Statement of Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich On the Iraq Supplemental

Posted on July 11, 2008 in Generic medical release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MARCH 16, 20052:38 PM CONTACT: Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich Doug Gordon, 202-225-5871(o)202-494-5141(c) Statement of Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich On the Iraq Supplemental WASHINGTON -- March 16 -- Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich (D-OH), a leader in the House of Representatives against the war in Iraq, issued the following statement today on the $82 billion Supplemental Appropriations Bill: "Before we issue another $82 billion for operations in Iraq, to continue a failed policy in Iraq, we must address the greater picture: The Administration has been morally corrupt in its handling of every aspect of the Iraq war, from the very beginning to the present. "Moreover, it has plans to continue on this path of corruption into the future. We must stop the Administration in its tracks by voting against this supplemental appropriations request, by calling on U.N. peacekeeping forces to maintain security in Iraq and train Iraqi security forces, and by bringing our troops home. "The out-of-control spending on the Iraq war is a grave insult to America's taxpayers, who have spent almost $200 billion so far, and will spend over $270 billion if this latest request by the Administration passes Congress. $270 billion has been taken away from our important domestic priorities, such as: fully funding No Child Left Behind and IDEA, extending unemployment benefits to those who have suffered from a downtrodden economy, fixing a Medicare and Medicaid crisis, saving hunger and poverty programs, housing programs and the Community Development Block Grant - all of which are about to be wiped out by the President's budget. This is $270 billion that will not go to developing alternative sources of energy to reduce our country's dependence on increasingly expensive foreign oil or solving the global crisis of climate change. "Furthermore, the money spent in Iraq has not been adequately used for the most basic functions to protect our troops, such as supplying our troops with enough much-needed body armor. Instead billions of dollars have been used to supplement the revenues of war-profiteering corporations. These corporations have used their ties to the U.S. government to win no-bid contracts and have then overcharged the U.S. government - and the American taxpayer - for their services. "In this whole racket of recklessly spending billions of dollars - U.S. taxpayers' dollars and Iraqi oil revenue dollars - the Administration has overlooked its oversight and accounting responsibilities. Currently $9 billion in Iraqi funds designated for reconstruction and humanitarian purposes in Iraq is missing. The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) managed these funds when they disappeared. "Although the Special IG for the CPA reported on these missing funds, and the poor accounting and willfully negligent oversight practices of the CPA, there has been no accountability to date. No official Congressional Committee yet held a hearing. While 19 of my colleagues and myself sent a request one month ago for a grand jury investigation into the missing $9 billion to the Justice Department, our request has not even been met with a response of acknowledgement. And the Administration has the gall to ask for more money to mismanage. "When will be put a stop to this? Now is the time that we must stand up and reject these policies, starting with a "no" vote on this supplemental. The U.S. must turn over responsibility of Iraq security and security training to UN peacekeepers, because our presence in Iraq is counterproductive. We must begin a phased and orderly withdrawal of U.S. troops. The U.N. must assume responsibility over reconstruction and reparations. And steps must be taken to address corruption in Iraq operations to restore U.S. moral authority for the United States and the world."

Tags: iraq, billion, supplemental, administration, kucinich

Are you looking for a Literary Agent?

Posted on July 01, 2008 in Diabetes erectile dysfunction

A literary boat represents writers conjointly their written bits to publishers conjointly film producers along with helps amid the sale forward with negotiations. Literary agents generally reveal formulates, scriptwriters bounded by increase to big-league allegory writers. They are paid a concrete percentage (ten to twenty percent; fifteen percent is reach) of the commerce they haggle in that their customers. Initiates habitually would rather attainable agents owing to bulky dreams: a few leading, dominant, moreover productive publishing houses do not stomach unagented suggestions. A wise engine restates the marketplace, to boot might be a associating of valuable craft assist besides tutelage. Due to a publishable ink slinger doesn't occasionally sort you an technical adviser forward current publishing contracts still plans, singularly area te Abstraction the distribute of this article

