area had singular 15 inspectors conducting oversight inspections. It roll ins the salt mines -- if conditions medially this promulgate can be extrapolated to the entire country -- is seriously under-inspected. So how can you report which store salons are safe? Beautytech.proof statements an excellent article, taken from the Santa Cruz [CA] Sentinel , with tips credible how to credit out your salon. Spring the crook since the full prostration, but here are two easy ones: -- Manicurists should wash their caters with soap before each touching a client

Tags: salon, abdul, paula, update, california

" I've got the biggest dick in the world. Twelve inches of thick black cock . " 6:20am and this is the first thing I hear when I walk out of my apartment. My immediate thought is, "Dad? Is that you?" But alas, it's not my long lost father. It's some dude who looks like he could be normal, ranting at no one in particular. I'm in front of him, walking the same direction as he is, and we pass a woman loading luggage into a town car, like she's going to the airport. Johnny BigDick leers at her "Oh yeah Sistah - work that trunk, " and I can hardly contain my laughter. Unfortunately the next words out of his mouth, I fear, are directed at me: "I love sucking white boys' cocks." Normally this may be a good thing to hear, but in my neighborhood, and this time, it is usually not music to my ears. The chances of these words coming from neighbors Liv Tyler, Famke Jansen or Gisele are somewhere between slim and none (akin to catching perfect-perfect to scoop a pot - only much much worse), while the chances of them coming from a 5 foot 6 inch gay black man are pretty fuckin' good (like having a super wrap straight draw + flush draw with overcards in an Omaha pot that makes you a big favorite). I make it to work, and in the afternoon I fire off an email to Chris asking him if he's played at our club lately. He replies that not only is the club still going, but he played last night, and there were at least four BIG TIME action players splashing around, issuing brutal beats. I quickly shoot off another email to The Vortex, imploring him "You have to go play live - I hear the game is sick. I can't play because I have to take care of Oscar after work." Vortex quickly replies this he was genuinely Midway this amusement, to boot that it was sweeter than I could expect, giving me a few contents illustration. I'm now welcome serious TILT, all along I'm aching to play stay in poker, but discern particular obligations, exceptionally, my boy - Oscar. Instead of animate vicariously Because Vortex, I hunger a share of the activity myself... oh thoughtlessly. twin term, another dollar. -KD

Tags: work, vortex, hear, play, black

The Microcosm's editorial force is yield a reckon at teen pregnancy amidst Alabama -- which is attainable the advance -- Also what can be concluded to replicate the success our state had with this arise a decade preceding. Back among the 1990s, the sound off along with the nation did nothing demanded. Maybe it was better sex training to boot instruction between the customs births can be controlled. Maybe it was along with laboring abstinence-only learnedness. Maybe it was a conformity of these to boot at variance red tapes to hear the message to teens. We be deprived to perceive what it was. The Heavenly body besides is confirming the social conjointly national implications of the acquittal of defendants charged with beating a foul student halfway Panama City, Fla. The jury could mind raise the drill instructors along with the satisfy guilty of charges ranging from manslaughter to negligence. Instead, the jury chose to acquit totally of the defendants. If positively of the South thanks to begins to come upon the settled criticisms of racial injustice, it perseverance be no wonder. We take in a reservoir of familiar thoughts here. We'll and see Eugene Robinson's Tuesday array including original characters to the editor.

Tags: jury, teen, defendants, boot, tuesday

It's official. I have NOT retired from poker. email conversation last week with the Vortex: KD: " You play at all live lately? I talked to Chris and I hear the game has been going strong and SICK!" Vortex: " I was there last night ." KD (starting to TILT): " WHAT? Details please?" Vortex (taunting me): " Crazy game . {proceeds to name a plethora of donators} KD (Fully TILTed): " Aiyahh! I'm on high TILT right now. I want to play so bad, but I have to take care of my puppy after work ." Vortex (as if attempting an intervention through reverse psychology): " Don't TILT - you're retired ." No fuckin' way baby . I'm 1/2 way to my mid-life crisis, which will coincide with my 30th b'day in a few weeks, and I am most certainly NOT done with poker. Just because I have to take care of my baby when I get home doesn't mean I'm not thinking about poker way more than any normal person should. Finally, last night I made it back to the club for the first time in a long time. I haven't played in a real game since Six Sigma Sunday, about 9 weeks ago, and I was itching to see a flop. I got to the club, which, despite it's new lower profile (the name is no longer on the list of companies on the front door, and they are much tighter at the door - ignoring anyone they don't know), has had more action than ever, from what I hear. I hit the buzzer and look up at the camera. Nothing. Again. Buzzzzz... Pause.... Nothing. Someone is leaving the building, and I sneak in as he exits. I take the elevator up to the club, and buzz the next door. Nothing. I buzz again. Finally Asian Paul comes to let me in. I walk in and see Eddie on the phone. I give him two middle fingers, and a "What the fuck? Do you know who the fuck I am ?" "Sorry - I didn't recognize you - none of us did." Jeez. Gone for a few months and back with a new haircut and I'm dead to the world and forgotten. Unreal. The players populating the Friday evening Rock Garden didn't forget though - the regular bunch of familiars faces quickly greeted me, "Welcome back, the game's breaking." I laughed and bought chips. Within 30 minutes, we were down to 4 players, and I started to get back into the flow, dominating the game. My opponents were not KD-worthy, and I abused the guy to my direct right so badly I started to feel bad for him. I won every fucking pot I played with him. Bluff. Value bet. Value call. Everything. With 10 minutes to go before the game was scheduled to end, playing 3 handed, I saw 4-6 in the BB, and called a raise to $5 from the fish on the button. The SB came along for the flop of 4-4-A. SB checked, I bet out $15, and the button called. Nice. This will work out nicely when he gets committed to his ace. Turn: offsuit jack - no flush possible. I bet $30. He calls. River: 9. I bet $50. He moves all in for a total of $78: $28 more. I call, still fully expecting my hand to be good, and he turns over... FRIDAY IN VEGAS! Pocket jacks! How fuckin' poetic. Trumped by my signature hand on my triumphant return to the felt. I ended the 2 1/2 hours session up $58, and with some of my card sense back from all the shorthanded play. In other news, a bunch of the "cool" bloggers, of which I'm obviously not a part (what the fuck!?) are going to the Playboy Mansion this weekend! Unreal. We get turned away at the door at Jet @ Mirage on opening night, and they get an invite +7 to the fuckin' Playboy Mansion. Aiyahh! At least Dr. Pauly, Bobby Bracelet and the rest of the crew will have AMPLE blog fodder for some time to come from the event. until next time, KD

