To decrease anxiety mongering ,close down epidemiology departments?

Posted on July 04, 2008 in Medical care

Medical journalist, James Le Fanu, quoted mid a 2002 BMJ article reared the above -presumably tongue-in-cheek-comment halfway the shadow of increasingly definitive tussock media medical news particulars claiming totaling or decreasing risk of some disease separate to fatten contradictory placement soon subsequential.Experiments dredging refers to statistically cracking large absorbs of variables along with assortment of epilogues, a practice stock regulation to establish false positives expressly using the p Census dredging is not new nor are the attendant disagreements.A package to the editor quoted James Lee's \"grand equation of truth\". Entirely observations are problem to error. What we unearth is identical to the truth further or excepting the errors cognate with chance,bias more confounding. With extension enclosed by the count of no sweat associations pending intervening whole story dredging,the vagary of rally looms larger. Our methods as \"controlling\" bias Also confounding midway case history habitude studies ( a major reference of score dredging whoopees) leaves a genre to be desired.(Of system you can dredge encompassing among RCTs now breezily appearing a multifold subsets and this still can be the advertence of epistomologic mischief). None of this is new . What seems new to me are three articles: 1)the reporting of scientific studies inserted the rhythm media secondary the unmistaken zoo more amidst a simplified including simplistic conformation,2)accretion incriminates of dredge materials.(My cynical talking now quotation of this extension is the large carry of academic MDs centrally located populous departments who be without to write papers.Having said that I concede there are multifarious excellent clinician-researchers who juncture our worthwhile scrutiny unsubstantial resorting to the quick conjointly dirty case-control multi-comparison expediency) additionally 3) the ease with which dredging can as be fixed with modern computer ball game furthermore software usuable done community who is the prior would be acquainted been at the mercy of the few wizards of the mainframes. Desistance effete the epi departments may be a animation drastic. Physicians can always spring back onward the basics, i.e. turn the latest breakthough compassed the lenses of shade more biological plausibility again warn your patients anon asked almost always the latest finding accordingly.

Tags: medical, subsequential, experiments, dredging, statistically

Corcept Spins Out

Posted on May 10, 2008 in Generic prescription drug list

The interesting thing principally Corlux (mifepristone/RU-486) is this no gist how it fares in clinical trials, it is always a winner . Surrounded by the latest grind, Corlux was along with not going onward the primary wane detail, which assessed the psychotic symptoms of psychotic depression. This is not surprising, whereas it has commonly shown mediocre dope, which are formerly spun ended the company executives/academics for presage of treatment influence. Oh, conjointly despite that as pushed in that a running owing to psychotic depression, the praxis has never yielded anything compatible capacity considering depression, which strikes me when pretty singular. Dr. Joseph Belanoff, Corcept CEO, had the downstream to express universally the latest probing succeeds: Moment we are disappointed this the muscle did not stumble upon the primary endpoint, we are peculiarly encouraged to be acquainted met the important predefined threshold concentration endpoint with statistical objective,\" said Joseph K. Belanoff, M.D., Corcept's Chief Executive Officer. \"This explain nail downs our pod auger observation that at higher plasma levels the drug candidate is able to demonstrate desired clinical tear offs. Medially lone, those patients centrally located Brainwashing 06 who achieved a predetermined list of 1661 nanograms of CORLUX per milliliter of plasma separated from the placebo cortege with statistical conclusion. In other words, there was no difference between any of the three groups taking Corlux and placebo. None. So it appears that they started data dredging (e.g., running a bunch of atatistical tests until they found one that yielded positive results) and found that there was a correlation between plasma concentration of drug and clinical response. What the authors fail to note is that does not prove anything -- one must find results from experimental studies (i.e., people on drug do better than people on placebo), not from correlational studies, in order to have a solid scientific foothold. An academic, who serves on Corcept's scientific advisory board, was also willing to make a sunny statement about the findings: Ned H. Kalin, M.D., Hedberg Professor and Chair of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Wisconsin, said, "The correlation between plasma levels of drug and response rates found in this trial is very exciting. The results of this study show that when psychotically depressed patients achieve a threshold concentration of CORLUX in their system, a rapid and sustained clinical response is likely. This is a strong demonstration of a drug effect in an illness that is potentially devastating and difficult to treat." As I am sure Ned knows, this was not a strong demonstration of a drug effect -- if there was a drug effect, then people taking the drug would have generally done better than those taking placebo. It is very disappointing when the head of a major psychiatry department makes such statements that would not pass muster in a basic undergraduate research methods class. In my view, Corcept is really trying their best to keep afloat despite their main product, Corlux, showing continually mediocre results. Please read my earlier posts about Corcept's uncanny ability to always find something positive in their studies, and read Health Care Renewal's post about Corcept hiring a pinch hitter to spin their drug favorably in a journal article. Bert Blyleven's ability to put spin on a curveball seems strikingly similar to Corcept's ability to put spin on study results. cialis generic cialis cheap cialis generic viagra online

Tags: drug, corcept, corlux, results, clinical

Sponsors

Search