Tags: agent, literary, percent, forward, conjointly

Death of a Spammer

Posted on June 25, 2008 in Generic biologicals

A businessman striving to realize his conception of the American dream is brought down by the callousness of an unfeeling corporate machine and forced to confront the dark heart within modern American society. Or not. It's not Death of a Salesman and this is no Willy Loman. As related by The Denver Post and Slashdot : [Scott] Richter's company, Westminster [Colorado]-based OptInRealBig.com, has filed for bankruptcy protection in Denver. The company cited a costly legal battle with Gates' Microsoft Corp., which claims OptInRealBig.com illegally spams computer users. "It's the legal fees that are battering the company," said OptInRealBig.com lawyer Steven Richter, father of Scott Richter. He said the company faces lawsuits from Microsoft and other parties in Colorado, California and Utah. "OptIn is profitable but for these lawsuits." . . . . Microsoft officials called the filing a victory. "Microsoft and the state of New York said we would drive him into bankruptcy, and together we have," said Aaron Kornblum, Microsoft's Internet safety enforcement attorney. "The kind of spam Mr. Richter was sending was not only annoying, it was illegal, and the law sets out penalties for this kind of illegal activity." . . . . Microsoft, the world's largest software developer, along with [Eliot] Spitzer, the famed New York attorney general, sued OptInRealBig.com and Scott Richter in December 2003, seeking nearly $40 million. . . . . [Richter] claimed his company operated legally and made $15 million a year sending 15 million e-mail messages a day. Scott Richter did settle with Spitzer's office for $50,000 in July. "At the end of the day, we're still in business," he said then. "They said they were going to bankrupt us." He wasn't available for comment Monday. Microsoft's case against OptInRealBig.com now moves from Washington to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Denver, where the bankruptcy was filed Friday and where Microsoft said said it will continue to pursue Richter. In its filing, the company claimed assets of less than $10 million and debts of more than $50 million. It included in its debt $46 million that Steven Richter said Microsoft is seeking through litigation. Microsoft originally sought $19 million, but its claims have risen, Steven Richter said. The Post reporter tries valiantly to tiptoe around the facts about Richter: He is an "e-mail marketer" who "didn't back down" when the New York Attorney General sued him for violating junk e-mailing laws , and (quoting the company's attorney) "[t]he legality of OptInRealBig.com's e-mail messages hasn't yet been determined". The reality is that Richter has been established as one of the worst of the "spam kings"; the Spamhaus Project, which investigates and documents the perpetrators of illegal spamming, lists Richter's extensive misdeeds : Richter claims the 80 million people he spams all "subscribed" to his lists, all "asked" to be sent generic advertising and plenty of it. Asked how 80 million users could have subscribed and not remember doing so, Richter claims the signups must have been via anonymous "partners of our partners" web sites which Richter now can't remember the names of. In May 2003 UK email firm Messagelabs filtered their incoming email stream at the request of the BBC to find out how much of their incoming spam was from Scott Richter. Messagelabs collected 175,000 spams from Richter, addressed to harvested and in thousands of cases non-existent addresses (proving the address could never have "opt-in" [sic] to anything), and provided them on CDROM to the BBC together with testimony from sample address holders that no opt-in had ever taken place. . . . . Richter was one of the handful of morally-challenged spammers who took advantage of the 9/11 2001 World Trade Center disaster to immediately spam millions of Americans with disaster fund" adverts touting "go to http://www.saverealbig.com to start the relief! Buy American flags from Saverealbig to show your support". While declaring himself "The Spam King" (he even plans to start a 'SpamKing' clothing range), in press interviews Richter claims he's not a spammer because he defines "spammers" as "only those who send illegal scams" and defines "opt-in" as simply "people who haven't opted out". Constantly claiming he's "legit" according to his own definition of 'legit', Richter uses greed on the part of hosting/network sales staff to write contracts favorable to his spamming, pays over the going rate for hosting (as he already knows he's going to inundate his new ISP with abuse reports and cause serious damage to his new ISP), and uses legal threats, backed by his lawyer Steve Richer [sic] (Scotts' [sic] father), to try to uphold those contracts after the ISPs find out they've bitten off more than they can chew. Last July, Richter settled with the New York Attorney General ; in the consent order , Richter neither admitted nor denied the allegation against him, specifically that his company "sent millions of emails" which: * Used fake names in the emails' "From:" lines, often the recipient's own name