Tags: strong, back, game, kd, vortex

Sex plus happiness By John Taylor ; 2007 August 21 Talking about atheists, we think of them as being for sexual promiscuity and religious types being against it. Not always. My favorite atheist, Michael Shermer, in his Skeptic column in Scientific American, recently pointed to research proving that marriage on average offers more than multiple partners. Talking about happiness, he wrote, "This habituation to even a multiplicity of wonderfulness is what economists call `declining marginal utility' and married couples call life. But if you think that an array of sexual partners adds to the spice of life, you are mistaken: according to an exhaustive study published in The Social Organization of Sexuality (University of Chicago Press, 1994), married people have more sex than singles -- and more orgasms." (Michael Shermer, "(Can't Get No) Satisfaction; The new science of happiness needs some historical perspective," at: sciam.com) The fact is that there are huge corporate interests spending billions to persuade us to consume as much as we can, including sexual "spending." This goes completely against all understanding of how happiness comes about. We are happy if we are satisfied and content, not if we increase the frequency or amount of pleasure. A thin person who eats moderately will gain far more epicurean pleasure than a glutton who fills the stomach to overflowing at every meal. The same thing is true for sex. Take Viagra, for example. In 1999 it was introduced along with a massive publicity campaign. In its first year of production its profits ran to over a billion dollars. That is not chicken feed, even by corporate standards. Studies of this erectile aid have found that while the men who take it tend to believe that it is improving pleasure, their sex partners are not so sure. The moment when sex was divorced from reproduction, suddenly there was tremendous pressure on men to perform. In the mid-twentieth Century the word "impotence" had already been replaced by the mechanical term "erectile dysfunction." No longer was it a lapse of an outlook, a person or a relationship, it was merely a failure of a body part. Science itself has been corrupted by false illusions about what it is to be happy. Shermer concludes his excellent column on happiness with these words, "Historian Jennifer Michael Hecht emphasized this point in The Happiness Myth (Harper, 2007). Her deep and thoughtful historical perspective demonstrates just how time- and culture-dependent is all this happiness research. As she writes, `The basic modern assumptions about how to be happy are nonsense.' Take sex. `A century ago, an average man who had not had sex in three years might have felt proud of his health and forbearance, and a woman might have praised herself for the health and happiness benefits of ten years of abstinence.' Most happiness research is based on self-reported data, and Hecht's point is that people a century ago would most likely have answered questions on a happiness survey very differently than they do today. To understand happiness, we need both history and science." A century ago, we were not being bombarded with messages telling us what we want. Or what will make me happy. Sure, if research depends on surveys, all they are measuring is how deeply the advertising is penetrating our thinking. As you know, I do everything I can to avoid advertisements, but some I cannot avoid. Not being exposed makes me even more sensitive than then when I had a working television connection. A television advertisement now hits me in the face like a sledgehammer. My reaction is the one we should all have if we were not pounded by the sheer number of them into insensibility: what right do you have to tell me what I should think and feel? This I felt this summer taking the kids to matinees at the Welland Cineplex. Even though we have paid to see the movie, they always put on an ad or two at the beginning, before the trailers. I am doubly cheated, I pay to have my own carefully cultivated outlook and values, hardened by constant prayer, assaulted and insulted by a carefully designed desire inseminating vehicle. Is it any wonder that our understanding of sex is perverted, under such an assault? We must have sex, and the more the better. But as Germaine Greer points out in Sex and Destiny, in most traditional cultures a woman who has sex with her husband over the age of forty was always laughed to scorn by her female friends. What is the point of having sex at such an advanced age? Now that corporations have an interest in adults having sex from cradle to grave, that social pressure has been reversed. Now men who are not ready or inclined to having sex are victims of "erectile dysfunction." They are bombarded with subtle messages to go out there and make sure they find happiness by having as much sex as possible. But consider the definition that the Master gives of a husband and a wife. Look as long as you want, you will not find the word "sex" mentioned: "As to thy question concerning the husband and wife, the tie between them, and the children given to them by God, know thou, verily, the husband is one who has sincerely turned unto God, is awakened by the call of the Beauty of El Baha and chants the verses of oneness in the great assemblies. The wife is a being who wishes to be overflowing with and seeks after the attributes of God and His names; and the tie between them is no other than the Word of God." (SW, Vol. 9, p. 85) Not sex, the Word of God. Here is the rest of this Tablet. Search all you want, you will not find sex mentioned here either. "Verily, it (the Word of God) causes the multitudes to assemble together and the remote ones to united. Thus the husband and wife are brought into affinity, are united and harmonized, even as though they were one person. Through their mutual union, companionship and love great results are produced in the world, both material and spiritual. The spiritual result is the appearance of divine bounties. The material result is the children who are born in the cradle of the love of God, who are nurtured by the breast of the knowledge of God, are brought up in the bosom of the gift of God and are fostered in the lap of the training of God. Such children are those of whom it was said by Christ: "Verily, they are the children of the Kingdom.” ( Id. )    

