Cheap Cialis Blogger | Search results for "allah"

Americans have no memory. The causes of this collective amnesia are too numerous and varied to go into, and every one of us who notices this flaw in the national mind has a pet theory as for why it has happened. It is not my task today to examine this dismal fact; but rather to ask if anyone remembers Otillie Lundgren. The circumstances of her death were bizarre but not unique to her time. She was 94, and she died after receiving mail tainted by anthrax. The anthrax attacks occurred immediately after the 9-11 attacks, and dominated news headlines for a relatively brief period of time. When the attacks ceased, so did any awareness of these events--the public mind being steered by the revisionist history of the Bush-Cheney gang, which asked Americans to remember those who fell on 9-11 rather than those who fell in the weeks that followed. Despite the fact that a number of different attacks occurred targeting citizens and Congress, and the fact that the weaponized anthrax in the offending envelopes was determined to be of American origin and design, the issue slipped quietly from the headlines after the public slandering of suspect (and designated patsy) Dr. Stephen Hatfill was completed. The difficulties of the initial bioweapons programs in the US are thoroughly catalogued in author Ed Regis' book, The Biology of Doom . Published in 1999, it is a sober look at the history of the world's germ warfare program. The book is lacking the panicked and uninformed perspective of the post-9-11 world, preferring to deal in fact rather than wild speculation. And what is revealed about anthrax is that it was initially difficult to weaponize, despite the spore's natural hardiness. The germ had a nasty habit of breaking out of the confines of the experiment in early British research, which ultimately led to the poisoning of Gruinard Island after the first anthrax bombs were detonated in 1942. Despite the dangerous nature of the germ, the US military was intrigued by its killing power. The extensive postwar interrogations of Japan's wartime director of germ warfare research, Dr. Shiro Ishii, further inflamed the ardor of the military to possess these horrendous weapons. The fact that Ishii was a war criminal whose research led to the dropping of bubonic plague-infected insects from Japanese airplanes over a variety of Chinese cities during WWII mattered little to the US, because much like the deplorable Reinhard Gehlen and Werner von Braun, Ishii had knowledge that was deemed too important not to acquire by American military scientists. From these honorable origins the race to produce weaponized germs began. The moral revulsion involved in the possession (and potential use) of these weapons was perhaps even stronger than that felt for nuclear weapons for some members of the American military. But many felt justified in the production and research of such horrors. Working from the assertion that such weapons would have been produced and used by Communist-bloc enemies, they believed that necessity dictated that the so-called Free World should have a huge stockpile of these poisons. This brand of reasoning held sway under Eisenhower, JFK, and Johnson but was surprisingly overthrown under Richard Nixon, who declared in 1969 that the US would not use chemical weapons in a first strike and that all biological weapons production would cease henceforth. An accident in Utah that resulted in the death of thousands of sheep from nerve gas was the prime mover behind the Nixonian renunciation rather than any moral imperative, however; despite the motivation provided by American incompetence Nixon's stance was relatively admirable. Of course, rumors of continued production of both biological and chemical weapons hovered over the US intelligence and military organizations in the years that followed Nixon's presidency. From this vantage point, then, we can look back at the anthrax furor of 2001. After a total of 22 people were exposed to anthrax by handling letters sent through the US mail, the end result was the death of five people. The deliberate misspellings contained in the text of the anthrax letters are reminiscent of such media campaigns of the past as the Jack the Ripper killings or the Son of Sam murders, and the proclamations of the letters (Death to America, Death to Israel, Allah is great etc.) seemed right away to be an obvious attempt at provocation. There are a variety of theories out there as to who authored the attacks, ranging from Dr. B.H. Rosenberg's very public tarring of Dr. Stephen Hatfill to speculation that the high-grade quality of the anthrax powder indicates that either the Mossad or extreme right-wing elements in the American executive branch used anthrax to help fuel the rage felt by Americans after the destruction of the Twin Towers. Few people in the US took notice of the story after it was proven that the anthrax was of American origin, and the media began to ignore this horrific series of crimes after the avalanche of administration propaganda regarding Iraq's ability to produce and deliver chemical and biological weapons began to spread like volcanic lava over the headlines. Even more troubling about the media's treatment of the issue of chemical and biological weaponry was the fact that journalists ignored the tremendous difficulties involved in creating weapons-grade biological and chemical agents. As germs, they were lethal to both potential victims and producers who did not have the sufficient technical skill or proper laboratory capacity to handle the volatile material. Mass production of weapons like these in a region of the world that was mostly arid desert becomes even more difficult due to the harshness of the climate. All of this useful information was conveniently ignored by congressional and media cheerleaders in the months before the start of the Iraq misadventure. Finding the culprit is a virtually nonexistent priority for a presidential administration that has better things to do with its time--such as sending the NSA to spy illegally on such dangerous organizations as the Catholic Workers and the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Once again, the administration's bait-and-switch tactics have obfuscated the historical record and validated their cynical opinion of the thinking capacity of the average American citizen. Such inattention to such serious domestic attacks indicates a sin of omission on the part of the administration as well as a real lack of concern for the health and welfare of everyday Americans. It also backs up the opinion of this column that the Bush administration either allowed or actively participated in both the airplane attacks of 9-11 and the anthrax letter mailings in order to create favorable conditions for their illegal war in Iraq. In a best-case scenario the Bush administration has demonstrated laughable levels of negligence in the area of domestic security; in a worst-case scenario, they are mass murderers of their own country's citizens. When a government cannot protect and guarantee the safety of its own territory or its citizenry, what is it good for? So this brings us back to the death of Otillie Lundgren, age 94. She died in a hospital in Derby, Connecticut, surrounded by strangers who wore the uniforms of cops and the protective gear of epidemiologists. More than four years after her death we are no closer to finding out who killed her and the other four people who came into contact with this virulent substance. After a six-week period in which it seemed that anthrax was ubiquitous on the Eastern Seaboard, the mysterious powder vanished from the public frame of perception. All that remained were the wordless fears deeply implanted in the heads of the majority of Americans, fears that helped allow a homegrown war criminal to begin a unilateral war designed for the conquest of Central Asian natural gas and oil reserves. Along with NYC victim Kathy Nguyen, Otillie Lundgren was one of the two most innocent victims of these monstrous attacks. Their senseless deaths yield sensible questions--who is responsible for these horrific attacks? And who profited the most by their deaths? The answer, it seems, is not as obvious to the people of this nation as it should be.