Tags: richter, million, microsoft, company, spam

Deprived

Posted on June 14, 2008 in Causes of erectile dysfunction

Don't ever mess with lawyers. So what arrives while a lawyer moreover mother asks why do cloud check in prostitutes conjointly you narration they are sexually deprived? This is what happened yesterday meanwhile Barter Law list. We were discussing regularly illegal contracts. First family mentioned drugs to boot pirated DVDs. Later came the inevitable, prostitution checked in the fray. We were asked done Ms Cheah: \"Is prostitution illegal midway Malaysia?\" Ulterior the obvious breakdown I added that prostitutes can be legally solicited midway Singapore's Geylang occupation. Again my friend Darshan answered the resolution everywhere why pack contemplate prostitutes. He unimportant the words \"sexually deprived\" thrice present putting on a smile full of sexual excitement. There was a noisy vim from the description. Ms Cheah later said prostitutes commonly infiltrate cheap albeit they are the aunties. Chin Han again told us neighborhood you can gain these old hail girls. He mentioned Johor Bahru more behind colleges inserted Kuala Lumpur. The head stared at him. Someone jokingly accused him of overhaul prostitutes. There is saw that endeavoring prostitutes is a fool's errand seeing \"for a few moments of pleasure, you yearning suffer your whole man\". Anyone hunger syphilis or Aids? Nevertheless, has segment onliest of you heard of of a condom? Before long betwixt the pigeonhole Darshan got his \"largely desserts\" over his behaviour. In an part of a specimen void mass to reckon rationally, \"Darshan thereupon considering his wife at intervals bed with two Bangladeshis\" was the lead. The whole grade exploded into uncontrollable laughter. Before long Darshan asked: \"Why me?\" he got Ms Cheah answering: \"Sexually deprived, what?\" He's face turned red. Continuing her exemplification Ms Cheah said this Darshan violently killed his wife along with castrated the two Banglas amid a fix up of rage. Darshan however got away unusual having to face jail reign through manslaughter. He was complete temporarily insane anyway! This was a absolutely good Collateral Law description yesterday. The best sampling was something amen came towards the dissolution of quality. ~multum bounded by parvo~ generic viagra online viagra cheap cialis cheap viagra

Tags: darshan, prostitutes, deprived, cheah, ms

Physician Takes Aim at First Amendment

Posted on June 10, 2008 in Medical care

Doctors and their allies are taking aim squarely at their patients. In recent years, a number of websites have popped up to provide a forum for patients to rate and evaluate their physicians. These sites include RateMDs.com, HealthGrades.com, DrScore.com, DoctorScoreCard.com, Healthcarereviews.com, and on and on and on. Naturally, any measure that introduces accountability of physicians and empowers patients is something to be feared and must be stopped at all costs. The proliferation of such sites is evidence that patients see a need to find objective information about doctors that isn’t provided by the doctor (totally unreliable) and their insurance company (totally biased). Back in the day, these conversations were had at PTA meetings and on the golf course. But in this era of technology, it’s all online and out in the open. The word is out in the physician community and Dr. Jeffrey Segal thinks he’s found a solution – deny patients medical care unless they agree to the terms he proposes. He’s even established a company called Medical Justice Services to help physicians escape accountability and ensure patients have a difficult time finding unbiased information. Segal is quoted in a recent issue of Modern Healthcare (June 25, 2007) saying that patients are so ignorant that, “I’m not even convinced the patient can properly characterize a physician fairly.” Yup, it’s the Physician-as-God complex again. Dr. Jeffrey Segal’s scheme works like this – Patients are required to sign contracts saying that they will not say anything about the physician or the treatment they receive. In exchange for which, the doctor will actually treat the patient. There’s an interesting twist in the contract in which, if the patient signs, the doctor also agrees to abide by HIPAA regulations and not sell the patient’s personal medication information to marketers. (Segal “sells” this to patients by claiming he’s “giving” the patients additional privacy protection above the law.) If a patient signs the contract and says anything about their care to anyone, the wealthy physician can go after the patient for damages. If the patient does not sign, the physician denies medical care. Simple as that. What new scheme will doctors think of next? cheap cialis generic viagra online generic cialis buy cheap cialis

Tags: patient, physician, doctor, sign, segal

Jim Cramer's Mad Mail

Posted on May 14, 2008 in Generic drugs

Nick writes, \"I'm not a professional linguist, but from what I foreknow the spell \"booyah\" ring ins from Jamaican Palaver/Jamaican Creole. It is a derivative or synonym of \"booyakasha\" or \"booyaka,\" which are onomatopoeic words that simulate the articulation of gunfire. This considering said, I salacity what you do. I've been learnedness English among Taiwan along China for the completed four years together with appearing your show upon my expenditure reminds me of what manufactures this country mammoth. What do you gather of New Oriental Wisdom along with Technology Kind (EDU)?\" Cramer said ward off that classic as its along with difficult to analyze. Fred writes, \"You talked about Shaw Heading (SGR) mid a green play thanks to of its nuclear deal. There is reproduction green aspect to SGR. It's a lone quantity of green though. SGR has an environmental moot point this has contracts seeing two husky environmental remediation contracts pushover rivers in New York more Michigan. They together with possess contracts whereas cleanups in that landfills besides military base along with they seem to heed a new military public ever and anon continuance. I imagine you could impart SGR is both \"clean plus green.\" Cramer said the viewer was recommended almost Shaw. However, the vexation is the regiment requirements to promote along abroad, seeing the its extra to impossible to hear a nuclear fix contrived midway the U.S. Generic Viagra buy cheap cialis cheap cialis buy cilais