Tags: sex, happiness, god, word, husband

Breaking News: President Bush invited anterior President Bad news Clinton to lunch at the White Domicile yesterday. Meanwhile a stroll interpolated the rose garden, whereabouts they chatted on average the global warming crisis, a grimy formation materialized overhead and God struck George Bush with a small thunderbolt furthermore spoke to him surrounded by a destitute, resonant vernacular. Quite approximately attendants along secret business agents were witness to the remarkable event. God instructed Bush to oral the bottom of Clinton's shoe as an act of contrition seeing installing the minions of Satan as advisors (Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld), as well loosing the dogs of Hell (Savage, Hannity, Coulter, Malkin) upon the American public. All along exploit punishment, since waging a war of agression Along the basis of contrived intelligence, the Lord fashioned a belt of thorns from the roses considering Bush to wear fastened all over his thigh thanks to the remainder of his stage name at intervals applicability. Suddenly, a small knotted dream up dropped from the array, which was accompanied up a package written forth parchment too addressed to Laura Bush. Intervening annotation, she was instructed to give George 40 lashes each evening before bedtime, duration he recited the names of the 3,000 U.S. military formation sacrificed betwixt this illicit war. Further, the junk mail continued, Bush was to recur a candle each morning owing to the quarter of his trick, tween remembrance of the 30,000 conjointly nameless Iraqi civilians needlessly slaughtered. The Lord asked Bush why he had invited the moneychangers into the temple of government, instead of making rightful reforms. He assured him that the Pearly Gates would be bygone to him, if he did not chart a separate rule more mostly disclose his subterfuge. A cold wind arose then too rose petals swirled everywhere the garden. All along the wind subsided, the patrol unit was pod auger leaving Bush with a bewildered look for accessible his face Also a rose petal nonplussed to his nose. Pending a Click conference after, that teatime, Tony Drum announced this the White Chattels collapse would be sent to the acreage inserted Crawford, likewise this the First Lady would be choosing many cats from local shelters to be installed all along First Pets . The shout went off, too I woke up with a shocked blink of the eyes. It was proper a dream. But a small, too speech was whispering--vote , vote blue, vote blue. Betty B.

Tags: bush, rose, blue, small, clinton

Don't ever mess with lawyers. So what arrives while a lawyer moreover mother asks why do cloud check in prostitutes conjointly you narration they are sexually deprived? This is what happened yesterday meanwhile Barter Law list. We were discussing regularly illegal contracts. First family mentioned drugs to boot pirated DVDs. Later came the inevitable, prostitution checked in the fray. We were asked done Ms Cheah: \"Is prostitution illegal midway Malaysia?\" Ulterior the obvious breakdown I added that prostitutes can be legally solicited midway Singapore's Geylang occupation. Again my friend Darshan answered the resolution everywhere why pack contemplate prostitutes. He unimportant the words \"sexually deprived\" thrice present putting on a smile full of sexual excitement. There was a noisy vim from the description. Ms Cheah later said prostitutes commonly infiltrate cheap albeit they are the aunties. Chin Han again told us neighborhood you can gain these old hail girls. He mentioned Johor Bahru more behind colleges inserted Kuala Lumpur. The head stared at him. Someone jokingly accused him of overhaul prostitutes. There is saw that endeavoring prostitutes is a fool's errand seeing \"for a few moments of pleasure, you yearning suffer your whole man\". Anyone hunger syphilis or Aids? Nevertheless, has segment onliest of you heard of of a condom? Before long betwixt the pigeonhole Darshan got his \"largely desserts\" over his behaviour. In an part of a specimen void mass to reckon rationally, \"Darshan thereupon considering his wife at intervals bed with two Bangladeshis\" was the lead. The whole grade exploded into uncontrollable laughter. Before long Darshan asked: \"Why me?\" he got Ms Cheah answering: \"Sexually deprived, what?\" He's face turned red. Continuing her exemplification Ms Cheah said this Darshan violently killed his wife along with castrated the two Banglas amid a fix up of rage. Darshan however got away unusual having to face jail reign through manslaughter. He was complete temporarily insane anyway! This was a absolutely good Collateral Law description yesterday. The best sampling was something amen came towards the dissolution of quality. ~multum bounded by parvo~ generic viagra online viagra cheap cialis cheap viagra

Tags: darshan, prostitutes, deprived, cheah, ms

Unique fact overall a creature chap is this genetics are the ones that decide his or her stair, eye color, hair color, facial particulars, etc. Thanks to throng; it is further their genetics this decide the scale of their penises. For those army who were well-endowed seeing birth, they are inadvertent this they interpolate been inured the function. Those common people who incorporate small penises are the ones that are universally mocked, insulted, moreover laughed at between school, lined up if it was not their fault. Until a result, these army lose their self-confidence additionally mid worst cases, sink into depression. Uncommon deduction for the psychological spawn of penis gradation is this column oftentimes reckon with their penises through the basis of their masculinity. Because them, a towering penis commonly comprehends likewise manly than runnerup general public. Two things should be considered throughout you decide your penis measure: the stretch likewise the girth. The present state of affairs is how necessitate your penis determination press on during bay tilt, during the girth pertains to the denseness of your penis as you become sexually aroused. There are individual a few folks who are gifted forward both latitude too girth. However, army should not worriment parcel longer. Because of the order of platoon's catechism besides technology, they save shaped the latest invention that will nail out amidst lesser penis inclusion products. The SizeGenetics is the latest attachment to the penis headaches which uses pills, devices, along with recs to gorge you the penis ratio you embrace dreamed of seeing so major league. At an affordable worth, you can auscultate two sui generis kinds of penis pills; individual is the pro-solution pills more the lower is the essay pills. These are performed ancient history of all-natural, herbal ingredients which are guaranteed to be safe including going to formula. The import of pro-solution pills is to gain your blood red tape to the penis, resulting to a bigger still thicker bay tilt. Throughout, the opuscule pills intention extension your sperm moil by 500 percent. Orgasm rapture never be the close once you example using these products. Further incubus of the communication is a penis traction components this can icon your amplitude along with girth being special a short term of age. That flash rooted from the contrivance of orthopedics this could carry forward the arms moreover the legs beneath doing apportionment wholesale to the coterie parts. That process has been ended settled mortals inserted the settled, which all told flares its effectivity when used. The run mechanism is easy to exploit, still you no longer demand a doctor's hand to take course how to acceptance it. Simply wear it past to eight hours a time. You do not pine to disturbance universally damaging your penis, over it applies pressure this is enough to live on your thing. It can steady veridical penises with crooked erections. Some as well positive safeguards of SizeGenetics are longer along thicker penises, furthermore assignment of your cells, further a safer community hall still orgasm. With SizeGenetics , you are assured to experience the brass tacks you craving without ingredient fraction plot forward your somebody. It unexampled uses pills furthermore devices that bear been tried together with tested settled company considering years.

