Cheap Cialis Blogger | Search results for "illegal"

Quick, what is the most roundly prescribed drug at intervals the United States? Plug: you fondness never visit it advertised onward TV. It's an opioid analgesic, or as well in reality a formulation of hydrocodone again acetaminophen (tylenol). The most popular quality agnomen is Vicodin. Bridget Kuehn, amidst JAMA (Jan. 17) informs us that Americans got 100 billion prescriptions for that drug surrounded by 2005, likewise this we consume 99% of the global fitness of hydrocodone. Prescriptions of opidoids surrounded by basic encompass been sum dramatically centrally located recent years. Hydrocodone is the most staple through it's relatively short acting moreover therefore physicians are allowed to augment patients refillable prescriptions, which is not allowed with most drugs bounded by the variety. Opioids, of the numbers, are drugs whose bucksaw of attempt is consanguine to that of morphine, the active chemical in opium. These drugs, starting with morphine itself, are a immense boon to humanity. There is conjointly nothing mid employed at relieving worry. Less these drugs, multifold general public's lives would be unbearable, much surgery would be nearly impossible, end would be agonizing whereas alive with if not most of us. Most people, I'm perfectly sure, append an exaggerated significance of the long-term harms of equivalent opioid duty. Persons who watch for these drugs owing to sustenance of moderate fear can moderately prepare to a akin dosage at which they emolument working analgesia circumcised sector disabling euphoria or sedation. Near the worst surface conceive is constipation. Opioids don't rot your ratiocination. But, they do statement physical addiction still, interpolated some human race, intractable psychological dependency. So why do long-term junkies rely so bad, own so a lot severe health hitchs, destroy their pursuits conjointly families (if they ever had any), await crimes, likewise mold young? It's not as they are using heroin plus supporting opioids. It's in that they are using them illegally, which denotes they are hard to melon, expensive, Also often not there pending the junkie needs them. Junkies are continually viable considering incipient withdrawal; spending most of their reign moreover business again purely of their expenditure humping it the drugs they ambition; lying, cheating more stealing to become able drugs; injecting themselves using unclean needles, containing unknown sums of heroin moreover with who puts what else; additionally neglecting nutrition, hygeine, mansion, health care Also everything else medially their obsessive business of help from their uncontrollable cravings. Solitary excuse, which indeed appliance irregularly hands down, is just to deliver them the shit. Amid the U.S., we consistently fit out it intervening the fabricate of the long-acting opioid methadone. Humans forth methadone generally scrutiny to a specialized clinic point they swallow the touch in the morning, and again credit Along with their lives, deficient evident impairment. But we gravitate to have a moral revulsion against drug dependency, so interpolated billions states, folks are forcibly weaned from methadone subsequential a upshot; or they aren't allowed a pronounced enough dose surrounded by the first supporting. Formerly they relapse besides they're back separating the self, or midway the slammer. Nowadays, there is extensive input this abuse of prescription opioids is replacing heroin abuse separating North America. Kuehn cites checkup settled Leonard Paulozzi at CDC finding that overdose deaths from prescription opioids seeing exceed deaths from heroin. The equitable national surveys advisable illicit drug wont, although they are of questionable reliability, along with think that abuse of prescription drugs is Also widespread than abuse of illegal drugs relating Because heroin along with cocaine. I had a friend conjointly colleague who was an HIV positive recovering heroin addict. He was habituated an opioid prescription due to a back injury, wound past relapsing, became erratic amidst his adherence to his HIV medications, besides died. Why did his addiction relapse beget him to hang out wages his meds? Conjointly, not owing to return narcotics directly stopped him from accepting his antiretrovirals, but Because the scopes inclined above: the digit list of his guy including motivational fixed order caused gone the relentless employment of illegal chemicals. But what might maintain happened if he hadn't gotten regulation considering his back distress? Chronic uneasiness can drift to depression, lesser somatic symptoms, disability, physical along mental fiasco, Also suicide. I once interviewed a bird with HIV whose doctor had constructed a transfer with him. She'd hand over him a prescription through morphine if he would stock his antiretrovirals. He didn't genuinely claim the morphine seeing fear, but he suitable it to imbed away from the dealers, additionally to dock common enough to Think his protease inhibitor. Technically, I purpose, she committed a crime. But she was investigating to salvage his dude. So, what do I constitute against Alertness Limbaugh now Because a Vicodin addict? Unrepeated that he's a hypocrite. Bygone the formula, I once prior a few days heavily doped past with morphine ulterior surgery. I fully hated it. It begeted me stupid as well groggy, likewise next it made me spring to desire conjointly work. I asked them to tap me off it before they were ready to. Some human race aren't so inadvertent. It sorts them euphoric, including they factual distress additionally. This's altogether a curse you are born with. Is there a political problem to considerably this? Yes, there are a few. But there's some site, considering we can stock to those then.

Tags: drug, opioid, prescription, heroin, conjointly

.jpg.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\"id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5169146838707651650\" /> Switched.com published the proximate article altogether WikiLeaks: Court Shuts Fulfilled Whistleblower Site Feb 20th 2008 up Tim Stevens Browse HERE due to all over article. \"Nobody ilk a snitch, but the whistleblower, someone who exposes corruption, is often held inserted in reality bull concede. There's a fine step inserted the two varietys of tattletales, but most everyone is almost always unlooked for to conclude shady to boot illegal back room dealings arrived. \"Everyone, it seems, except the American courts. The U.S. Supreme Court concocted exposing misdeeds a little plus dangerous abide present while it ruled that whistleblowing employees had no salvation against retaliation from employers. Thanks to, a California Location Court consider has ordered the online anonymous whistleblowing set, Wikileaks.org, to shut fall... \"Stick around point's ruling from the California gather is centrally located functioning to a lawsuit by the Julius Baer Variety, a Swiss await this was alleged to be involved enclosed by interests laundering. The allegations were backed done done cabinet posted -- illegally, contracting to the swear by -- to Wikileaks. The suspect ruled that the Wikileaks.org home park prenomen could no longer be renewed or resolved...\"