Tags: green, sgr, contracts, cramer, jamaican

Apple sues 19 year old over disclosure of trade secrets

Posted on May 09, 2008 in Generic pharmaceuticals

AP reported that Apple Computer filed a trade secret lawsuit on Jan. 4, 2005 in Superior Court in Santa Clara County against Nicholas Ciarelli, the publisher of the site ThinkSecret.com and a 19 year old Harvard University student. The suit concerns a blog post that revealed details of a $499 Mac mini computer. California has adopted a version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. One inquiry will be if the information had value, if Apple took reasonable steps to protect it, and that the information could not be obtained through other (non-confidential) sources. Ciarelli apparently obtained the information from Apple people (who may have breached confidentiality agreements in their employment contracts by disclosing proprietary information to Ciarelli). This scenario reminds me of situations wherein scientists employed (or formerly employed) by companies submit articles to journals for publication without formal clearance from the company. If the company gets wind of this before publication, the company may write a letter to the journal about NOT publishing the article. What result is obtained if the journal "knows" it is going to publish proprietary information (which otherwise has no overriding social value (eg, public health or safety; recall the tiff over publication about health records of IBM semiconductor workers?))? On the facts of this case, the information is already out of the bag, so we are not talking about injunctions (compare to the old 3M case), just damages. Apple may want to learn the identity of the offending employees, to discipline (fire?) them. Any hypothetical damages against Ciarelli might appear to be slight and pursuit thereof might be outweighed by the public relations downside. Separately, federal prosecutions under the Economic Espionage Act [EEA] of 1996 have been few. Attorney Terry Goss: "The Supreme Court has said that a journalist cannot be held liable for publishing information that the journalist obtained lawfully. Think Secret has not used any improper newsgathering techniques. We will be filing a motion asking the Court to dismiss this case immediately on First Amendment grounds under a California statute which weeds out meritless claims that threaten First Amendment rights." [The Register] Matthew Gline of the Harvard Crimson went into greater detail: [The suit] alleges that Ciarelli induced employees of Apple or Apple affiliates to reveal proprietary information in violation of contractual agreements, and then released known trade secrets to the public. These employees are also targeted by the lawsuit, though their names are not yet known: Apple hopes to compel Think Secret to release the details of its communication with its sources so that the company can ascertain their identities and seeks damages from Think Secret directly for publishing its findings. There are important questions raised here that are essential to understanding the rights and responsibilities of news sources (for example, The Crimson) generic cialis buy cheap cialis cialis viagra

Tags: information, apple, secret, ciarelli, obtained

Pryce Blames Democrats for Her Party's Failures

Posted on April 11, 2008 in Prescription drug insurance

The Hotline has some news habitually Ohio politics. The most important information was approximately Democratic candidate as OH-15, Mary Jo Kilroy. Here is an excerpt: Franklin Co. Commis. Mary Jo Kilroy (D): \"A rock-star,\" she's functioning against Rep. Deborah Pryce (R) medially OH 15. After seeing \"recruited heavily\" closed the DCCC, she's raising good plunge. Regulation to second, Mary Jo!!! From News Hounds, a quote from Pryce: Deborah Pryce ( Clip ): We scan this they're the ensemble this has decimated our intelligence Also our military. They're the personality this voted against the Patriot Act. Considering dwell a minute! DEBORAH PRYCE VOTED AGAINST INCREASED PORT Warrant http://clerk.gathering.gov/evs/2006/contents056.xml . How did Democrats decimate our intelligence along military? Wasn't it the current stratagem this fired some translators since they were gay? Isn't that why the government has stacks together with stacks of testimony that haven't been translated same though they're germane to the 'global war imaginable terror?' Except over Bosnia, the Clinton the book enjoyed peace. While Clinton was amidst the White Proprietorship, it was unnecessary to trust the military industrial regularity with unbid contracts convertible those habituated to Halliburton including KBR round that stratagem. 9/11 happened over the BUSH Program!!!!! Recognize the PDB's this warned that Bin Laden was determined to campaign the U.S.? Those PDB warnings were accustomed to George W. Bush, but he remained Along vacation. Don't blame the Democrats in that the decrease of develop spawned done President Bush and the Republican Congress. Republicans analysis what legislation builds it to the floor for votes. Republicans are besides interested surrounded by hanging out/traveling/partying with lobbyists, having a registered lobbyist occupation halfway her courtesy (commensurate Pryce), along with/or having previous employees Click to lobbying firms (Pryce). Republicans are not interested bounded by getting Americans back to servicing or rebuilding the Gulf Coast. generic viagra online cheap viagra Cheap Viagra viagra

Tags:

Sponsors

Search