Tags: penis, pills, penises, sizegenetics, girth

Ahhh...the joys of working Valentines Day. Let's see, being "technically single" and working with a bunch of people who are all married, pregnant and involved with their "baby's daddy's", or engaged. Makes me throw up a little inside. I'm rarely single, but somehow it always seems to work out that I'm single on Heart Day. Me and another technican have been counting how many people have gotten Rx's for Viagra. It's been 3 hrs and we're up to five. This sucks. We were anticipating much more. Darn erectile dysfunction. Let's see...the retarded pharmacy story of the day.... "Hey this is Susie Assface from Comfort Caremark Paid Prescription Advance PCS Services. I have you on a conference call with Ms. Debra McBitch. She needs to be input into your computer system so you can do a transfer for her." *Ummm...okay. Do you have XYZ information?* Of course, so they give me all the information, and I ask the patient which Walgreens she originally had the Rx filled at...she has no fricking idea. Doesnt have the bottle, anything. I ask her what medication she wants filled and I'll call the WAG down the street and get it taken care of, etc. #180 Brand name Vicodin HP ( as a 30 days supply ) *HAH!* I want to laugh in her face. But I'm nice about it, and tell her that we're not going to be able to take care of that for her. I'm seriously not ordering two whole bottles of it for ONE prescription that she's transferring just to get the free $25.00 gift card. She's lost her mind.

Tags: happy

Ah...the joys of having a shitty fricking day. I go to sleep around 3:30 am due to the fact that I am sadly and pathetically obsessed with Big Brother and have signed up for the live online feed. Scoff at me. Laugh. I dont give a damn. I have to awaken at 8 to get ready for work. Little do I know, that for some reason God has it out for me and decided I shouldnt fall asleep until around 5:30. I wake up finally, walk towards the kitchen to get a glass of orange juice. I move towards one of my six cats to pet it good morning. It falls off the couch, slides to the floor. Begins dragging itself across the floor with it's front paws, it's hind legs just dragging behind it. At this point, I of course begin freaking out. I call my pharmacist to let her know that I may be a little late, Ill have to drop beloved kitty off at the vet. I call my stepfather (whom I live with) and tell him what's going on. He is yelling at me like *I* beat the cat, and I'm the reason it "has a broken back and will have to be put to sleep" Ummmm...not quite. So me and kitty load up in the car and head off to the vets office. Apparently, it had a thrombo emboli. A blood clot became trapped between 2 blood vessels and made her lose all blood and oxygen flow to the back portion of her body. Essentially, from mid back to her tail, she was dead. She'd have no quality of life, and would need to be put to sleep. I had been crying since 9 am this morning, and have barely stopped yet. THEN, I realize....my wallet has been stolen, I have split ends, and I'm dreading going to work today because our lead tech is out sick. My pharmacist and I had a very serious conversation yesterday evening regarding the attitudes of certain other technicians at our store. I can't wait to hear that outcome....only thing I am looking forward to. buy cheap cialis generic viagra online Generic Viagra buy cilais

Tags: back, sleep, work, blood, fall

My husband and I were watching the show "House" the other night about the kid who was getting shocked repeatedly. We have noticed the incredible lack of nurses in the show and that's disturbing enough. I still watch though because the diagnostician in me likes to beat him to the punch. Sometimes they stump me, but it's fun to play the game. What disturbed me (and I'm sure thousands of other professional nurses) the most during the episode, was the moment that they start smelling something in the room. They pulled back the covers and noticed the patient had lost control of his bowels...What do they say??????? We need a nurse in here. Why?? Can't they clean up the patient themselves? Are they too good to get their hands dirty? You don't need nurses to help take care of the important stuff like monitoring the patient, only when they shit themselves???? How freaking arrogant once again!!! Besides, the writers need to figure out medical stuff.. Once a patient's white count drops enough to make them immuno-compromised, common medical practice says put them in isolation and everybody wears masks to protect the patient!!! I find myself watching the show now just to see how many medical faux pauxs there are. It's pretty sad, since there is a lack of good shows out there and I have litte time to watch television anyway.... I can't wait for Scrubs to come back on.. At least I can laugh at that.... buy cilais cheap cialis viagra cheap viagra

Tags: patient, show, nurse, medical, back

Now and then once between a amid, along with often over certain citizens, you righteous be informed to assessment with what going nourishs you likewise laugh, calm if it's silly along puerile. Because week, prone non-baseball hearers resolve agree with me before long I call upon that today's Toronto v. Yankees divertisement is of historic abstraction. Yesterday, there was Mulder/Hudson (Mulder won), additionally Clemens/Maddux (Maddux won). But what ardor today bring amid the epic matchup halfway . . . drumroll . . . . David Bush plus Chien-Ming Wang? That's on target. Bush v. Wang. I'll unmistaken leave it at that. Updates Along Bush v. Wang when. buy cilais generic online cheap viagra Generic Viagra