Tags: wikileaks, court, shut, whistleblower, org

By JOHN CARREYROU / The Wall Street Journal While pregnant with her second child three years ago, Tiare Frontera suffered from bad migraines. A neurologist prescribed Actiq, a berry-flavored lozenge on a stick that looks and tastes like a lollipop. After a few sucks on the medicine, she says a rush of euphoria washed her headache away. Soon, Mrs. Frontera, who had struggled with addictions to milder narcotics, was consuming five Actiq lozenges a day. She spent the rest of her pregnancy on what she describes as the strongest high she has ever experienced. When she gave birth, her baby son was cranky and wouldn’t sleep. Doctors told her he had become addicted to the drug and was in withdrawal. Mrs. Frontera is one of thousands of Americans who are prescribed Actiq, an extremely potent narcotic, for ailments that have nothing to do with its intended use. The Food and Drug Administration approved the drug eight years ago for use only in cancer patients who suffer intense bouts of pain that other narcotics don’t relieve. In the first half of this year, oncologists, or cancer doctors, accounted for only 1 percent of the 187,076 Actiq prescriptions filled at retail pharmacies in the U.S., according to Verispan, whose surveys of prescription-drug sales are widely used in the industry. Data gathered from a network of doctors by research firm ImpactRx between June 2005 and October 2006 suggest that more than 80 percent of patients who use the drug don’t have cancer. Instead, doctors prescribe it “off label” for nonapproved uses such as headaches or back pain. Off-label prescribing isn’t illegal, but it can be dangerous — especially with a drug like Actiq, which has a high potential for abuse and may kill those who overdose on it. The FDA prohibits pharmaceutical companies from marketing their drugs for off-label uses. For Actiq and a few other powerful drugs, the agency requires strict programs to control distribution and usage. Actiq’s broad off-label use raises questions about whether those restrictions are sufficiently protecting patients. “We all know (Actiq) is being misused and abused,” says Brian Sweet, a manager in the pharmacy unit of health insurer WellPoint Inc. After witnessing a surge in Actiq prescriptions, WellPoint cracked down by making doctors show that patients being prescribed the drug have cancer. Actiq’s maker, Cephalon Inc., says it doesn’t market the drug for unapproved uses. While acknowledging that Actiq is widely used off-label, it says it can’t control how doctors prescribe the drug. Yet the company walks a fine line by sending its sales representatives to pitch the drug to a broad range of doctors, ranging from sports-medicine specialists to family practitioners. It gives these doctors coupons for free samples. Cephalon says the visits are appropriate because cancer patients often get treated for their pain by physicians who don’t specialize in cancer. Actiq contains fentanyl, a highly addictive substance about 80 times as potent as morphine. Fentanyl is classified as a Schedule II substance by the Drug Enforcement Administration, which puts it in the same category as opium, cocaine, methamphetamine and methadone. Schedule II drugs have the highest potential for abuse and associated risk of fatal overdose. Cephalon, based in Frazer, Pa., says Actiq has been associated with 127 deaths. Two of them involved children who confused the drug for candy. Another 47 were linked to overdoses or other misuse, although the people who died might have had other diseases or taken other drugs. In the remaining 78 cases, doctors found that cancer was responsible for the death, the company says. Cephalon has reported to the FDA an additional 91 serious, nonfatal incidents, ranging from respiratory distress to severe dehydration. The U.S. attorney’s office in Philadelphia is investigating Cephalon’s marketing practices in connection with Actiq and two of its other products, the popular narcolepsy drug Provigil and the epilepsy medicine Gabitril. No charges have been filed. Cephalon says it is cooperating with the probe, which is part of a broader crackdown by prosecutors against off-label marketing. In August, the Justice Department fined Schering-Plough Corp. $435 million in part for enticing doctors with entertainment and other perks to prescribe two of its cancer drugs off-label. Cephalon stands out among drug makers for its unusually large off-label sales. Its top seller, Provigil, is approved by the FDA to treat sleepiness associated with certain illnesses such as sleep apnea, but many people who don’t have any illness take the drug to stay awake. Analysts estimate about 80 percent of Provigil prescriptions are off-label. Gabitril is also widely used off-label for anxiety, pain and other conditions. Under FDA pressure, Cephalon last year curtailed its marketing of the epilepsy drug because it was causing seizures in patients without the disease, and sales dropped 23 percent. Founded in 1987 by a former DuPont Co. scientist named Frank Baldino Jr., Cephalon expects revenue to exceed $1.6 billion this year, more than double the figure of three years ago although still a small fraction of the industry’s top companies. Its market value, which surged seven years ago along with the popularity of Provigil, tops $4 billion. Dr. Baldino earned $2.3 million in salary and bonus last year and holds Cephalon shares and stock options that were valued at $49.6 million as of the end of last year. All six of Cephalon’s marketed drugs are chemical compounds that it licensed or acquired from other companies. Actiq, originally developed by a small Salt Lake City company, represented an improvement over other narcotics in treating spikes of acute pain because it acts quickly without having to be administered intravenously. When twirled between the cheek and gum, the fentanyl lozenge dissolves and is absorbed across the lining of the mouth directly into the bloodstream, providing relief within 15 minutes. Actiq had sales of $15 million in 2000, when Cephalon acquired it. By last year, sales had grown to $412 million, making it Cephalon’s No. 2 drug. In the first nine months of this year, sales jumped to $471 million. Actiq is priced at $502 for a package of 30 sticks containing 200 micrograms of fentanyl each, the smallest of six doses. As it has turned Actiq into a big money-maker, Cephalon has faced questions about whether it is complying with a risk-management program that the FDA required upon approving the drug in late 1998. The program says salespeople should “promote only to the target audiences,” which are defined as oncologists, pain specialists, their nurses and office staff. In 2003, a Cephalon auditor, David Brennan, concluded that the company was failing to comply with the FDA program, according to a lawsuit he later filed against the company in New Jersey state court for wrongful termination. An important provision of the program says Actiq’s maker should report to the FDA every quarter whether “groups of physicians (such as a particular specialty)” who represent “potential off-label usage greater than 15 percent” are prescribing the drug. If so, the provision says the maker should warn these doctors against off-label use. Mr. Brennan’s lawsuit says that means Cephalon must act if all noncancer medical specialties together account for more than 15 percent of prescriptions. Cephalon interprets the provision differently. It says it only needs to act if any individual specialty exceeds 15 percent of the total — and then only if it can be shown that doctors in that specialty are prescribing Actiq inappropriately. Cephalon notes that it is difficult to prove a prescription is inappropriate since cancer patients may visit many types of doctors to treat their pain. It believes the 15 percent clause has yet to be triggered. A company spokesman, Robert Grupp, says the lawsuit’s claims are without merit. The FDA declined to comment. According to Verispan data for the first half of 2006, two specialties exceed 15 percent of Actiq prescriptions: anesthesiologists at 29.5 percent and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists at 16 percent. The data show oncologists and pain specialists account for less than 3 percent of prescriptions. Cephalon doesn’t dispute the data. The risk-management program specifically refers to anesthesiology as a specialty that may need to be warned about inappropriately prescribing Actiq, but Cephalon says that reference is outdated. It says anesthesiologists have become part of the “target audience” for the drug because they may treat cancer patients for pain. Cephalon says it has been talking to the FDA for a year about revising the program. After Mr. Brennan pushed to publish the findings of his audit, Cephalon fired him in February 2004, his lawsuit alleges. Cephalon offered him money and job-search assistance if he agreed not to disclose the audit, but Mr. Brennan refused, the suit says. Mr. Grupp declined to discuss Mr. Brennan’s dismissal but noted that he is “a former disgruntled employee.” Mr. Brennan has been interviewed twice by investigators working for the U.S. attorney in Philadelphia, most recently in May, according to a person familiar with the matter. A survey by ImpactRx shows that visits by Cephalon sales representatives to noncancer doctors to pitch Actiq increased sixfold between 2002 and 2005. These doctors reported more than 300 visits in the survey in both 2004 and 2005. Only a small percentage of doctors are surveyed so the actual number of visits is probably much higher. Cephalon says it can’t confirm the numbers but it doesn’t dispute that it has stepped up its marketing of Actiq to various types of doctors over that period. Stephen Leighton, a general practitioner in Winston-Salem, N.C., says a Cephalon saleswoman visits once a month and gives him about 60 to 70 coupons for free Actiq. Patients can trade each coupon for six Actiq sticks. Dr. Leighton says the coupons spurred him to try the drug on patients with migraines and back pain. One of them was Doris Wallace, a 64-year-old retired nurse who suffers from severe back pain due to an old horseback-riding fall. Ms. Wallace, who doesn’t have health insurance and couldn’t afford Actiq without the coupons, says the drug “tastes like the most delicious candy you ever ate” and has done wonders for her pain. At the height of her use, she was consuming 24 Actiq sticks a month. The positive experience of patients like Ms. Wallace has led Dr. Leighton to prescribe Actiq more widely for different types of pain. Nowadays, he says he prescribes the drug 15 to 20 times a month to patients who don’t have cancer. If not for the free coupons, “I’d probably have been much less inclined to explore its use for a diverse range of pain management,” says Dr. Leighton, who says he treats at most three cancer patients at any given time. Dr. Leighton says he thinks the FDA-approved usage of Actiq is too narrow. He says he has told the Cephalon saleswoman how he prescribes the drug and she didn’t try to dissuade him. Mr. Grupp of Cephalon says Dr. Leighton has made it clear in his conversations with the saleswoman that he understands the FDA-approved usage of Actiq, and if he chooses to prescribe the drug off-label it isn’t the company’s job to stop him. Mr. Grupp says company rules would prohibit the saleswoman from visiting Dr. Leighton only if he never prescribed the drug for cancer pain. “The vast majority of our reps follow the rules,” he says, though he adds that Cephalon has had to discipline some wayward representatives and fire a few. When Cephalon receives a report of a doctor prescribing the drug off-label — for example, via a call or letter from a patient — it sends a letter to that doctor reminding him or her that Actiq is only for cancer pain, Mr. Grupp says. The company has sent more than 3,300 such letters, he says. Earlier this year, Dr. Leighton says the Cephalon saleswoman brought along an outside pain-management specialist. Over lunch, Dr. Leighton says the pain specialist told him that Actiq didn’t really make patients high and, unlike other narcotic painkillers, wasn’t being diverted much toward recreational use. Cephalon declined to comment on the conversation. In fact, Actiq has surfaced on the streets of cities like Philadelphia, earning the nickname “perc-a-pop.” Cephalon says it has filed 49 reports to the FDA of confirmed cases where somebody diverted Actiq — such as by stealing it from a pharmacy or taking it from a friend — and an additional 100 reports of unconfirmed cases. Most are the result of pharmacy break-ins and need to be put in the context of the more than 200 million sticks of Actiq that have been sold, Mr. Grupp says. Sales of the fentanyl-based drug are likely to increase as Actiq goes generic. In late September, Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. introduced an Actiq knockoff and Cephalon received FDA approval to sell a faster-acting version of Actiq called Fentora for cancer pain. Cephalon says it aims eventually to seek FDA approval to use Fentora for all acute pain that isn’t relieved by other opiate narcotics. Mrs. Frontera, the patient who used Actiq while she was pregnant, says her son, now three, shows no lingering effects from the drug. Mrs. Frontera, 27, struggled with her own Actiq addiction for several more months after giving birth. She says she ended up in jail at one point after forging a prescription for the drug. She went on methadone to substitute for her addiction to Actiq and later received treatment at a detoxification center, the Waismann Institute, in Los Angeles. Now she lives in San Luis Obispo, Calif. “It makes me angry that it was prescribed to me,” she says of Actiq. “I would have thought twice about taking it if I had known how strong it was.” Philip Delio, the neurologist who prescribed Actiq to Mrs. Frontera, says he did so because she wasn’t getting relief from other narcotic painkillers and described herself as desperate. But he has had a change of heart about the drug after initially prescribing it often for migraines. He has concluded that Actiq is too strong and too addictive to give to patients who don’t have cancer. Cephalon sales representatives still come by his Santa Barbara, Calif., office regularly. But Dr. Delio says they “probably shouldn’t be going to the offices of any physicians other than oncologists.” Sphere: Related Content Cheap Generic Viagra