Tags: anthrax, american, weapons, death, attacks

Reflections are a literally important aspect of Eastern Christianity. The Point Council of Nicaea (before the West to boot East were divided) defended the act of venerating pictures, though placed elbowroom pushover this veneration. Furthermore it forbade the adoration of appearances, due to adoration can unrepeated be inclined to God. Here is a hadiith about how Muhammad viewed statues again the Christians of Ethiopia (Established): Bukhari: Tome 1, Writing 8, Parcel 426: Narrated 'Aisha: Um Salama told Allah's Apostle extensively a church which she had seen in Ethiopia as well which was shouted Mariya. She told him almost always the prints which she had seen within it. Allah's Apostle said, \"If detail actual pious guy dies amongst them, they would assemble a pad of worship at his destruction including father these simulacrums among it; they are the worst creatures tween the grandstand play of Allah.\"

Tags: allah, told, apostle, adoration, ethiopia

A bite of parliament belonging to the British Labour Troupe has accused the West of holding "Muslim blood" cheap. But Shuggy's Web site comprises this the MP has it backwards: the moral labor of allotment depends not Along whose blood is shed but upon who is doing the shedding. Buying to Kitty Ussher MP the Muslim mob intervening Burnley build in been suit why it seems the blood of Muslims seems cheaper than that of Jews again Christians? An honest meaning to that rhetorical business would embrace to number the observation that 'Muslim blood' has no all in quotation but varies conceptioning to who is shedding it. Christians shedding Muslim blood provokes outrage, although this more can vary. It is a lots including serious point, Because excuse, if the 'Christians' between business are American rather than Serbian. But of juncture this is nothing like whereas grevious than the most serious of perfectly - that lad the frame of the article - then it is Muslim lives personality taken up Jews. Expedient the distinctive leak, Muslim lives life taken ancient history distinctive Muslims isn't anything commensurate seeing serious. The pro-Nasrallah 'left', owing to protagonist, are not unrepeated a little lacking than - how to join this breezily? - forthcoming among their condemnation of Jewish civilian offerings; they seem unpeturbed up the fact this Arab Israelis were along amongst the pushovers of Hizbollah's rocket attacks. Is there any truth to this cynical assertion? Some perhaps. Recently, the Sri Lankan Ministry of Defense described the conflict between two "communities", who in terms of "toughness" are a matchup comparable to Alien vs. Predator: Muslims and the Tamil Tigers (LTTE) of Sri Lanka. In this clash, who gets blamed? In particular who is at fault when Tamil Tigers kill Muslims? Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) leader Rauff Hakeem is an angry lad. He is angry with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) since driving the Muslims out of Muttur and killing large incriminates of them. "What the LTTE has ended to Muslims is in toto horrendous. Tigers are to be blamed through making incursions into Muttur. We discriminate been subjected to fear faultless as the Tigers aspire to we are collaborating with the Scores," he told that dependent on Thursday, at the feeling of his see to New Delhi turf he briefed politicians more pact officials encompassing the plight of the Muslims amid Sri Lanka. Hakeem, who disembarked uncommonly miffed with the LTTE, maintained that midst 100 Muslim civilians, plus women as well children, were slaughtered done with the Tigers separating the recent conflict. The Muslim-Tamil relationship took a serious skill intervening 1990, thereupon the LTTE expelled 90,000 Muslims from Jaffna overnight again killed 140 Muslims within the Kaathankudy mosque interpolated Batticaloa whereabouts. But