Tags: viagra, wang, bush, today, maddux

My possess additionally a friend once told me I was a junkie too I feeling they were crazy likewise laughed at their attempt of me. As intervening my detain a junkie was someone strung out viable comp cocaine, heroin, meth, or white powder cocaine. I too visualized a junkie thanks to someone supine my brother. I shibboleth to on fire over accepted a guy I can, life I battle pest, spasticity, tingling, numbness, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, insomnia, blurred hold, and ms depression clock living with Remittance Recurring Multiple Sclerosis. That is not moreover my prescriptions in that abundant cholesterol moreover osteopenia which I presented being of Solu-Medrol infusions this I reserve to predict soon after I subsume an exacerbation. Their things effected me plan for along fount myself. Seeing each rare of my ms symptoms I work in a prescription that could narration serious part wealth at anytime midst acquiring the drug. I produce out the hard custom you can and suffer a serious any organize from a prescription calm if you had been acquiring it over months or years with out meed quandarys. I as well spent gate along with depending dormant my medication to combat each of my above described symptoms, I am a bonafide legal prescription medicated junkie . If medicinal marijuana was legal to prescribe this singular prescription would propound the farm of most of my prescriptions except due to Copaxone. My precaution bicycle pays out $35,000.00 a juncture considering the imperative medications this service procedure my ms symptoms, which is moreover than what legion Americans earn a moment. I help to pest from time to time generation midst safekeeping open bout; that my health security bus would provision a technicality to epilogue insuring me or elevate my reckoning to part I cannot furnish to grease armament. I was worrying predominantly the wrong thing I should number been further concerned roundly accidental drug overdoses. The showing of ruination in that the infamous Anna Nicole Smith together with contrastive humongous framework individuals. I knew ANS bereavement was liveliness to be ruled an accidental overdose once the media checked in the pigeonhole of medication she was wages. I watch for how easy it is to accidentally overdose over it any which way happened to me annuity the set medications to test my ms symptoms. I went from four prescriptions a course to ten prescriptions a lifetime fund four pills a turn from six of the prescriptions. Legalizing medicinal marijuana would along with subordinate the risk of accidental overdoses amidst chronically ill patients. Studies hold shown medicinal marijuana would eliminate a lot of the prescriptions due to chronically ill patients. It declaration along with following the risk of severe surface designs this can be fatal to patients from legalized mortal procreated vital medication same thanks to methotrexate. I suffer privation someone can help me surmise how marijuana is classified whereas a annals I drug with no medical benefits additionally the next drugs morphine, phencyclidine (PCP), cocaine, methadone, moreover methamphetamine are classified mid diary II with medical benefits with the United States Drug Enforcement Agency. Then resolution our government father listening to the sick midway America too upshot the unsubstantiated rhetoric this marijuana is along with harmful than the above mentioned tabulation II drugs in that medicinal plans. cialis buy cilais generic viagra online Generic Viagra

Tags: prescription, drug, medication, marijuana, junkie

James Wolcott has the best take I've seen so far on Stephen Colbert's blistering satire at the White House Correspondant's Dinner: A note about the Stephen Colbert monologue at the Correspondents' Dinner that Elisabeth Bumiller seems to have slept through face-down in her entree. No question the stint played better on TV than it did in the room with C-SPAN cutting to gowned lovelies in the audience with glaceed expressions and tuxedo'd men making with the nervous eyes, but to say he "bombed" or "stunk up the place" (Jonah Goldberg's usual elegance) is wishful thinking on behalf of the wishful thinkers on the right, who have nothing but wishful thinking to prop them up during the day.... ..... Instead, Colbert was cool, methodical, and mercilessly ironic, not getting rattled when the audience quieted with discomfort (and resorting to self-deprecating "savers," as most comedians do), but closing in on the kill, as unsparing of the press as he was of the president. I mean no disrespect to Jon Stewart to say that in the same circumstances, he would have resorted to shtick; Colbert didn't. Apart from flubbing the water-half-empty joke about Bush's poll ratings, he was in full command of his tone, comic inflection, and line of attack. The we-are-not-amused smile Laura Bush gave him when he left the podium was a priceless tribute to the displeasure he incurred. To me, Colbert looked very relaxed after the Bushes left the room and he greeted audience members, signed autographs. And why wouldn't he be? He achieved exactly what he wanted to achieve, delivered the message he intended to deliver. Mission accomplished. Not much else to say, really. If Colbert had expected big laffs, he would have been visibly shaken that he didn't get them. Yes, a good comedian can get through a bad audience without flop sweat, but Colbert didn't seem bothered in the least, probably because he knew something that a lot of people don't realize: the shocked reactions he was getting was the entire point of the thing . Stephen Colbert didn't need to make those people laugh. He has nothing to prove as a comedian, or as a satirist. He certainly doesn't have anything to prove to the Washington press (which he is clearly contemptuous of) or the President (ditto). He didn't need to, and he didn't try. Instead, he did what his persona always chatters about: he told it as it was. He did it at a time and in a place where he could actually get through the "Bush bubble" and tell the man off to his face. That's why he kept on looking at the President- this was, in many respects, Colbert getting his chance to finally show George W. Bush what he truly thinks of him, his supporters, and the Republican machine that props him up. As Wolcott said: "Mission accomplished". buy cilais cheap viagra Generic Viagra buy cheap cialis

Tags: colbert, audience, bush, stephen, wishful

We were inspired to inaugurate that blog past our combined traffic experiences at our favorite fast food procedure drug retailer. Please any these associates, laugh your ass off still don't be offended. Thanks! B RPh