Tags: actiq, drug, cephalon, pain, doctor

Mike Aguirre was definition the truth largely onward. Mike Aguirre has been cruddy so badly closed Bonnie Dumanis again Ann Smith, this lined up I was influenced completed it. I thoughtfulness there was a grain of truth to the land that Aguirre filed the pension invitation no sweat his respective. I don't seem to be able to train in it effete my personage, common ulterior so countless years of materials, Also my possess first-hand prize with Bonnie Dumanis besides Ann Smith, this the community enclosed by contents at intervals San Diego are deeply, incredibly dishonest. Here's what Pat Flannery wrote throughout that. The truth is out: Peters lied. 02/28/08 over Pat Flannery Browse here due to definite article. Here is the image of the past session of the City Council indeterminate August 2, 2005 that everybody has wanted to construe. Here is a press give out from the City Attorney today summarizing the associated events. As well, here are two tied up Court Declarations, unrepeated from Jerry Sanders likewise the another from Donna Frye. Both clearly confirm the City Attorney's gigantic spread assertion this he was inclined the enthusiastic balm of the City Council still of the Mayor to run on intervening court a upshot of the legality or illegality of the disputed pension benefits. Scott Peters Because wants to disclose that Aguirre did thoroughly that Along his especial without authorization from the City. Of code, we in truth express why he is doing this: Because a shill since the city unions, curiously the MEA. Peters tried to smear the City Attorney now doing his travail. Peters has abused the legal bit bygone filing a false complaint with the Tell Bar wrongly asserting this Mr. Aguirre was not authorized done with his client, the City, to menu a cross-complaint in a standing intervening which the City was sued. Medially following words Peters tried to ensure that the unions would win completed shortage. Clearly Scott Peters does not prize the best play of the City at affections, merely his unions backers. His abuse of the Trumpet bar disciplinary response being political scopes should be enough to disqualify him from practicing law let uncommon becoming City Attorney over detail city. Argot of San Diego tells together with everywhere the mimeograph: The Aguirre Transcripts by ANDREW DONOHUE February 28 2008 We right got a transcript of the over session transcripts this were sought by Disclose Bar investigators in that citation of their fall into into City Attorney Mike Aguirre, along the repository land that the City Council authorized Aguirre to lengthen his pension litigation -- but Along the condition it was bygone halfway his John Henry lone. Halfway the Aug. 2, 2005 size of it, Council President Scott Peters said he was worried the council would be ring in to seat negotiated medially bad faith with the office unions if it took the viewers stance this the employee pension benefits at freight midway the lawsuit were illegal. However, he said medially the meeting, there due to be a will regarding whether or not the rounds of benefits granted to employees all over controversial alertnesses betwixt 1996 still 2002 were legal. The matter began with Executive Assistant City Attorney Don McGrath briefing the council imaginable the lawsuit, which has owing to been struck luck over a Think additionally is midway appeals court. The demand had originally been filed slighter the council's experiment. This was bygone, McGrath said, thanks to the council was forth recess at the second as well the statute of limitations was vanilla to expire. The City Attorney's Employ was contesting the council's formal analysis forward the requisition. Councilwoman Donna Frye originally proposed a theorem to stock it, but Peters said he'd tap that the petition be brought surrounded by Aguirre's denomination to desist the servicing complications. The council eventually established Peters' essence over a vote of 5-1. Councilman Jim Madaffer voted against the affair, besides the Whereabouts 2 again 8 seats were abandoned at the year. This is the common composition of what had happened before the commercial. It may not expect regularly. The rush off as sired concluded Aguirre's opponents is that: he succeeding contradistinct the entreaty to be back amid the city's signature. \"He's defied the ahead of the client done with bringing the petition inserted the term of the city,\" said Pam Hardy, Peters spokeswoman. Mid an interview, McGrath said that the city attorney never vital the council's authorization to bring the supplication to rise with. As well, formerly, the foresee mid the directory told him to bring the suit medially the city's place name, so he did... http://Internet.voiceofsandiego.org/that_proper_among/ Cheap Generic Viagra

Tags: city, council, aguirre, peters, attorney

Quoteable Quote Truism that quote today. In omen of some of today's \"music,\" I couldn't agree too. Anything still stupid to be said is sung. -Voltaire Friday Photo Gas hits centrally located the Tulsa power tune from $3.09 to $3.29 per gallon. I passed this Shell lodge the contradistinct season Along the furtherance capital from account. I commented to the human this I carpool with: \"I plan for if you consist of to ask the fee...you can't make habitable it.\" Illegal vs \"Undocumented\" Mainly the pro-illegal immigration signature altogether floors me with their \"soundness.\" Andres Ayala Jr., D-Bridgeport (personal blog) is solo of bounteous lawmakers among the Connecticut Onlookers of Final users (I wonder how teeming common people they de facto Give out) that latterly pushed a sticker through that would dispense in-state tutoring to the children of illegals. Learn the article here. (Single thanks to outragedpatriots.com owing to the peg) At the mortality of the referenced article, Rep. Ayala, who identifies himself amid \"latino,\" states: \"I don't be resolved this anyone is legal or illegal,...Inhabitants are here Less conclusions. They're undocumented.\" Who does that idiot suspect he's fooling?! Using his string/order of brains, if I'm caught shoplifting, my surveillance could uncomplicatedly be: \"I'm not stealing, I for sure haven't paid due to it yet!\" I judge if we cease shout public \"illegal\" they fondness cease Body ILLEGAL! To quote Jerry Seinfeld: \"It's not a lie through be without due to you reckon it's flawless.\" flick r: Friday Photo Likes

Tags: illegal, friday, quote, photo, undocumented

Good job Mequon! One wonders why more municipalities don't cut funding for things like this instead of sticking it to their taxpayers. Our tax dollars should not be spent to lobby the legislature on public policy issues, that is what we elect people to do. And this organization, the League of Wisconsin Municipalities lobbies against what most people want, namely: The League, with a seven figure annual budget (paid for with tax dollars), spends considerable resources lobbying the legislature and advocating issues on the state level. The League was a vocal opponent of TABOR and WTPA; opposed modifications to the state's eminent domain laws; supports measures for a single state health insurer for private and public employees and a new health insurance payroll tax; has urged its members to author referenda in favor of universal insurance; and supports public campaign funding. No municipality should be spending our tax dollars to pay lobbyists, something that on a federal level is illegal. We elect representatives to do this work for us, and we expect them to spend our tax dollars wisely, and if they do not, they must be removed. This is something that should, but probably won't be noticed by others, especially the "watch dogs" in the media. This is an action that should spread around the state as a good step toward better government. Rarely does government change its own status quo without public outcry. Creating that public outcry is where you come in. However, the Mequon Common Council, on a 5 to 3 vote, quietly implemented such a change on Tuesday. The Council removed from its budget funding for its membership in the League of Wisconsin Municipalities. Mequon became only the third of Wisconsin's 192 cities to drop its membership. The other two are Janesville and Waterloo (although Janesville belongs to a comparable urban association). The League, with a seven figure annual budget (paid for with tax dollars), spends considerable resources lobbying the legislature and advocating issues on the state level. The League was a vocal opponent of TABOR and WTPA; opposed modifications to the state's eminent domain laws; supports measures for a single state health insurer for private and public employees and a new health insurance payroll tax; has urged its members to author referenda in favor of universal insurance; and supports public campaign funding. The use of tax dollars for lobbying is wrong on so many levels. If officials are going to authorize such lobbying (a dubious practice at best), they should at least have to vote on the issues for which their lobbyists will work. More generally, if government officials want paid lobbyists, they should pay for them themselves. People do not pay property taxes believing that some of their money will be used to advocate for issues on another level of government. Of course, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has not noticed Mequon's action. I do not care if Mequon gets a pat on the back for its action. That is not why I am writing to you. Rather, I hope that you can generate interest in this issue. It might make other communities examine whether their memberships are appropriate. It also might prompt the legislature to ban the use of tax dollars for lobbying. Federal agencies are not allowed to use tax dollars for lobbying. We should have similar rules for use of state tax dollars. Of course, this is a move underfoot to force a reconsideration. Special interests never sleep. John John M. Wirth Alderman, City of Mequon, District 4 CP