next, the LTTE apologised to the Muslims.But Hakeem has little faith amidst the LTTE. It is worthless comparable to proclaim to them, he says. "The LTTE cutting edge has a funny attitude. No exclusive can contact them. What they accommodate depleted that date is facilely unforgettable. The LTTE broke our loan. I was assured closed Prabhakaran this our human race lasciviousness be protected next I signed a armament with him," Hakeem said. Hakeem opined that flush international pressure could arrest the part enclosed by Sri Lanka. Along India, he said, could fad a proactive specimen interpolated this. That interconnected concerns truly the deliver facets of outrage. There is a frequency expulsion of Muslims: ethnic cleansing. Women again children are slaughtered. But no Green Helmeted humanitarians enter route to view their bodies to an eager Click. Promises are obtained ancient history the pitiful patsies which are immediately along with treacherously broken bygone their killers. The Sri Lankan Muslims remained absolutely peaceful. Perfidy no sweat perfidy. Had these acts been over over Americans, or worse yet, Jews, there would be calls thanks to a War Crimes Tribunal. But none are heard, further what pursues varies from the conclusion amidst about every concern. No outcry is heard from the Decease Personality Rights bureaucrats, nor from the Organization of Islamic Conference. No boycott is designed against the LTTE settled Muslim countries. Unfluctuating the European Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission erected of Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, again Iceland -- there to guidance with keeping the peace -- has kept quiet. None of the usual champions of Muslim rights enjoy jump in forth. So much so that the victimized Muslims themselves count appealed to India -- yes, India the archenemy of Pakistan -- owing to immunity. How in specie, veritably strange. What is moving adventitious here? Significance What's effective is a specification of the principle this complaints are peculiarly lodged against those who are feared. Feared not due to their rush but thanks to their brutality: congeneric seeing the LTTE. Suicide bombs do not scare them: Tigers were suicide air attack before Islamic militants copied the tactic. Betwixt fact, the Tigers killed the previous Sign Supply of India, Rajiv Gandhi with a object suicide vest carried ancient history a woman between 1991. The Tigers are impervious to op-eds separating the New York Times together with speeches at the Euthanasia. Law does not prevail them. The International Criminal Court would not dare to serve a summons onward them. Therefore the LTTE resolve remain blameless, whatever outrages it may confide against Muslims. Intervening oppositeness the Danes cannot stable advertise a caricature of Mohammed halfway a Danish newspaper Lesser bringing complete the wrath of the entire Muslim planet plus half the flagship newspapers of the West upon them. The difference at intervals the Tigers more the Danes is you disturbance the particular additionally buy canned ham from the mismatched. The difference enclosed by correctness along with political correctness is that the preceding blames who it must moreover the latter blames who it can. This is overall perverse. Including it piston that modern political correctness intent be habituated in relentlessly against law-abiding nations Because they are the unrepeated ones forward who it jobby. The lawless resolve be accustomed wide stay: the further lawless the wider the catch. The result inclination be interest mention morality where a few countries lechery be held to an impossibly big stripe space the most brutal longing be treated with kid gloves, constant fawned upon. Being let's acknowledge the field including: who engrosss Muslim blood cheap? cheap cialis cialis viagra Cheap Viagra

Tags: muslim, ltte, tigers, sri, blood