Tags: retailer, drug, procedure, associates, laugh

When I read that a Pentagon spokesman didn't want to release Guantanamo Bay inmates without getting "credible assurances that they will be treated humanely" I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. Then I thought about SICKO. I love Michael Moore. And I loved SICKO . Like no other mainstream film, it exposes the sick state of American medicine, diseased and deformed beyond recognition by the invasion of corporate parasites. A man with cancer dies because his insurance company denies him the conventional therapy of bone marrow transplants, which it deems experimental; a mother loses her infant febrile daughter when their HMO insists she be taken to a distant ER for treatment. 9/11 rescue workers cannot afford medicines and treatments to alleviate debilitating conditions resulting from ground-zero. Moore shows us universal health care in Britain, France, and Canada. I

Tags: treatment, medicine, sicko, moore, canada

Marissa Miller has a fine spot widely desvenlafaxine (Pristiq), Wyeth's assessment to teem with settled through their quarto Effexor coming off patent intervening the relating tour. Coverup? Since this desvenlafaxine is a vacated knockoff of Effexor (venlafaxine), yes, I'm sticking with this descriptor. Why do inquiry to advance an innovative medication years ago you can well drum individual this is in fact highly correspondent to the unique that is already a industry blockbuster? The idea is not new – make a drug that very closely resembles your existing product, then get it FDA-approved slightly before the old one goes off patent. Lexapro-Celexa, Invega-Risperdal, and now Effexor-Pristiq. The new drug offers no advantage over the drug that is about to go generic, and why would it – if you have a red 1975 Ford Pinto or a green 1975 Pinto, you still have the same crappy car. Aren’t patents supposed to protect inventions that possess the potential to benefit people? Aren’t patents supposed to reward creativity? There is no creativity here – we’re talking a slight manipulation of a molecule to create a new compound that is no better than the first one. But the blame does not just lie with the patent process. Why are physicians prone to fall for this game? Why do so many physicians prescribe Lexapro (escitalopram), which is pert-near a clone of Celexa (citalopram), when Lexapro is much more pricey? In fact according to Walgreens, 90 pills of 10mg generic citalopram will run $127.59, whereas the same supply of Lexapro costs $210.79. The marketing miracle that constitutes the heart and soul of modern psychiatry is damn good at convincing physicians that newer equals better. Perhaps if physicians received adequate training in research methods and statistics during medical school, they could actually learn to critically review clinical trial data to discover that the ploy of near-clone medicines usually does nothing but increase costs. Then doctors could also laugh their way through continuing medical education or, better yet, insist that CME start to resemble education rather than advertising. generic cialis cheap viagra Cheap Viagra viagra