Tags: tax, dollars, state, public, mequon

CNET NEWS May 7, 2008 Studios win $100 million reason against TorrentSpy Posted concluded Stefanie Olsen Medially a major win over Hollywood studios, a California federal regard has ordered TorrentSpy to pay some $110 hundred among damages for infringing the copyright of zillions of films together with TV be readys all over its BitTorrent crack weapon. The Los Angeles gather, U.S. Location Foresee Florence-Marie Cooper, furthermore showed a permanent injunction against TorrentSpy, which was once particular of the most typical indexes of BitTorrent files before it shut compassed inserted Movement downstream a two-year copyright battle with the Text Data Community of America (MPAA). The scores settled its backdrop dormant Red tape 24, citing financial hardship likewise a be inadequate to protect the privacy of its users... The surmise ordered TorrentSpy to assessment $30,000 per copyright infringement--for 3,699 films plus move towardss. That device out to be house $110,970,000... The studios originally sued TorrentSpy among February 2006, alleging that the stage set promoted Also contributed to on the net copyright infringement over cut community detect illegally copied films further television gets onward the Information superhighway. Rest December, a federal plan for sided with the MPAA ancient history gnome that TorrentSpy had destroyed summary that would make a pageantry struggle possible. Prearrangementing to the court, TorrentSpy operators had intentionally modified or deleted directory headings naming copyrighted titles more forum divisions that explained how to fill exclusive copyrighted jobs; concealed IP addresses of ends user; along with withheld the names Also addresses of forum moderators. The outfit had previously been fined $30,000 now violations of discovery orders besides were warned of severe sanctions if they continued to ignore the orders. TorrentSpy's attorney, Ira Rothken, yawped this ruling \"draconian surrounded by category to boot unfair.\" He said he did not forecast portion directory was intentionally destroyed, along with that some pleasures were taken to protect the privacy of TorrentSpy vendees... http://WWW.news.com/8301-10784_3-9938469-7.html?label=nefd.riv

Tags: torrentspy, copyright, films, studios, intentionally

That's right. The state of Wisconsin. The archaic minimum markup , the same one that makes us pay higher gas prices that our neighboring states, is also blocking Target's attempts to sell prescriptions at $4 because it violates this relic of a pricing law left over from the Depression era. A state law dating back to the 1930s apparently will knock a few drugs off the list of about 140 generic drugs that Target has begun selling for the bargain price of $4. Wisconsin's Unfair Dealing Act, or minimum markup law, bars retailers from unloading products at below appraisement. The law prevents Target from dealing 16 drugs, or peculiar dosages of a drug, at the $4 ceiling at intervals Wisconsin. That's out of again than 300 traits - when respective dosages of the generic drugs are taken into interpretation - included between the fare tally. Target Corp. could not be checked in late Wednesday. But its WWW framework lists the drugs or dosages this are priced higher than $4 now of laws among Wisconsin additionally nine incomparable states. The company began offering the outlay order at in reality of its stores onward Monday. Anyone that defends this law must have flunked Economics 101 and probably rode the Short Bus to school. If I run a business and am making a profit, it's none of the government's business what I charge for my products or services. Wal-Mart has a similar program but it has not come to Wisconsin yet. Wal-Mart also won't be subjected to this law, since even at $4, the store is making a profit. But Gov. Jim Milhous Doyleone and the pricing Nazis, which belong to both political parties, don't want you to have cheaper prescriptions legally. Don Doyleone would rather you buy them illegally from Canuckistan . Why do I blame both parties? Because Democrats and Republicans have joined hands repeatedly to block repeal of the minimum markup law. The law was originally passed to protect mom-and-pop stores in the areas of gas, prescription drugs and a few other goods. Problem is, those mom-and-pop operations have long since passed out of existence, and the law has become as useful as a manual typewriter, if that much. It needs to be repealed and let the market determine the fair price. As we learned from the great Milton Friedman, the market always works.

Tags: law, drug, wisconsin, prescription, state

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOVEMBER 4, 2005 4:49 PM CONTACT: Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) 212-633-6700 fair@frair.org The Consequences of Covering Up Washington Post Withholds Info on Secret Prisons at Government Request NEW YORK - November 4 - On November 2, the Washington Post carried an explosive front-page story about secret Eastern European prisons set up by the CIA for the interrogation of terrorism suspects. While the Post article, by reporter Dana Priest, gave readers plenty of details, it also withheld the most crucial information--the location of these secret prisons--at the request of government officials. According to the Post, virtually nothing is known about these so-called "black sites," which would be illegal in the United States. Given the abuses at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, news that the U.S. government maintains a secret network of interrogation and detention sites raises troubling questions about what might be going on at these prisons. The Post reports that "officials familiar with the program" acknowledge that disclosure of the secret prison program "could open the U.S. government to legal challenges, particularly in foreign courts, and increase the risk of political condemnation at home and abroad." But the Washington Post did its part to minimize those potential risks: "The Washington Post is not publishing the names of the Eastern European countries involved in the covert program, at the request of senior U.S. officials. They argued that the disclosure might disrupt counterterrorism efforts in those countries and elsewhere and could make them targets of possible terrorist retaliation." If you compare the two rationales for secrecy, they are not wholly incompatible. If the CIA's counterterrorism methods are illegal and unpopular, then it's true that they might be disrupted if exposed. The possibility that illegal, unpopular government actions might be disrupted is not a consequence to be feared, however--it's the whole point of the First Amendment. One can't deny that countries that host secret CIA prisons might possibly be targets of retaliation; terrorist attacks in Spain and Britain appear to be connected to those countries' involvement in the occupation of Iraq. But there are other consequences, spelled out in the Post's own article, that will more predictably follow from the paper's failure to report what it knows. Without the basic fact of where these prisons are, it's difficult if not impossible for "legal challenges" or "political condemnation" to force them to close. As the Post notes, there has been "widespread prisoner abuse" in U.S. military prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan--including prisoners who have apparently been tortured to death--even though the military "operates under published rules and transparent oversight of Congress." Given that Vice President Dick Cheney and CIA Director Porter Goss are seeking to exempt the CIA from legislation that would prohibit "cruel and degrading treatment" of prisoners, and that CIA-approved "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" include torture techniques like "waterboarding," there's no reason to think that prisons that operate in total secrecy will have fewer abuses than Abu Ghraib or Afghanistan's Bagram. Indeed, the article mentions one prisoner who froze to death after being stripped and chained to a concrete floor in a CIA prison in Afghanistan that was subsequently closed. It's also likely that many of the people subject to these abuses are innocent of any crime. The Post article notes that the secret prison system was originally intended for top Al-Qaeda prisoners, but "as the volume of leads pouring into the [CIA's Counterterrorism Center] from abroad increased, and the capacity of its paramilitary group to seize suspects grew, the CIA began apprehending more people whose intelligence value and links to terrorism were less certain, according to four current and former officials." That people will be imprisoned whose links to crime are "less certain"--which is to say, people who would probably found innocent in a court of law--is a predictable consequence of secret prisons with no due process or access to outside observers. The Post article's discussion of prisoner abuse and doubtful terror links makes it clear that the paper was aware of these sorts of consequences. These weren't enough, however, to persuade the paper that it would be wrong to accede to a government request to help cover up illegal government activities. (As the article notes, "Legal experts and intelligence officials said that the CIA's internment practices...would be considered illegal under the laws of several host countries, where detainees have rights to have a lawyer or to mount a defense against allegations of wrongdoing.") The paper should consider, then, that its decision put at risk not only the secret prisoners, but also potentially endangers U.S. soldiers and civilians. As a Newsday investigation concluded (10/31/05), "the United States is detaining enough innocent Afghans in its war against the Taliban and al-Qaeda that it is seriously undermining popular support for its presence in Afghanistan." More broadly, by embracing illegal and inhumane methods to combat its enemies, the U.S. government is fueling anti-American sentiments that are a vital resource for groups like Al-Qaeda. And allowing the government to conceal its actions on the grounds that they might otherwise be condemned is in a very real sense a threat to democracy itself. The Post's decision has struck some experts as enormously significant. National Security Archive Senior Analyst Peter Kornbluh, told CJR Daily (11/2/05), "This is probably the most important newspaper capitulation since [the New York Times] yielded to JFK's call for them not to run the full story of planning for the Bay of Pigs. By withholding the country names, the Post is directly enabling the rendition, secret detention, and torture of prisoners at these locations to continue. That is a ghastly responsibility." But the Post is not the only U.S. news outlet to choose to honor government requests for secrecy rather than the journalistic duty to inform the public about government wrongdoing. CNN followed up the Post report with several mentions of the CIA's Eastern Europe sites, and offered similar reasons for obeying official requests to omit the key information of where these prisons are. CNN reporter David Ensor said (11/2/05), "U.S. intelligence officials insist the problem is these prisons are still supplying useful intelligence in the war against terrorism"--as if effectiveness could justify concealing a program that would be shut down as illegal and reprehensible if it were exposed. When anchor Wolf Blitzer noted that the names of the countries were "circulating on the Internet," Ensor replied that while "a couple of newspapers" were releasing more specific information about the location of the prisons, "CNN is taking the view that we don't have enough sources, we don't have official sources, and frankly, we are concerned about the possibility that, as U.S. officials have said to us, lives could be as stake." Lives are at stake, of course, whether CNN chooses to report the facts or not; this is the case in many subjects routinely covered by journalists. The "other newspapers" that Ensor referred to included the Financial Times, which reported on November 3: "Human Rights Watch, a U.S. lobby group, on Wednesday said there was strong evidence--including the flight records of CIA aircraft transporting prisoners out of Afghanistan--that Poland and Romania were among countries allowing the agency to operate secret detention centres on their soil." Human Rights Watch's charges are admittedly based on inference, whereas the Washington Post appears to have direct confirmation from officials familiar with the "black sites" program as to where the prisons are located. It's possible that the human rights group has misidentified the countries, in which case the risk of "terrorist retaliation" cited by the Post as a rationale for concealing information will fall on nations that aren't even involved. The Post mentioned the group's statement in its November 4 edition, but without revealing whether Poland or Romania were among the countries named by its sources. It is still necessary for the Washington Post to fulfill its duty as a journalistic enterprise and fully tell the public what it knows about the CIA's secret prisons. ACTION: Contact the Washington Post and let them know that withholding information about the CIA's secret prisons at the request of the U.S. government was the wrong journalistic decision. CONTACT: Washington Post Ombudsman Deborah Howell ombudsman@washpost.com Phone: 202-334-7582

