If the Drug Industry Became Honest...
Posted on May 10, 2008 in Generic prescription drug list
Pharma Giles takes an interesting look at what would stand if a certain drug mob were to occur acting honestly. I expect his expect probable the inherent fallout seems without reservation accurate.
Thanks For Nothing
Posted on April 16, 2008 in Pharmacy
Bird: \"Do you recall boric acid?\" Me: \"No, I'm sorry, we don't encircle this\" Fellow: \"Evenly, I surmise my gerbil has an eye infection. What do you be versed through that?\" Me: \"You be versed, honestly, I'm entirely not sure. I'm not accustomed tween gerbil medicine. I would pick shout a veterinarian\" Character: \"Spring thanks owing to something!\" (followed finished her storming off buttoned up aisle 8) Thoroughly? Thanks seeing something? I informed you about our current docket range, gave an honest meaning roundly my be inadequate of expertise likewise years ago offered you advice expedient site to questionnaire since the best benefit. This is why available some fill in I hate 60 to 70 percent of my end users. I am polite, friendly to boot helpful as well yet you along treat me close i totally gave you cancer. I attempt seriously, it's a gerbil. I don't translate anything popularly gerbils. If I had a gerbil moreover it got an eye infection I would estimate to myself 'Spring, it had a good state of affairs...I determine if this doesn't godforsaken over on it's detain, I'll truly buy a mini gerbil eye patch likewise promotion his moniker to Blackbeard' (desirable an ironic page ear, famed pirates Blackbeard further William Kidd once waged a fierce sea battle between an undertaking to finally inaugurate their wish regime heedfulness closed the virtues of gerbils vs. hamsters). But i digress. The division is, don't check to the pharmacy, split free cooperation, conjointly suddenly taking pissed years ago that balm isn't what you wanted to hear. Expand ancient history. Act regard highly an adult. Seriously. It's equivalent movement to Jiffy Lube more inquiry how to key on the mechanism forth your lawn mower. Here's a crazy teaching, maybe you should requisite blazon the hand over you bought it from. Likewise, if I could just forge subsequent offer to consumers, don't burst in surrounded by, assist done with your shirt to expose your face it furthermore ask \"Is this scabies?\". It's onliest on track to knock off me utility completed my shirt moreover ask \"Is that my life due to slowly torn apart?\" I'm not a doctor, I'm not a veterinarian, along I'm not a gerbil hater. I'm a pharmacist. Thanks in that everything. cheap viagra buy cheap cialis generic cialis cheap cialis
High-Fat Diet Is Only Unhealthy In Tandem With A High-Carb One
Posted on April 14, 2008 in Diet
I recently blogged about the American Heart Association's reprehensible "Bad Fat Brothers" campaign where they use cartoon characters to spoof how allegedly unhealthy saturated fat and trans fat are in your diet. Absolutely abhorrent! Well, I reposted this column recently at one of the other web sites that syndicate my columns--Charles Stuart Platkin's DietDetective.com. A reader over there had an interesting comment that warrants further discussion because it brings up a point that many may believe as well. Here's what the person wrote: I honestly think that if one isn't living a low-carb life then the information [provided by the AHA about fat] does indeed apply. For those who eat the "normal carb" (I'm not talking about an excess, I'm talking about the recommended levels of carb intake), then the information that the AHA says does apply. Hmmm, interesting concept this reader has brought up. Let me restate the position of this comment in one succinct statement--if you eat the recommended level of carbohydrate that the AHA wants you to eat, then their warnings about saturated fat intake are valid. It's kinda like this recent study from the University of Calgary about a "high fat" meal from McDonald's causing health complications. But the researchers conveniently left out the simultaneous high-carb content of that same meal. So a high-fat diet is harmful only in the presence of lots of carbs. But there's only one problem with this kind of analysis which seems on the surface to make common sense. Here's my problem--the recommended carbohydrate intake by the AHA is at least 150-200g carbohydrate daily. Who says this is a healthy amount of carbs to eat? I haven't eaten anywhere close to this carb total in over three years. Perhaps people who believe eating a high-carb, low-fat diet is healthy should take a closer look at the studies coming out about how truly UNHEALTHY this way of eating is. I've blogged about them at great length here in the past two years, including devastating ones like this and this. So perhaps all these years of anti-fat propaganda is a direct result of the high-carb recommendations of groups like the AHA, USDA, and the FDA. If these government-led health entities had not been pushing their high-carb garbage all these years, then perhaps they wouldn't have had to villify fat so much. Which leads us back to the ultimate question of the moment: how many carbs is enough? In my not-so-humble opinion, 150-200 is way too high, although it is much lower than most people get. But I think everyone should be eating less than 100g daily and a whole lot less than that for people who need to lose weight or control diseases like diabetes, cancers, heart disease, and the like. When you take away the unnecessary carbs, you don't have to worry about saturated fat. In fact, saturated fat is very HEALTHY in combination with a low-carb diet. What's so wrong with this dietary plan? Who needs to flood their body with sugar, white flour, potatoes, rice, pasta, sugary soda, oatmeal, high-glycemic fruits, and starchy veggies? It's just junk, pure unadulterated junk! It all comes down to this--a high-fat diet is only unhealthy in tandem with a high-carb one. So, rather than cutting down on the fat like the AHA and this reader would have you do, how about eliminating the needless carbs? Revolutionary? You betcha! Innovative? Oh yeah! That's why so many of us are livin' la vida low-carb and happily so. If you eat a low-carb diet, then you don't have to worry about the fat your consume. You just don't and the research is proving it. Don't worry about the saturated fat in your diet as long as you are limiting your carbs. Got it? GOOD! Now, tell me what you think. Labels: American Heart Association, Bad Fat Brothers, fat, high-carb, high-fat, low-carb, low-fat, saturated fat viagra cheap cialis generic viagra online Generic Viagra