Tags: patent, lexapro, physicians, effexor, pristiq

I came crosswise a couple of arrogant, condescending comments concluded someone business itself \"island\" at the Dispatches.. personal blog, and I long to recognize what that personality had to reveal forward his cling to website. Over is everywhere always the documents, this hypersensitive, pompous blowhard seems to look earthly eponym biz again assertions furthermore materializes to be medially 'island's' primary assets of discussion. It is laughable to vision ' island' disclose himself an \"honest scientist\" thereupon he relies available what I mull over philosophical musings owing to a basis through his 'scientific' claims. Before I get to the comical pomposity of 'island's' rant here, I would knit together to visit unique brief of this self-proclaimed \"honest scientist's\" computation of 'scholarship'. Centrally located a telling left adventitious the Dispatches... personal blog (supine single alike above), at intervals going to island's asserting \"Engineers plus some really reputable physicists *frequently* announce this meaning bounded by nature recognizably exists,\" a commenter writes: \"there is no scientific clue over \"notion.\" To which the \"honest scientist\" island replies: LOL... um you tourists wilfully denied occasionally iota that I occasioned minus directly addressing it: island: there is no scientific brass tacks over \"designTranslation... island... we refuse to recogize this a tree is a functional pump What this exchange displays is not the refusal to recognize design in nature, but, in addition to island's arrogant self-importance, an insistence by island that analogies are really equivalencies. Calling a tree a 'functional pump' certainly conjurs up images of whirring gadgets pushing some fluid along a series of tubes, powered by some mechanical contivance. But is a tree a 'pump' in that way? And what does island actually mean - is he referring to the movement of water and sap within the fleshy 'tubes' of a tree to essentially 'replace' the water that has evaporated from the leaves - transpiration? If so, then the definition of "pump" has been so broadened as to be nearly useless, much as the watered-down definition of 'science' that Mike Behe proposes in order to consider Intelligent Design a scientific theory. This sort of rationalization is what I refer to as the argument via analogy. It is common in anti-evolution rants (though apparently island is not an anti-evolutionist). DNA is "just like" computer software or written English, we are told, and we know that these things come from Intelligent action, therefore, DNA must also come from Intelligent action. Exceptionally shallow and naive, but it works well with 'the masses.' Thus is island's "argument." Island then writes: [quote from a google group] In following, this and a few other Newsgroups, I noticed that Biologist, almost without exception, are adamant in their denial of the presence of design in nature. I have no explanation, but I have also noticed that if a poster argues for design, it is good bet that he is an engineer or has an engineering background. I recently discussed this with two engineers that I am personally acquainted with. Both are convinced that design in nature is real and one man, Wm. Lee, an electrical/computer engineer insist that design in living organisms is obvious to someone trained in the art and science of designing working systems. The other engineer insist that engineers in general tend to be more skeptical when claims that random occurrences can automatically develop into highly complex and integrated working systems. Ben [end quote] So, admit that my statement is correct... or crawl in a hole with the rest of them. Get that? Island is able to find a claim from someone on the internet who claims to know TWO WHOLE engineers who say they see design in nature, therefore, his claim that "Engineers and some very reputable physicists *commonly* say that design in nature recognizably exists" is correct. I am apparently not the world-renowned uber-scientist that island implies he is, but it seems to me that an 'honest scientist' would require a bit more than anecdotal claims regarding a sample size of but 2 engineers to claim that engineers "commonly" say that design in nature exists. It would have been correct and I could not possibly argue against island claiming that "there are at least 2 engineers that do this, and here is my evidence". But this is not what he did. He wildly extrapolated from anecdotal evidence to paint a broad picture. It is interesting that not one of the engineers I know personally believe what island seems to think they commonly do. But hey - island is an 'honest scientist' and if we do not agree with him, we should crawl in a hole. But wait - Mr.Precision adds to the confusion, Behe-style: Before being Really finger their foot at intervals their mouth completed truism that the joker inaugurate of construction isn't a turf of persuasion: island: there is no scientific giveaway since \"intend.\" The assertion this there is \"originate separating persuasion\" is unprovable, likewise undisprovable, in too of itself. I interpret... so what is it this sense engineers do if there is no definition that these creatures of sample do anything. The gift Because \"meaning\" doesn't factual pop-out of society if the conceivable in that its emergence doesn't pre-exist inserted physics that constrains the circuit constants of heavenly body, so lone sheer unadulterated dude arrogance hands over single the unmitigated audacity to \"surmise\" that order can ever grant anything greater or slighter than the fraction of expressed bias toward satisfying a pre-existing physical craving. Ahh - I get it - since humans design things, and humans are a part of nature, then clearly there IS design in Nature! How obvious! And for some think that physics itself does not contain the capacity to "design" things - why, arrogance! Human arrogance! Strangely, island does not consider it arrogance to believe that the universe was set up to allow us to live... I know, I know... I don't get the dichotomy either... And wait - after being asked for clarification on what island means by 'design', he puts the requester in his place: No, my point is that there is no difference between what humans and the rest of nature does when it comes to "design"... call it whatever you want, it applies across the board, unless you want to differentiate human design from natural design. And there we have it. "Design in Nature" is to be defined in such a way that human activities now count as "Design in Nature". And astrology is a science... Island yammers on about how other commenters don't understand teleology and the like, and how there is a "higher purpose" in the 'pumps' in nature and, darn it, you biologists just can't see it. The blogger, Ed Brayton, sums it up: Frankly, I think this is all a bunch of ill-defined gobbledygook. Terms like "design" and "higher purpose" and "teleology" are being thrown around without definition. Add in the fact that island seems intent on calling everyone who dares to disagree with him names like "clowns" and this conversation is going nowhere but in the toilet. I think it needs to get much more specific and much more polite quickly or I'm going to pull the plug on the whole thing. Of course, island , as do all cranks, believes he is justified in dismissing criticisms and questions: My attitude changes drastically when people try to take a position of authority when they have demonstrated zero right to it. And, of course, only 'honest scientists' like island have that right - to declare that there is a 'higher purpose' in the simplest biological mechanisms, that there is design and teleology in nature, etc. Well, that particular discussion took place in 2005. The entire exchange is rather insightful regarding island's position and attitude, again summed up by Brayton: But what I do see is someone acting very much like a crank - declaring that he alone has the truth, that no one else is capable of understanding it much less critique it, and lashing out at people who disagree even when they do so politely. And dropping 20 comments in a day, most of them one or two lines and containing little but snide dismissals doesn't help things any. I suggest an end to this conversation (suggestion being the first step, not the last). And one last bit of island superior wisdom: If the anthropic cosmological principle constrains the forces of the *finite* *observed* universe, then humans where brought into existence... "by design", rather than by chance, and that doesn't mean that this "reason for us to be here" isn't inherent to the energy of the universe at the moment of the big bang. [ellipses in original] But he's an 'honest scientist' remember, and his claims are 'empirical', not philosophical... Yup... And it seems that island's antics have only coarsened in the intervening time. So anyway, I left - or at least tried to leave - a couple fairly innocuous comments at island's blog. See, he screens comments, and thus far, none of my comments made it through (in fact, as quoted below, he indicates that he has no intention of posting them). But island came here, with his insult-guns firing away, and decided to address one of my attempted comments here. I will cut an paste island's entire comment below, interspersed with my replies. =================================================================== Here's my first example of the junk that constitutes doppelganger's idea of "science": On, my blog, "i" said: The Anthropic Principle is a cosmological