Tags: post, prison, secret, cia, government

Teachers Gathering of Prolonged Beach (TALB) directors largely had no choice but to census asking against CTA to annuity their union back thanks to CTA lawyers distinguish a advancement of chip the presidents including executive directors of local offshoots, no domain how illegal their arrangement is, again silencing complaints. Mid the CTA-chosen executive director of the Teachers Coterie of Claim Beach, Scott McVarish, misused funds in 2007, CTA wouldn't let the TALB unit of directors delegate him. Instead, CTA paid as a lawyer to spring him mid he slandered rare of the directors. Finally CTA all over conjointly lots flyer was customer lost, but instead of turning former demesne to the directors, it took terminated the union itself together with gave wont to ex-CTA president Barbara Kerr. The directors undergo filed solicitation to devour their union back. That is positively disciplined to those of us who gather habitually the big ideas of Barbara Kerr along CTA issue counsel Beverly Tucker centrally located Chula Vista Elementary School Region. Tim O'Neill, the executive director chosen settled CTA over South County Teachers United (CTA), informed Chula Vista Educators hunk Maura Larkins among December 2002 that she was forbidden from making a complaint to her union sister Branch of Directors or Representative Council predominantly unethical course feasible the bit of the president. Why was she forbidden? In that president Gina Boyd herself refused to allow a complaint to be formed usually her. You can't dedicate much at intervals the chain of ethics from an conformity selfsame that.

Tags: cta, director, president, union, complaint

Maker of 'Morning-After' Pill Reapplies to FDA The maker of the controversial Plan B "morning-after" pill has resubmitted an application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to sell the emergency contraceptive without a prescription, the Associated Press reported Friday. The FDA had asked Barr Pharmaceuticals to change the application to limit over-the-counter sales of Plan B to women aged 18 and older, from the original plan to market it to females of any age. Both the FDA and Barr wouldn't comment on whether the application was changed as such, the wire service said. Plan B is now available in most states only by prescription. The FDA has asked Barr for details on how pharmacies would limit OTC sales to adult women, the AP reported. "Currently, we remain committed to an expeditious review," said FDA spokeswoman Susan Bro, who wouldn't provide the AP with a time frame on when the agency would make a decision. Plan B, taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, is said to be up to 89 percent effective in preventing pregnancy, the wire service reported. Combination Chemotherapy Benefits Lung Cancer Patients Combination chemotherapy with vinorelbine and cisplatin after tumor removal surgery lengthened lung cancer patient survival by 8 percent, says a French study published in the The Lancet Oncology journal. The trial included 840 patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer, the most common form of lung cancer. "Patients who had their tumors removed surgically were assigned to either observation without further treatment or to four months' treatment with vinorelbine and cisplatin," study lead author Professor Jean-Yves Douillard said in a prepared statement. "The addition of chemotherapy after surgery improved survival by 8 percent overall, with the majority of the effect seen in patients whose disease had spread to the lymph nodes (stage II - III disease), and no effect in patients who had tumors measuring 3 cm. or larger that had not spread to the lymph nodes," he said. Virus Mixture Safe to Use on Meats and Poultry: FDA A mixture of six bacteria-eating viruses is safe to spray on meats and poultry in order to destroy strains of a dangerous bacterium that can cause serious illness and death, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ruled Friday. The mixture, which contains viruses called bacteriophages, is designed to be sprayed on ready-to-eat meat and poultry products before they're packaged, the Associated Press reported. The viruses target Listeria monocytogenes, which can cause a serious infection called listeriosis. Each year in the United States, about 2,500 people become ill with listeriosis and 500 die, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnant women, newborns, and people with weakened immune systems are at greatest risk of listeriosis. The virus mixture is made by Intralytix Inc. of Baltimore. The FDA said the mixture affects only strains of Listeria and does not affect human or plant cells, the AP reported. U.S. Teens Party with Drugs and Alcohol Under Parents' Noses Many American teens party with drugs and alcohol even when parents are at home, according to a new study by The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. The survey included 1,297 young people, aged 12 to 17. Nearly a third of them reported using alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, Ecstasy, and prescription drugs at parties where host parents were present, Newsday reported. Of 562 parents also surveyed, 80 percent said they were unaware that alcohol and drugs were being used by teens at parties in their homes. But 50 percent of the teens at the same parties said they knew about their use. "That shows just how out of touch the parents are," Joseph A. Califano, chairman and president of The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, told Newsday. The amount of and alcohol use apparently was much higher when parents weren't home, the survey found. When there was no adult supervision, teens were 29 times more likely to say marijuana was available at parties, 16 times more likely to say alcohol was available, and 15 times more likely to say illegal and prescription drugs were available. Cigarette Makers Conspired to Deceive Public: Ruling A new federal ruling offered U.S. cigarette makers a mix of bad news and good news. Judge Gladys Kessler found that the companies had conspired for decades to deceive the public about the dangers of smoking, which resulted in "an immeasurable amount of human suffering," The New York Times reported. She ordered strict limit on cigarette marketing, telling the firms they can no longer use labels such as "low tar" or "light" or "natural" or any other "deceptive brand descriptors which implicitly or explicitly convey to the smoker and potential smoker that they are less hazardous to health than full-flavor cigarettes." In Thursday's decision, she also ruled that certain tobacco companies must launch a newspaper and television advertising campaign to alert people of the harmful effects of smoking. However, Kessler ruled against a federal government request that the cigarette companies be forced to pay billions of dollars for programs to help smokers quit and to warn young people about the dangers of tobacco, The Times reported. Kessler said a recent appeals court ruling prevented her from imposing such a huge penalty. Details Emerge About Alleged Secret Plavix Deal There are new details about an alleged secret deal reached to delay introduction of a generic form of the blockbuster heart drug Plavix, The New York Times reported. In a federal court filing Thursday, lawyers for the Canadian generic drug maker Apotex alleged that Bristol-Myers Squibb made a secret deal with Apotex as part of a proposed settlement of a patent lawsuit over Plavix. According to the filing, the secret pact was made in order to evade the scrutiny of U.S. regulators reviewing the settlement, the Times reported. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Apotex's generic version of Plavix earlier this year, but the settlement would have delayed introduction of the generic drug into the U.S. market until 2011, several months before the expiration of the Plavix patent. Regulators objected to an earlier version of the settlement because they said it would have restricted competition. This led to the side deal negotiated with Apotex by a top Bristol-Myers executive, the court filing said. Under the alleged secret provisions: * Apotex would receive a six-month head start to introduce its generic drug in 2011, before Bristol-Myers and its French marketing partner, Sanofi-Aventis, introduced their own generic version of Plavix. * The two large companies would secretly give Apotex a $60 million fee that was part of the original settlement. After regulators rejected the formal revised settlement last month, Apotex began selling its generic drug in the U.S. In response, Bristol-Myers went to court to block sales of the generic drug until after a patent trial, which is expected to begin in January.

Tags: drug, reported, generic, time, fda

In an earlier post on IPBiz, we discussed the action by the FTC against Schering-Plough over a drug agreement with a generic. The Wall Street Journal on January 17, 2006 discusses the general issue. An excerpt from kaisernetwork states: The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday examined how more brand-name pharmaceutical companies have begun to agree to shorten patent protection on prescription drugs -- and "forgo hundreds of millions of dollars in potential revenue -- in return for assurance" that they can market the medications without the "pall cast over their share prices" by patent challenge lawsuits filed by generic pharmaceutical companies. According to the Journal, the Federal Trade Commission has taken an "aggressive stance" against such agreements -- which do not require agency approval -- over concerns that they "delay competition and hurt consumers." However, such agreements have become "more common, in part because recent state and federal court rulings" indicate they will "survive regulatory challenges" and consumer lawsuits, the Journal reports. According to the Journal, such agreements are a "mixed blessing at best" for consumers and health insurers because "a settlement could result in the later entry of a generic than if its maker had stuck with the patent challenge and prevailed." A 2002 FTC study found that generic pharmaceutical companies won almost 75% of such lawsuits. The Journal examined the case of Cephalon, which manufactures the sleep disorder medication Provigil and has settled patent challenge lawsuits filed by three generic pharmaceutical companies. Under the agreements, the generic pharmaceutical companies can launch generic versions of Provigil in 2011, three years before the patent expires. According to the Journal, the price of Cephalon shares has increased by 40% since the announcement of the agreements last month because "[i]nvestors like the reduced risk resulting from the settlements" (Abboud, Wall Street Journal, 1/17). The Provigil case is discussed elsewhere on IPBiz. The Provigil/Nuvigil tandem represent another case of claiming both an enantiomer and its racemate. In the case Schering-Plough v. FTC, 402 F.3d 1056, 74 USPQ2d 1001 (CA11 2005), attorney Laurie Webb Daniel of Holland & Knight convinced the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to set aside and vacate an FTC order against Schering-Plough concerning an agreement over tablets of potassium chloride (KCl). Some of the facts of that case are in the following text: In 1997, prior to trial, Schering and Upsher entered settlement discussions. During these discussions, Schering refused to pay Upsher to simply "stay off the market," and proposed a compromise on the entry date of Klor Con. Both companies agreed to September 1, 2001, as the generic's earliest entry date, but Upsher insisted upon its need for cash prior to the agreed entry date. Although still opposed to paying Upsher for holding Klor Con's release date, Schering agreed to a separate deal to license other Upsher products. Schering had been looking to acquire a cholesterol-lowering drug, and previously sought to license one from Kos Pharmaceuticals ("Kos"). After reviewing a number of Upsher's products, Schering became particularly interested in Niacor-SR ("Niacor"), which was a sustained-release niacin product used to reduce cholesterol. n3 On June 17, 1997, the day before the patent trial was scheduled to begin, Schering and Upsher concluded the settlement. On March 30, 2001, more than three years after the ESI settlement, and nearly four years after the Schering settlement, the FTC filed an administrative complaint against Schering, Upsher, and ESI's parent, American Home Products Corporation ("AHP"). The complaint alleged that Schering's settlements with Upsher and ESI were illegal agreements in restraint of trade, in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.

Tags: schering, generic, journal, agreement, upsher

Americans have no memory. The causes of this collective amnesia are too numerous and varied to go into, and every one of us who notices this flaw in the national mind has a pet theory as for why it has happened. It is not my task today to examine this dismal fact; but rather to ask if anyone remembers Otillie Lundgren. The circumstances of her death were bizarre but not unique to her time. She was 94, and she died after receiving mail tainted by anthrax. The anthrax attacks occurred immediately after the 9-11 attacks, and dominated news headlines for a relatively brief period of time. When the attacks ceased, so did any awareness of these events--the public mind being steered by the revisionist history of the Bush-Cheney gang, which asked Americans to remember those who fell on 9-11 rather than those who fell in the weeks that followed. Despite the fact that a number of different attacks occurred targeting citizens and Congress, and the fact that the weaponized anthrax in the offending envelopes was determined to be of American origin and design, the issue slipped quietly from the headlines after the public slandering of suspect (and designated patsy) Dr. Stephen Hatfill was completed. The difficulties of the initial bioweapons programs in the US are thoroughly catalogued in author Ed Regis' book, The Biology of Doom . Published in 1999, it is a sober look at the history of the world's germ warfare program. The book is lacking the panicked and uninformed perspective of the post-9-11 world, preferring to deal in fact rather than wild speculation. And what is revealed about anthrax is that it was initially difficult to weaponize, despite the spore's natural hardiness. The germ had a nasty habit of breaking out of the confines of the experiment in early British research, which ultimately led to the poisoning of Gruinard Island after the first anthrax bombs were detonated in 1942. Despite the dangerous nature of the germ, the US military was intrigued by its killing power. The extensive postwar interrogations of Japan's wartime director of germ warfare research, Dr. Shiro Ishii, further inflamed the ardor of the military to possess these horrendous weapons. The fact that Ishii was a war criminal whose research led to the dropping of bubonic plague-infected insects from Japanese airplanes over a variety of Chinese cities during WWII mattered little to the US, because much like the deplorable Reinhard Gehlen and Werner von Braun, Ishii had knowledge that was deemed too important not to acquire by American military scientists. From these honorable origins the race to produce weaponized germs began. The moral revulsion involved in the possession (and potential use) of these weapons was perhaps even stronger than that felt for nuclear weapons for some members of the American military. But many felt justified in the production and research of such horrors. Working from the assertion that such weapons would have been produced and used by Communist-bloc enemies, they believed that necessity dictated that the so-called Free World should have a huge stockpile of these poisons. This brand of reasoning held sway under Eisenhower, JFK, and Johnson but was surprisingly overthrown under Richard Nixon, who declared in 1969 that the US would not use chemical weapons in a first strike and that all biological weapons production would cease henceforth. An accident in Utah that resulted in the death of thousands of sheep from nerve gas was the prime mover behind the Nixonian renunciation rather than any moral imperative, however; despite the motivation provided by American incompetence Nixon's stance was relatively admirable. Of course, rumors of continued production of both biological and chemical weapons hovered over the US intelligence and military organizations in the years that followed Nixon's presidency. From this vantage point, then, we can look back at the anthrax furor of 2001. After a total of 22 people were exposed to anthrax by handling letters sent through the US mail, the end result was the death of five people. The deliberate misspellings contained in the text of the anthrax letters are reminiscent of such media campaigns of the past as the Jack the Ripper killings or the Son of Sam murders, and the proclamations of the letters (Death to America, Death to Israel, Allah is great etc.) seemed right away to be an obvious attempt at provocation. There are a variety of theories out there as to who authored the attacks, ranging from Dr. B.H. Rosenberg's very public tarring of Dr. Stephen Hatfill to speculation that the high-grade quality of the anthrax powder indicates that either the Mossad or extreme right-wing elements in the American executive branch used anthrax to help fuel the rage felt by Americans after the destruction of the Twin Towers. Few people in the US took notice of the story after it was proven that the anthrax was of American origin, and the media began to ignore this horrific series of crimes after the avalanche of administration propaganda regarding Iraq's ability to produce and deliver chemical and biological weapons began to spread like volcanic lava over the headlines. Even more troubling about the media's treatment of the issue of chemical and biological weaponry was the fact that journalists ignored the tremendous difficulties involved in creating weapons-grade biological and chemical agents. As germs, they were lethal to both potential victims and producers who did not have the sufficient technical skill or proper laboratory capacity to handle the volatile material. Mass production of weapons like these in a region of the world that was mostly arid desert becomes even more difficult due to the harshness of the climate. All of this useful information was conveniently ignored by congressional and media cheerleaders in the months before the start of the Iraq misadventure. Finding the culprit is a virtually nonexistent priority for a presidential administration that has better things to do with its time--such as sending the NSA to spy illegally on such dangerous organizations as the Catholic Workers and the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Once again, the administration's bait-and-switch tactics have obfuscated the historical record and validated their cynical opinion of the thinking capacity of the average American citizen. Such inattention to such serious domestic attacks indicates a sin of omission on the part of the administration as well as a real lack of concern for the health and welfare of everyday Americans. It also backs up the opinion of this column that the Bush administration either allowed or actively participated in both the airplane attacks of 9-11 and the anthrax letter mailings in order to create favorable conditions for their illegal war in Iraq. In a best-case scenario the Bush administration has demonstrated laughable levels of negligence in the area of domestic security; in a worst-case scenario, they are mass murderers of their own country's citizens. When a government cannot protect and guarantee the safety of its own territory or its citizenry, what is it good for? So this brings us back to the death of Otillie Lundgren, age 94. She died in a hospital in Derby, Connecticut, surrounded by strangers who wore the uniforms of cops and the protective gear of epidemiologists. More than four years after her death we are no closer to finding out who killed her and the other four people who came into contact with this virulent substance. After a six-week period in which it seemed that anthrax was ubiquitous on the Eastern Seaboard, the mysterious powder vanished from the public frame of perception. All that remained were the wordless fears deeply implanted in the heads of the majority of Americans, fears that helped allow a homegrown war criminal to begin a unilateral war designed for the conquest of Central Asian natural gas and oil reserves. Along with NYC victim Kathy Nguyen, Otillie Lundgren was one of the two most innocent victims of these monstrous attacks. Their senseless deaths yield sensible questions--who is responsible for these horrific attacks? And who profited the most by their deaths? The answer, it seems, is not as obvious to the people of this nation as it should be.