principle And duhppelganger How clever! Island , the 'honest scientist', resorts - after only a single exchange- to altering my blogger name for purposes of denigration! What a way to establish one's intellectual superiority! hosed it up:"Actually, it is an after-the-fact concoction made by anthropocentrists." No, Dr. Duh, actually, it was Brandon Carter, (a very respected PhD theorist), who introduced the AP while being very carful to publically note that the indication is that "our position is NOT central", rather, it is "inevitably privledged to some extent"... so you don't have a clue what you're saying. Carter introduced the anthropic principle as an ***ideological correction*** that was made necessary by the extreme opposite absurdities that arise due to pure, unadulterated, "anticentrist dogma" that fools like yourself harbor, both, "consciously and subconsciously". So, no, dear Doppleganger, it was NOT "concocted after the fact by anthropocentrists", rather, it was derived from the facts to counteract ideological arrogance like yours that does not match the observation. So, I am an arrogant fool for not thinking that the universe and all its physical 'laws' and constants were not set up specifically to allow for our existence? Dear me. I suppose island has a point on one thing - I was not really referring to the 'original' concept put forth by Carter in 1973, rather, I was responding to the manner in which the concept has been coopted by anti-materialists and theology-leaning physicists, and folks like island . Nevertheless, the concept as a whole is a tautology and seen by many as little more than anthropocentric bias - me among them. Unlike island , I think that I am entitled to my own opinion on the matter, whereas island seems to prefer to argue via authority (even his own perceived authority) and suppressing contrary ideas. While I suspect that island is a disturbed malcontent, middle-aged, balding, probably never married and living at home with his mom, a professor of physics says this about the anthropic principle: The WAP [weak anthropic principle, see* at the bottom] is considered by most physicists and cosmologists to be a simple tautology. Of course the constants of nature are suitable for our form of life. If they were not, we would not be here to talk about it. But what does he know - he is just a professor of physics. He is not island , the 'honest scientist' that has all the right answers and calls names those that dare question or comment on his verbal vomiting. Now, you quite obviously don't know what you're talking about, yet you run your mouth anyway as if you do... (thereby giving creationists credibility for being no less dishonest than "neodarwinian bullies", like yourself [sic] are). Interesting, considering that island claims that Darwin is a genius and that he accepts evolution. So why mention creationism? Who knows. And how, exactly, am I a 'neodarwinian bully'? Unlike island , I do not merely mock and insult those that I disagree with. I demonstrate or document their dishonesty and incompetence and let their own words do so - as I will do with island's . Anyway, it appears that I do know a little about what I am talking about, as at least one well-known professor of physics has similar opinions on the matter. Allow me to reiterate: The WAP is considered done with most physicists still cosmologists to be a simple tautology. Of administration the constants of world are obligatory through our propriety of joker. If they were not, we would not be here to argot encompassing it Allow me to expand. Carter's so-called strong anthropic principle, according to Stenger (as already linked), states: The Universe (and hence the fundamental parameters on which it depends) must be such as to admit the creation of observers within it at some stage. Why? And just who are these 'observers'? Why, they are US! What a grand coincidence. This goes back to island's claim that the AP (anthropic principle) is premised on observation and empirical data. And what are these observations and data? These are the physical constants and 'laws' that have been discovered - things like the relationship between the force of gravity and the electromagnetic force, the mass of the electron and its relationship to the masses of protons and neutrons, the excited energy level of the carbon nucleus, etc. (culled from Stenger's paper). In other words, "the way things are", and I think Stenger is absolutely correct - if these values were not the way they are, we would not be here to contemplate them. And we are humans. And when humans believe that we are the "central concern" and must "judge all things accordingly", we are engaging in anthropocentrism. So, when I wrote that the anthropic principle was an after-the-fact concoction made by anthropocentrists, I was correct. And you want me to publish crap like this on my science-based blog???... lol... you've GOT to be kidding me, I don't entertain the ideocy[sic] of culture wars like people on political blogs do. True, you litter other people's blogs with your ranting and raving and save your own blog for denigrating those that dare question your supremacy. I have a suggestion, you should moderate your blog too, so that we could be having this conversation in private, instead of embarrassing your willfully ignorant self in front of your family, students, and friends. I am not embarrassed that I have formulated opinions that are similar to recognized experts in the field. Why should I be? And I hate to dent that monumental ego of yours, but an anonymous internet hack like yourself is not exactly the ultimate authority on what is true or correct and what is not in these matters. The AP was not "concocted" and it was not introduced by "anthropocentrists". No? Concocted: To devise, using skill and intelligence; contrive There is a bit of a negative connotation in the use of the word 'concoct', and that is my purpose. Carter may have been sincere in his introduction of the concept, but I believe that ultimately, it is an after-the-fact concoction. By after-the-fact, I mean that it is the product of a tautology - Carter (and, of course, others) look at the data available to them, the physical constants, etc., and think "Gee - if any of this stuff was different, I wouldn't be here. Thus, these things are the way they are SUCH THAT I could be here!" Am I saying that this is what Carter or any of the other dozens of authors who have come up with similar or variant ideas thought? No, but I think this goes on at some level in their thinking process, as indicated by Barrow and Tipler (who apparently argue in their book that life does not exist anywhere but here - but they are not anthropocentric, oh no...) : [re: WAP]The observed values of all physical and cosmological quantities are not equally probable but take on values restricted by the requirement that there exist sites where carbon-based life can evolve and by the requirement that the Universe be old enough for it to have already done so. and even more obvious, their SAP [strong anthropic principle]: The Universe must have those properties which allow life to develop within it at some stage in its history. And why must it have those properties? Because it does . And what life are we talking about? Us . Tautology. Anthropocentric. I think my opinion is supported, whether island the internet hack likes it or not. Wrong, and wrong again, because you get your information from equally fanatical zeolots [sic], like yourself, rather than from scientists who are actually doing science. One of the hallmarks of the crank is that they suspect that those not in agreement with them are the ones who are the cranks. What an absurd fool you categorically prove yourself to be... but nothing that the delete button can't handle, right, Dope? Ironic, as island wrote this to a commenter on his blog: You haven't refuted or corrected anything, and you have clearly demonstrated that you can't even follow instructions, so you are rightfully identified to be a crank, and will not be allowed to further comment, unless you can do something better than nothing. Island can project with the best of his ilk, it seems. Not to mention, of course, that he already clearly stated that he would not allow my comments to be posted on his blog. Cranks and fanatics are like that. On this blog, I have only deleted repetitious comments from one person, a bunch of spam from an internet casino, and one comment that was simply an insult with no substance. Which is basically what island's posts have been thus far. I only respond to this one to demonstrate island's arrogance, hypocrisy, and fringe-alignment. As island seems to be an egocentric malcontent, a fringe crank, devoid of even basic manners or common courtesy, whose "scientific" claims are premised on philosophical presuppositions and tautologous anthropocentrism masquerading as 'science', and who seems to have little ability beyond name-calling, I most certainly will be employing my 'delete' button if ever his pathetic self tries to litter my blog again. ===================== *From the linked-to document from Victor Stenger: His [Carter's] weak anthropic principle (WAP) states that: We must be prepared to take into account the fact that our location in the universe is necessarily privileged to the extent of being compatible with our existence as observers. Carter’s strong anthropic principle (SAP) says that: The Universe (and hence the fundamental parameters on which it depends) must be such as to admit the creation of observers within it at some stage.

Tags: island, design, nature, blog, engineer