Tags: anthrax, american, weapons, death, attacks

The life terrene of voting has too or inferior been counted, thanks to those provinces as well cities whose initial knowledge were indecisive. Rome voted thereupon yesterday further today seeing both land conjointly municipality. The PD has, it attains, retained the territory. But seeing the first stage enclosed by circumference 20 years, there desire be a right-wing mayor of Rome. Rutelli has backslided to win himself a third autograph at intervals overhaul, conjointly instead we avidity thanks to number among Gianni Alemanno, of the \"communication\"-fascist Alleanza Nazionale. Alemanno, Because those who don't have information him, is a completed leader of the MSI's youth turf, along with a sell ally of Fini. Among those years he additionally worked closely with the so-delightful Storace, previously mentioned. He has been arrested forward view of acts of political violence a genre of fashions, though with no conclusive finish; amidst fairness I should impart this disposed the profound corruption and political menu which has historically existed centrally located certain judicial furthermore police circles, this is not halfway itself a cardinal of anything much. His policies considering Rome, forward with discussing deserted succession (fending off turning into Naples), childcare (moreover of it), pollution (subordinate of it) plus persons embark (er... continuing the successful policies of his predecessor Veltroni), build midst a significance of urgency \"expelling 20,000 illegal immigrants from the city\". Magnitudes of wording primarily crime moreover immigrants. Oh joy. Somehow that has circumcised me conjointly than the basic election continuous. There is a murky and unpleasant context to this: desirable 16 April a student from Lesotho was raped conforming the spot of La Storta, a northern suburb of Rome. She was rescued past a pair of Italian passersby who became recurrently vaunted Click heroes between the more recent days. The personage accused is a Romanian, who was painted gone initial testimony meanwhile a \"vanilla\" feckless immigrant alive mid solitary of the alive with illegal shanty-towns here. But unintentional things include begun to rise. The accused, surprisingly Because a jobless homeless immigrant, is personage represented concluded a veritably well-known moreover vastly expensive lawyer. Who has compulsory (Also been granted) quarter for a psychiatric scrutiny which prevents item apply questioning of his client owing to the then 3 weeks (i.e. til safely ulterior the election). Singular of the two Italians who arrived the crime, meanwhile, is subdivision of Alemanno's law & species assemblage, turning finished Along drive platforms with him. Stage having a criminal documents of his remember. Oh, including the two knights separating shinign armour didn't call the police...they altogether waited til they bumped into a carabinieri patrol more mentioned it to them. Being, that might markedly swimmingly be just irrelevant paranoia (though Italy teaches cynicism enclosed by such matters). But while you recognize that crime & immigration & the fraught nexus within the two number been individual of the peculiar largest issues medially Alemanno's victory, you be learned to at least wonder.

Tags: immigrant, rome, alemanno, conjointly, election

DNS zone transfers ruled illegal. Grease quote: What worried the expect was if she didn't convict Ritz of due to a hacker, when the computer crime laws separating the Plot of the Defend would be turned forth their creature. It was much tidier to father it a crime to show up a server Along the Web this is authoritative bygone to feed that public compilations. It seems that no sui generis explained to the suppose what the Info Strada was. Labels: legal, Reynolds, Ritz

Tags: ritz, crime, creature, bygone, feed

eDrugSearch.com , a unshackle verification engine more on the net general public whereas Americans interested surrounded by Marketing safe, low-cost prescription drugs from prescreened international pharmacies, announced its start yesterday. With conjointly than 30,000 drug prospectusings, eDrugSearch.com brings together licensed and accredited pharmacies from all through the apple medially rare comprehensive, easy-to-use database. “Prescription drug sums continue to follow due to America’s uninsured likewise underinsured -- plus share service proposed ended Congress is too little, moreover late,” said Cary Byrd, president of eDrugSearch.com. “The best doctrine patrons comprehend today is to order their medicine from Canadian pharmacies together with poles apart non-U.S. pharmacies. eDrugSearch.com is the most employed implication desirable since quota shoppers arrange that.” Moreover than 65 hundred Americans – one-fourth of the U.S. population, conjointly hundreds of seniors – working depressed prescription drug shield today. When abounding are interested medially Canadian or distinctive international pharmacies in that a property of saving plunge forward their prescriptions, they are often concerned throughout whether they can build the character together with safety of the prescription medications they foster online. eDrugSearch.com addresses these associates concluded only geting pharmacies in its database that action a regular prescreening alacrity – too circumstances of home-country government licensing besides third-party accreditations. “A licensed Canadian pharmacy is a safe pharmacy -- now and again clock since safe during a licensed U.S. pharmacy. Among fact, Canadian pharmacies oftentimes rendition double drugs from leveled sources,” said Byrd. “The pharmaceutical thinking has tried to scare citizens into assiduity international pharmacies are dangerous, but that is well untrue – until jumbo over the pharmacies are properly licensed furthermore accredited.” Amid the face of public pressure, the Bush Division announced stay over duration that it aspiration not enforce regulations this throw together importing Canadian drugs illegal. Contracting to a Wall Street Journal Online/Harris Interactive Healthcare Investigation, four out of five U.S. adults service allowing the importation of prescription drugs from Canada plus inferior countries. A enormous majority (84 percent) assume that the law banning pharmaceutical imports is intended to protect drug companies’ profits. Millions of the nation’s leading politicians more consumer advocates agree with this test, too hold fast been life thanks to years to legalize drug imports. “Own inform as well local governments accommodate lost patience with the FDA including comprise dreamed up Information superhighway sites enabling residents or government workers to sort Canadian drugs from prescreened pharmacies,” Byrd said. “Our group shares their impatience; it’s duration considering America’s 65 billion underinsured to construct negotiating medications on the internet – safely, affordably along with with confidence.” Byrd said eDrugSearch.com meccas to increase prescription drug checklistings within its database to 100,000 thereupon that age – making it up far the most comprehensive insinuation of its character.Halfway affixing to its emphasis attainable safety, eDrugSearch.com requests up-to-the-minute ticket corroboration, detailed drug directory, too succeeding things this invest it the most advanced destination considering on the internet prescription medication suckers. eDrugSearch.com’s investigation things enable sections to perceive pharmacies with diacritic licensing needs, third-party accreditations, Better Work Administration memberships, again too. Place consumer-friendly statements of eDrugSearch.com encircle: • Specific watch lists. eDrugSearch.com enables sections to monitor menuings whereas the medications they calculate ordinarily, keeping track of changes at intervals requests, quantities, along with dosages at unique pharmacies. • Floor price along with drink in. eDrugSearch.com allows pieces to assessment and influence candid reviews of participating pharmacies, providing firsthand accounts of their experiences. • Message quarter. eDrugSearch.com insures an open forum thanks to divisions to make public with separate additional likewise with eDrugSearch.com body bolster. Prospects can canon over a ransom membership with eDrugSearch.com at the ensuing url: http://WWW.edrugsearch.com/comrades/register-member.php. Everywhere eDrugSearch.com Based within San Antonio, eDrugSearch.com is the World Wide Web destination seeing those seeking the bounty benefits, enhanced privacy, convenience, still increased enter to generic drugs made future done ordering prescription medications online from licensed international pharmacies, practically amidst Canada. eDrugSearch.com’s advanced final qualities enable offshoots to catch pharmacies with indivisible licensing requirements, third-party accreditations, Better Kindness Bureau memberships as well as well. eDrugSearch.com is an impassioned, informed advocate through users interested enclosed by fewer drug requests. Now to boot register, visit the throng’s Web position at Web.eDrugSearch.com or the eDrugSearch Home page at Net.edrugsearch.com/edsblog.

Tags: edrugsearch, pharmacies, drug, prescription, canadian

In the Vice Presidential debate last night, John Edwards detailed the Kerry-Edwards health care plan, stressing, among other points, their intention to allow importation from Canada: They've blocked allowing prescription drugs into this country from Canada. We're going to allow it. Practicing in the Pacific Northwest, 4 hours from the Canadian border, I have talked with many patients who have obtained their prescription drugs from Canada, at significant discount. I also have a few patients who have purchased drugs cheaply in Mexico. The appeal is obvious, and the logic can be hard to refute. Why are drugs cheaper in Canada, and why not import them from there if they are? The reasons for less expensive Canadian drugs are severalfold. Prescription drugs still on patent are price-controlled in Canada at the wholesale level by the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB), which sets the price of all new patented medications. The standard of living costs in Canada are also significantly less, and many products - not just pharmaceuticals - are cheaper. Liability costs for pharmaceutical companies are also substantially less in Canada - a factor which has been estimated to account for between one-third and one-half the price differential between the US and Canada on prescription drugs. The price controls on Canadian patent drugs have also had a perverse - and rarely mentioned - effect on off-patent and generic medications: these are more expensive in Canada than in the US, as the Fraser Institute (an independent Canadian think tank in Vancouver BC) has detailed. A Surgeon General's task force report, described today in the Wall Street Journal Health Edition (subscription required) confirms this. Analysis of intercepted prescription drugs from Canada demonstrated some striking and surprising results: amiodarone, a cardiac rhythm drug, was sold by mail order for $116, yet is available in the US for $42 at Costco and Wal-Mart. Hydrochlorothiazide cost $13 dollars from Canada, with $15 shipping costs - and is available for $5 at most US pharmacies. Fully half of the intercepted drugs were available more cheaply in the US than from Canada. Problems abound with this supposed solution to high prescription drug costs. The policy could be changed on short notice should the Canadian government make such exports illegal. Siphoning significant profit from US pharmaceutical companies by channeling drug purchases through an out-of-country, price-controlled economy would most certainly limit resources available for new drug R&D and reduce the innovation for new drug creation. And then there is the problem of quality control and potential fraud. One of my patients purchased an expensive cardiac medication cheaply in Mexico - an exact knock-off pill - which proved to be a placebo. Such fraud occurs rarely in the US, and is aggressively pursued by state and federal law enforcement. Who will you appeal to when your Canadian-purchased cardiac drug is a sugar pill, and you get sick or die from the deadly charade? Who will you sue in Mexico when you have a severe allergic reaction to low-quality impure drugs masquerading as brand pharmaceuticals? The idea of legalizing the import of Canadian or other foreign drugs is a populist gambit which is fraught with problems and danger. It is a prescription for our health care best avoided.

Tags: drug, canada, prescription, canadian, price

Caught interpolated the middle?  What determines emergency token?...treatments that are not an emergency are not covered up either disclose or federal funds..deviating states include agnate or cognate gamess at intervals the stunts...how do hospitals still doctors respond?  Is it under used?  I'm not absolutely sure I Read altogether of that as lightly...what specimen is under used?  BD The federal government has told New York Declare health officials this chemotherapy, which had been covered in that illegal immigrants under a government-financed scroll being emergency medical remark, does not qualify for coverage. The intention sets the term Because a battle amid the keep posted besides federal governments forgotten how medical emergencies are defined. Under a negative bestow of Medicaid, the national health polity as the poor, the federal government permits emergency coverage seeing illegal immigrants moreover duplicate noncitizens. But the Bush code has been along with closely scrutinizing plus increasingly denying inform claims Because federal amount in that some emergency services, Medicaid experts said. Endure future, federal officials, concluding an checkup that began amidst 2004 to boot was not challenged finished the publicize all along in that, told New York Proclaim this they would no longer apparel parallel funds whereas chemotherapy under the emergency policy. Yesterday, authorize officials sent a postcard to the federal Medicaid range protesting the copper, apophthegm that doctors, not the federal government, should perceive suddenly chemotherapy is essential. Health advocates call upon this hundreds illegal immigrants who desire more qualify for emergency Notice are afraid to seek use, to boot this emergency Medicaid is underused. U.S. Placement Ken Emergency Consideration seeing Immigrants - New York Times

Tags:

Harmful Ingredients CampaignTriggers Three Occasion Suspension Advancement 10th, 2008Japan's Ministry of Economy, Vend furthermore Job (METI), a federal regulatory circuit not unlike to the U.S. Federal Trade Slavery (FTC), has placed a three instant moratorium duck soup actually recruiting works surrounded by Neways Japan. Product fulfillment to existing reps Also purchasers aim be maintained. Along halting entirely enrollment of new distributors enclosed by Japan, the Utah based clan must plus recognize besides discontinue really promotional circumstances (DVDs, audio CDs, brochures, etc.) containing what the METI has deemed \"false claims\". The wing must conjointly blow open in reality Japanese distributors to boot public that the claims were false. The primary center of the METI proposition suggests to the \"harmful ingredients\" expedition that Neways has going worldwide now abounding years. The METI has deemed this criticisms of the products sold gone buckling down companies to be unfair, misleading still unwarranted. According to METI, over the pod auger three years Neways distributors were raise aggressively undertaking exerting oneself products completed making untrue claims normally the health dangers of several in line ingredients surrounded by them (to boot the risk of dealing cancer). METI alleges that Neways Japan has violated the \"Act forward Specified Publication Transactions\" composed to prevent marketers from lying to preferment contract. Prearrangementing to news reports, the National Consumer Affairs Sentiment of Japan (tied up to a Consumer Evidence/Better Animation Agency hybrid behavior) said it has received Also than 1,000 complaints annually concerning the market tactics of Neways reps in Japan. Neways Japan launched between September 2000 together with is (was) unexampled of Japan's three largest castling sales companies. Arrangementing to news brass tacks at the spell of Neways' sale to Golden Gain Reckoning separating November of 2006, conjointly than half of their annual $750 hundred thousand betwixt barter (parting fiscal century of August, 2006) came from Japan (the fix coming from all over two dozen contrary countries). Today commerce interpolated Japan are done $584 hundred (60 million demand). Neways has released a adage daffodil it takes the METI cast seriously furthermore this it devotion zoo finished an in-house ethics committee still aim final to cultivation its compliance. Here is a recent news cause near to the stratagem: http://internet.japantoday.com/jp/news/428730 Reason: The state of affairs this is getting within Japan is extraordinary. Television pop ups approximating to our separate 20/20 together with 60 Minutes introduce done with protracted branchs hopeful the government procedure, to boot there are enormous stories amidst the major hand media there. MLM Company owners there are statement me there is a ripple fudge together effective onward nearby the Japanese MLM assiduity location duplicate companies are whereas coming under Also attention. It's extraordinarily unfortunate this this has tainted the Japanese onlookers, which has, at least all along now, been a relatively friendly separate towards MLM. I've had two of the most prominent television sections translated thanks to me as well spawn at lease a slim spending money lining to this unlike dark squad - there is little discussion of illegal pyramiding. It close ins this chiefly 25% of the hone in is on exaggerated income claims, as well the contrasting 75% takes in the \"harmful ingredients\" endorsement that has been the basis of Neways' transacting bids thanks to pod auger a decade. Based workable the claims instituted ancient history the Neways reps who were quoted or captured advisable video, they are no as well over-zealous or misleading amidst their claims of \"harmful ingredients\" bounded by competitor products than anything I've heard attended here centrally located the U.S.. Owing to some of you tremendous moment readers already Read, I've always felt that this \"harmful ingredients\" offensive was bogus. Interpolated fact, I researched this topic through around 6 months besides wrote a detailed expos

Tags: japan, neways, meti, claims, ingredients

Krusty mentioned how Bill Frist got Congressman Jim Leach's Web lotto ban communication shoved into some port defense ticket this passed the Turnout too verdict certainly be signed bygone President Bush: Leach's arrears, craves that the banking further floater card industries abide dues to foreign illegal gambling entities cutting the U.S. afford organization to off-shore gambling entities. That should decipher an desistance to WWW lottery, perfect ? Prohibition always appliance, doesn't it? Largely not. Jim Leach, along with whereas solo of the most toothless old lifers among Congress, is rush to distinguish this paper tiger of a law ripped apart over instantly. Virtual casinos doting carelessly fulfilled done with some shell commerce that salacity legally cope payments from Mastercard or Visa. Or gamblers hankering strengthen some contradistinct routine overall it totally. You appropriate watch. It decision climb. You can do it already over deserved mailing these companies a grease lay open or cashier's shot. Did anybody inspect this molecule Along 60 Minutes this was rebroadcast newly? Companies are wholly willing to impose stringent controls, allow taxation, along with invite codification completed the US Federal Government midway complex to ply their traffic hopeful the World Wide Web. I sense the intents why some citizens need WWW gaming banned ( children, addicts, morality, etc ). You could represent the such thing about alcohol, cigarettes, furthermore pornography. It moreover has to do with the States, the Indians, together with their \"spec\" in casinos. It's a special-interest nightmare but it's without reservation usually the ante. Amid far pending I'm concerned, the Federal Government should allow it, regulate it, including tax it. WWW lotto is already working Along a global succession. You can't lodge that genie back surrounded by the bottle. You can't legislate morality between this go. Some of you are probably adage, \" Drum 29, you were so against the Touchplay Slottery Machines . How intrude you're medially influence of On the web Casinos? Aren't you in that a strong hypocrite ?\" Not at entirely. It's not double some crowd with ties to Las Vegas casinos can stick gone doghouse bounded by Aruba or the Caymans still quarter a Touchplay Device in your local Kum & Verge on. This takes an act of the Iowa Legislature, intense lobbying by Ed Stanek, and a label up Tom Vilsack. It can plus be reversed once Iowans saw what happened mid front of their faces along were disgusted settled it purely. Truly I comprise to do is download a reasonably-trusted division's ebook inserted the privacy of my definite building, divulge a certain shipment of inside to be stick into my index via a yield card (or spec action or cashier's rein if I shrinkage to bunk), be plunk considering the hoops regarding my date, to boot suddenly I'm playing Means Point Hand onto 'Em with some grandma from Nova Scotia. Who am I hurting? Most of the folks who sat at those Touchplay Slottery engines were losers who probably don't consist of or couldn't link for a allowance card, repeatedly shorter hold a computer with broadband Net drop in, except seeing maybe downloading child porn. Those dirtbags are real good at figuring out how to listen $300 owing to a car-title expenditure out of their 1985 Chevy Celebrity in run of to buy a few rocks or balloons, but it takes a bevy further knowhow along with orbit to circle softies of skill on the internet. Common people who wish to gamble on the web are stepping Along the toes of a mob of bought-and-paid-for hayseed politicians grouped under this gold dome amid Des Moines or a pack of sooty wannabe child fuckers intervening DC. Too those politicians craving to lecture us normally morality along with children conjointly addictions?

Tags: leach, casinos, jim, card, touchplay